Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Analysis of relations in the state sector of Russian public procurement
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-10-106-126
Abstract
The paper deals with a special sector of public procurement — G2G, in which state organizations act as both customers and suppliers. The analysis shows the convergence between contractual and administrative relations and risks of transferring the negative factors, responsible for market failures, into the administrative system, as well as the changing nature of the state organization. Budget losses in the sector G2G are revealed and estimated. There are doubts, whether the current practice of substitution of market-based instruments for administrative requirements is able to maintain integrity of public procurement in the situation of growing strategic challenges. Measures are proposed for the adjustment and privatization of contractual relations.
Keywords
contract system,
contractual relations,
competition,
public sector ,
budget expenditures,
transaction costs,
public needs
JEL: С72; С78; D43; D44; D52; E65; H11; H41; H57; H82; K12
About the Author
O. V. Anchishkina
Center for Strategic Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Anchishkina
Moscow
References
1. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M., Entov R. (2017). State ownership and efficiency characteristics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 5—37. (In Russian).
2. Anchishkina O. (2017a). Contract institutions in the Russian economy: The sphere of state, municipal, and regulated procurement. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 93—110. (In Russian).
3. Anchishkina O. V. (2017b). The contract system of Russian Federation: Key economic parameters and he major trends in the sphere of state and municipal procurement, procurement of separate types of legal entities. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice, No. 3, рр. 52—76. (In Russian).
4. Anchishkina O. (2017c). “Contract system 2.0” strategy: Modernization of procurement entity institution. Public Order: Managing, Contracting, Ensuring, No. 49, рp. 8—13. (In Russian).
5. Anchishkina O. (2018). Legal and economic characteristic of contract relations — special institution of Russian economy. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki RAN, No. 3, pp. 61—77. (In Russian).
6. Nekipelov A.D. (2017). General theory of market economy: A textbook. Moscow: Moscow school of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russian).
7. Radygin A. D., Entov R. M., Abramov A. E., Aksenov I. V., Ilyasova I. U., Malginov G. N., Chernova M. I. (2018). Effective management of state property in 2018—2024 and until 2035. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).
8. Smotritskaya I. I., Chernykh S. I. (eds.) (2016). The institution of public procurement in the modern Russian economy. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS. (In Russian).
9. CSR (2017a). Public procurement. What should the contr act system be? A report under the academic supervision of O. V. Anchishkina. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).
10. CSR (2017b). The contract system atlas. Indicators of competition on the public procurement markets in the regions of the Russian Federation, 2016. Principal investigator O. V. Anchishkina. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).
11. CSR and RANEPA (2018). G2G sector in public procurement. Analysis of contract relations and the results of the contract system in the segment of public procurement of goods, works, services supplied by public organizations: Analytical report under the scientific guidance of O. V. Anchishkina. Moscow. (In Russian).
12. IMF (2001). Govern ment finance statistics manual 2001 (GFSM 2001). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
13. OECD (2015).Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement. Paris: OECD Publ.
14. UNCITRAL (2014). Model law on public procurement. New York: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. New York: United Nations.
15. Williamson O. E. (1973). Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. Organizational Forms and Internal Efficiency, Vol. 63, No. 2, p. 316—325.
16. Williamson O. E. (2002). The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 171—195.
Review
For citations:
Anchishkina O.V. Analysis of relations in the state sector of Russian public procurement. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(10):106-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-10-106-126
Views:
891
Email this article 
