Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Closed for different reasons: What does survival analysis of SMEs on big data show?

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-6

Abstract

This paper examines the survival determinants of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Russia, drawing on data covering 5.22 million legal entities that combine the Federal Tax Service’s SME register, the Russian Financial Statements Database (RFSD), and the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL) records on ownership and governance. We distinguish four modes of discontinuation: reorganization, probable bankruptcy, removal from the register, and other forms of liquidation. Cox proportional hazards models yield two principal findings. First, the apparent survival advantage of small and mediumsized firms relative to micro-enterprises vanishes — and indeed reverses — once financial performance and ownership structure are controlled for, indicating that what is commonly attributed to size in fact reflects specific organizational characteristics. Second, the four exit scenarios are driven by substantively different factors: bankruptcy is primarily associated with financial performance (ROA), whereas reorganization is linked to affiliation with a corporate group. The effect of the limited liability company (OOO) legal form likewise changes sign once corporate governance variables are included in the specification.

About the Author

A. P. Kazun
Author affiliation: HSE University
Russian Federation

Anton P. Kazun

Moscow



References

1. Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P., Tsareva Y. V. (2018). Entrepreneurship and institutions: Does the relationship exist at the regional level in Russia? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 92—116. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-92-116

2. Golikova V. V., Mukovnin S. K., Kazun A. P., Ershova N. V. (2025). Shortage of skilled workforce in manufacturing: A consequence of firms ineffectiveness or an obstacle for the growth of effective firms? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 39—65. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/00428736-2025-2-39-65

3. Zemtsov S. P., Smelov Y. A. (2018). Factors of regional development in Russia: Geography, human capital or regional policies. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 4, pp. 84—108. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-4

4. Kazun A. P. (2025). With a team and without debt: Factors affecting small business survival in Russia, 2021—2023. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 83—110. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-83-110

5. Obraztsova O. I., Chepurenko A. Y. (2020). Entrepreneurial activity in Russia and its cross-regional differences. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 198—210. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-12

6. Simachev Y. V., Yakovlev A. A., Golikova V. V., Gorodny N. A., Kuznetsov B. V., Kuzyk M. G., Fedyunina A. A. (2023). Russian industrial companies under the “second wave” of sanctions: Response strategies. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 5—30. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-5-30

7. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.

8. Aidis R., Adachi Y. (2007). Russia: Firm entry and survival barriers. Economic Systems, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 391—411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.08.003

9. Altman E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 589—609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x

10. Angrist J. D., Pischke J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.

11. Audretsch D. B., Mahmood T. (1995). New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 97—103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109995

12. Balcaen S., Manigart S., Buyze J., Ooghe H. (2012). Firm exit after distress: Differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A. Small Business Economics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 949—975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9342-7

13. Baumöhl E., Iwasaki I., Kocenda E. (2019). Institutions and determinants of firm survival in European emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 58, pp. 431—453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.008

14. Bondarkov S., Ledenev V., Skougarevskiy D. (2025). Russian financial statements database: A firm-level collection of the universe of financial statements. Scientific Data, Vol. 12, article 995. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05150-1

15. Caves R. E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 1947—1982.

16. Cefis E., Bettinelli C., Coad A., Marsili O. (2022). Understanding firm exit: A systematic literature review. Small Business Economics, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 423—446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00480-x

17. Cefis E., Marsili O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 626—641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006

18. Cox D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 187—220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x

19. DeTienne D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 203—215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004

20. DeTienne D. R., McKelvie A., Chandler G. N. (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 255—272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.007

21. Esteve-Pérez S., Sanchis-Llopis A., Sanchis-Llopis J. A. (2004). The determinants of survival of Spanish manufacturing firms. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, pp. 251—273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-004-1972-3

22. Esteve-Pérez S., Sanchis-Llopis A., Sanchis-Llopis J. A. (2010). A competing risks analysis of firms’ exit. Empirical Economics, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 281—304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0266-x

23. Fine J. P., Gray R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 94, No. 446, pp. 496—509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144

24. Geroski P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 13, pp. 421—440. https://doi.org/10.1016/01677187(95)00498-X

25. Giovannetti G., Ricchiuti G., Velucchi M. (2011). Size, innovation and internationalization: A survival analysis of Italian firms. Applied Economics, Vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 1511—1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600566

26. Hannan M. T., Freeman J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038288

27. Harhoff D., Stahl K., Woywode M. (1998). Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms — empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 453—488. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00083

28. Headd B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 51—61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024433630958

29. Helmers C., Rogers M. (2010). Innovation and the survival of new firms in the UK. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 227—248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-010-9247-7

30. Iwasaki I. (2014). Global financial crisis, corporate governance, and firm survival: The Russian experience. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 178—211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.03.015

31. Iwasaki I., Adachi Y. (2024). Legal weakness, investment risks, and distressed acquisitions: Evidence from Russian regions. Comparative Economic Studies, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 1—69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-022-00203-5

32. Iwasaki I., Kim B. (2020). Legal forms, organizational architecture, and firm failure: A large survival analysis of Russian corporations. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 227—275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09644-8

33. Jovanovic B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 649—670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912606

34. Kato M., Onishi K., Honjo Y. (2022). Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes. Small Business Economics, Vol. 59, pp. 449—475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00481-w

35. Kazun A., Libman A., Yakovlev A. (2025). Expectations matter: Strategies of small businesses under economic sanctions in Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, December 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2025.2594407

36. Lunn M., McNeil D. (1995). Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 524—532. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532940

37. Manjón-Antolin M. C., Arauzo-Carod J. M. (2008). Firm survival: Methods and evidence. Empirica, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1—24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-007-9048-x

38. Rajan R. G., Zingales L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 559—586.

39. Rochlitz M., Kazun A., Yakovlev A. A. (2020). Property rights in Russia after 2009: From business capture to centralized corruption? Post­Soviet Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 5—6, pp. 434—450. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1786777

40. Shumway T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. Journal of Business, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 101—124. https://doi.org/10.1086/209665

41. Stinchcombe A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In: J. G. March (ed.). Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 142—193.

42. Wennberg K., Wiklund J., DeTienne D. R., Cardon M. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 361—375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001


Review

For citations:


Kazun A.P. Closed for different reasons: What does survival analysis of SMEs on big data show? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(6):5-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-6

Views: 498

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)