Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Factors of the gap between environmental concern and behavior among urban residents in Russia
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-5-144-157
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of the “attitude—behavior gap” — the discrepancy between environmental concern and actual individual behavior, using the example of five consumer practices among urban residents in Russia. The aim of the work is to empirically assess the scale of this discrepancy and to identify socio-demographic, psychological, and behavioral factors that determine it. The empirical basis is data from the online survey “Economic behavior of households”, which represents urban population of Russia with internet access, aged 18 and over. Through a series of multinominal logistic regressions, the study has found that despite the high level of environmental concern among urban Russians, engagement in specific practices remains low and selective. The influence of sociodemographic factors was mixed: of the significant predictors, age of 25—44 consistently increased the odds of a gap, while family income, education, and psychological distress were significant only for certain practices. A positive association was found between news consumption and environmental engagement; however, both traditional and new media were associated with inconsistent bridging the gap across different practices. To promote actions in the field of environmentally conscious consumption, it is necessary to reduce behavioral barriers and develop practical competencies among the population.
Keywords
environmental behavior,
environmental practices,
environmentally responsible consumption,
consumer behavior,
attitude—behavior gap,
population surveys,
urban population,
Russia
JEL: D12, O35, Q56, Q57
References
1. Zakharova O. V., Glazkova A. V., Khodyrev A. N., Bessonova S. D., Zagaynova E. O., Ivanova D. V., Kalimova A. E., Vasilets A. A. (2024). Who is ready to join green practices: Automatic analysis of user interest. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 77—96. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2024-10-4-77-96
2. Kurbanov A. R., Prokhoda V. A. (2019). Ecological culture: An empirical projection (attitudes of Russians towards climate change). Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, No. 4, pp. 347—370. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.17
3. Radaev V. V. (2025). Non-standard consumption. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
4. Shabanova M. A. (2023). Ethical consumption as a sphere of Russian civil society: Factors and the development potential of market practices. Journal of Economic Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 13—54. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2023-1-13-54
5. Shabanova M. A. (2024a). Unnecessary things, the garbage problem, and solidarity practices of Russian consumers. Journal of Economic Sociology, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 11—42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-32472024-2-11-42
6. Shabanova M. A. (2024b). Ethical consumption: Theoretical concepts and a contribution to the debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 53—80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-7-53-80
7. Shcherbak A. N., Zubarev N. S., Semushkina E. S. (2025). “Pochvenniki” — for the soil! Conservative attitudes and pro-environmental behavior in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, No. 2, pp. 66—89. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2025.2.2801
8. Yanitsky O. N. (2018). Russian metropolises in the context of global socio-environmental challenges. Social Sciences and Modernity, No. 1, pp. 5—16. (In Russian).
9. Cedrún-Vázquez E., Núñez-Ríos J., Sánchez-García J., Sosa-Gómez G., Rojas O. (2025). Structural equation modeling for analyzing pro-environmental behavior in Switzerland. Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 8, article 3624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083624
10. Che W., Yang C. (2024). Human awareness and behavior on the driving of sustainable city environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 112, No. 1, article 105604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105604
11. Dunlap R. E. (2016). A brief history of sociological research on environmental concern. In: A. Telesiene, M. Gross (eds.). Green European: Environmental behavior and attitudes in Europe in a historical and cross-cultural comparative perspective. London: Routledge, pp. ix—xxi.
12. Dunlap R. E., Jones R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In: R. E. Dunlap, W. Michelson (eds.). Handbook of environmental sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 482—524.
13. Farjam M., Nikolaychuk O., Bravo G. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude—behavior gap in high-cost situations. Ecological Economics, Vol. 166, No. C, article 106434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106434
14. Gifford R. D., Chen A. K. S. (2017). Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change, Vol. 140, No. 2, pp. 165—178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1830-y
15. Hoffmann S., Balderjahn I., Seegebarth B., Mai R., Peyer M. (2018). Under which conditions are consumers ready to boycott or buycott? The roles of hedonism and simplicity. Ecological Economics, Vol. 147, pp. 167—178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.004
16. Hristova V., Haralampiev K., Vlaev I., Karabeliova S. (2025). Predicting pro-environmental behavior: The leading influence of environmental attitudes. Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 3, article 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030291
17. IPCC (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kennedy E. H., Givens J. E. (2019). Eco-habitus or eco-powerlessness? Examining environmental concern across social class. Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 646—667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419836966
19. Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 239—260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
20. Kulin J., Johansson Sevä I. (2020). Quality of government and the relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: A crossnational study. Environmental Politics, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 727—752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1809160
21. Langenbach B., Berger S., Baumgartner T., Knoch D. (2019). Cognitive resources moderate the relationship between pro-environmental attitudes and green behavior. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 979—995. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0013916519843127
22. Lukina A., Mkhitaryan S., Sidorchuk R., Nevostruev P., Lukina E. (2025). Conceptual research model of metropolis residents’ pro-environmental behavior. Emerging Science Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 1285—1307. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2025-09-03-09
23. Mannoni E. (2025). “I’m worried, but”: Unpacking the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 644—665. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12660
24. Marquart-Pyatt S. T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns crossnationally: A multilevel investigation. Social Science Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1085—1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.003
25. Müller A., Bács Z., Fenyves V., Kovács S., Lengyel A., Bácsné E. B. (2025). Demographic influences on environmental attitudes and actions: An analysis of the attitude—behavior gap. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, Vol. 60, No. 2spl, pp. 1028—1040. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.602spl01-1477
26. OECD (2023). How green is household behaviour? Sustainable choices in a time of interlocking crises. OECD Studies on Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour. Paris: OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/2bbbb663-en
27. Oreg S., Katz-Gerro T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 462—483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505286012
28. Valko D. (2021). Environmental attitudes and contextual stimuli in emerging environmental culture: An empirical study from Russia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 27, pp. 2075—2089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.008
29. Wyss A., Knoch D., Berger S. (2021). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 79, article 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva D.R. Factors of the gap between environmental concern and behavior among urban residents in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(5):144-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-5-144-157
Views:
270
JATS XML
Email this article 