Theoretical aspects of the cost of utilities and their practical implementation
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-4-130-144
Abstract
The study analyzes the economic nature of public utilities. It demonstrates that they are provided by economic entities with a monopoly position in local (settlement) markets, which necessitates state regulation of their activities. At the same time, utilities are a mixed (club) good and have such a characteristic of a public good as non-rival consumption. For paid services, this means the need to ensure both technological and financial accessibility for all consumers. Currently, financial accessibility is maintained through caps on the rate of increase in utility payments made by households. The use of this approach has led to a decrease in tariff revenues of resource supply organizations and a crisis in the utility sector. It is substantiated that the most effective mechanism for ensuring the availability of services to consumers while maintaining the financial stability of resource-supplying enterprises is to improve the targeted system of subsidies to households for housing and utilities. The study proposes introducing a criterion for the financial accessibility of public services in the form of the maximum proportion of households receiving subsidies for services, as an indicator of the possibility of tariff increases for the population. The assessment of the introduction of this indicator for tariff dynamics, income of resourcesupplying organizations and budget expenditures has been carried out.
About the Authors
S. B. SivaevRussian Federation
Sergey B. Sivaev
Moscow
A. M. Abdullaev
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Abdullaev
Moscow
References
1. Bank of Russia (2025). Inflation in Russia, No. 12. Information and analytical commentary.
2. Gentsler I. V., Lykova T. B., Zhelezova E. P., Puzanov A. S. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the system of targeted support for low-income families when paying for housing and utilities, proposals for its improvement. Gorodskoy Almanakh, Iss. 9. Moscow: Institute for Urban Economics, pp. 144—175. (In Russian).
3. Karpov A. L. (2008). Natural and artificial monopolies in housing and communal services. Economic Sciences, No. 7, pp. 83—86. (In Russian).
4. McConnell K. R., Brue S. L. (2003). Economics: Principles, problems, and policy. In 2 vols. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russian).
5. Mezetskaya V. A. (2020). Sectoral tariff agreement and labor rationing are the basis of the economy of industry organizations. ZhKKhEkspert: Ekonomika i Pravo, No. 8, pp. 50—54. (In Russian).
6. Menar K., Kryuchkova P. V., Kudryashova E. N., Porokhovskaya O. A., Sork D. M., Shastitko A. E. (2000). Contracts and costs in resource-supplying sub-sectors of housing and communal services. Moscow: Teis. (In Russian).
7. Ryakhovskaya A. N., Tagi-zade F. G. (2011). Communal activities — the sphere of public goods and natural monopoly. Moscow: Institute of Economics and Crisis Management. (In Russian).
8. Sivaev S. B. (2018). Housing and communal complex — between politics and economics. Moscow: CSR. (In Russian).
9. Sivaev S. B., Abdullaev A. M. (2024). On the criteria of financial accessibility of utility services. Energosberezhenie, No. 3, pp. 22—29. (In Russian).
10. Sivaev S. B., Smirnov O. O., Abdullaev A. M. (2024). Connection fee as a factor to ensure financial affordability of utility services for consumers. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 38—54. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-5-38-54
11. Fischer S., Dornbush R., Shmalenzi R. (1993). Economics. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
12. CSR (2024). The water supply and sanitation sector in Russia: Current state and development paths. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).
13. Chernyshov L. N. (2024). Organizational and legal problems of the personnel transformation in housing and communal services and ways of their solution. Housing and Utilities Infrastructure, No. 2, pp. 112—120. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.36622/25419110.2024.29.2.012
14. Shastitko A. E., Golovanova S. V. (2013). The consequences of weak competition: Quantitative assessments and conclusions for policy. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
15. Yakobson L. I., Kolosnitsyna M. G. (2017). Public sector economics. Moscow: Yurait. (In Russian).
16. Dol C. P., Haffner M. E. A. (eds.) (2010). Housing statistics in the European Union. Delft University of Technology.
17. Haffner M. E. A. (2009). Housing allowances in comparative perspective. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 24, pp. 85—87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-008-9133-x
18. Samuelson P. A., Nordhaus W. D. (1989). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Review
For citations:
Sivaev S.B., Abdullaev A.M. Theoretical aspects of the cost of utilities and their practical implementation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(4):130-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-4-130-144
JATS XML













