Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Structural decomposition of interregional differences in labor productivity in Russia in 2010—2023

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-3-129-148

Abstract

The article presents structural analysis of interregional disparities in labor productivity levels and growth rates across Russia. The study aims to uncover structural foundations of spatial differentiation in labor productivity by comparing its static (levels) and dynamic (growth rates) aspects. It examines the roles of industrial specialization, resource allocation efficiency, and intra-industry disparities, and assesses the contribution of these factors to interregional income inequality. The analysis utilizes data on the subject of the Russian Federation for 2010—2023, broken down by economic activity (excluding extractive indust­ ries) and adjusted for regional price differentials. The shift-share analysis is employed to decompose the deviation of regional indicators from the national average into sectoral, localization, and regional components. The results reveal a persistent trend toward convergence in labor productivity levels but a growing divergence in growth rates. The factor of sectoral structure diversity contributed in the least to these processes, often promoting regional convergence. The second most influential factor was the concentration of production in regions, reflecting agglomeration effects: it fostered divergence in productivity levels but countered it in growth rates. The most significant influence came from regional differences in within-industry labor productivity. Combinations of shift-share decomposition components define distinct models of labor productivity level and growth formation in the regions. Simulation-based calculations assess the direction and magnitude of structural components’ impact on labor productivity growth in shaping interregional inequality in per capita GRP.

About the Author

L. V. Melnikova
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Larisa V. Melnikova

Novosibirsk



References

1. Melnikova L. V. (2021). Spatial analysis of structural shifts dynamics in economies of Russian regions from 2004 to 2019. Region: Economics and Sociology, No. 3, pp. 54—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20210303

2. Suslov V. I., Ibragimov N. M. (2005). Introduction to socio-economic statistics. Novosibirsk: NSU. (In Russian).

3. Adão R., Kolesar M., Morales E. (2019). Shift-share designs: Theory and inference. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 1949—2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz025

4. Capello R. (2007). Regional economics. London and New York: Routledge.

5. Capello R., Cerisola S. (2023). Industrial transformations and regional inequalities in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 15—28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01097-4

6. Casler S. D. (1989). A theoretical context for shift and share analysis. Regional Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 43—48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343408912331345272

7. Dieppe A. (ed.) (2021). Global productivity: Trends, drivers, and policies. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1608-6

8. Dunn E. S. (1960). A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 97—112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01705.x

9. Esteban J. (2000). Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: A shift-share analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 353—364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00035-1

10. Gluschenko K. (2022). Costs of living and real incomes in the Russian regions. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 365—377. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700022

11. Lahr M. L., Ferreira J. P. (2020). A reconnaissance through the history of shift-share analysis. In: M. M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp (eds.). Handbook of regional science. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_134

12. Montanía C. V., Márquez M. A., Fernández-Núñez T., Hewings G. J. (2024). Toward a more comprehensive shift-share analysis: An illustration using regional data. Growth and Change, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 1—23. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12693

13. Nazara S., Hewings G. (2004). Spatial structure and taxonomy of decomposition in shift-share analysis. Growth and Change, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 476—490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00258.x

14. Norcliffe G. B. (1977). A components model for disaggregating regional productivity­ variations. Regional Studies, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 395—400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237700185421

15. OECD (2025). OECD compendium of productivity indicators 2025. Paris: OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/b024d9e1-en

16. Oosterhaven J. (2024). A decomposition of economic growth decompositions. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 1395—1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-024-01309-7

17. Oosterhaven J., Broersma L. (2007). Sector structure and cluster economies: A decomposition of regional labour productivity. Regional Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 639—659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120320

18. Oosterhaven J., van Loon J. (1979). Sectoral structure and regional wage differen­ tials: A shift and share analysis on 40 Dutch regions for 1973. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 3—16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1979.tb01683.x

19. Stilwell F. J. (1970). Further thoughts on the shift and share approach. Regional Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 451—458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237000185451


Review

For citations:


Melnikova L.V. Structural decomposition of interregional differences in labor productivity in Russia in 2010—2023. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(3):129-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-3-129-148

Views: 351

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)