|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Business participation in social development of the territory: Limitations and potential opportunities
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-126-132
Abstract
Based on the results of sociological research, key barriers that prevent active integration of the business sector into social and economic development of the territories are identified, and the problems of interaction between government and business at the municipal level in present Russian conditions are determined. It is concluded that only on the basis of building common values between the authorities and the business community, changing their behavioral attitudes it is possible to increase the level of social responsibility of business and actively implement social investment.
References
1. Russian Managers Association (2002). Social responsibility of the company: Practical utility for business: Methodological guidance. Moscow. (In Russian).
2. Blagov Y. E. et al. (2014). Report on social investment in Russia. 2014: Creating value for business and society. Saint-Petersburg: ATM Kniga. (In Russian).
3. Vittenberg E. Ya. (2017). Social responsibility of Russian business in a crisis. Vestnik Instituta Sociologii, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 76—113. (In Russian).
4. Ivanova N. (2016). Social investments: International experience and demand in Russia. Informational Analytical Bulletin on the Development of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector in the Russian Federation, No. 2, pp. 9—11. (In Russian).
5. Kuzina O. E., Chernysheva M. V. (2015). Corporate charity and responsibility: Justification of concepts. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mnenija: Ekonomicheskie i Social’nye Peremeny, No. 4, pp. 154—165. (In Russian).
6. Frolova E. V., Medvedeva N. V. (2018а). Social partnership of business and government: mutual expectations and tendencies of development in modern conditions. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 2, pр. 146—151. (In Russian).
7. Kuzina O. E., Chernysheva M. V. (2015). Corporate charity and responsibility: Justification of concepts. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mnenija: Ekonomicheskie i Social’nye Peremeny, No. 4, pp. 154—165. (In Russian).
8. Frolova E. V., Medvedeva N. V. (2018а). Social partnership of business and government: mutual expectations and tendencies of development in modern conditions. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 2, pр. 146—151. (In Russian).
9. GIIN (2017). Beyond investment: The power of capacity-building support. Global Impact Investing Network.
10. Maher F. J. (2014). Integrating social responsibility with business strategy: A guide for quality professionals. American Society for Quality (ASQ).
11. McElhaney K. A. (2008). Just good business: The strategic guide to aligning corporate responsibility and brand. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
12. Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. January-February, pp. 62-77.
13. Post J. E., Preston L. E., Sachs S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14. Saltuk Y., Idrissi A., Bouri A., Mudaliar A., Schiff H. (2015). Eyes on the horizon: The impact investor survey. J.P. Morgan and Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN).
15. Steurer R., Langer M. E., Konrad A., Martinuzzi A. (2005). Corporation, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 263-281.
Review
For citations:
Medvedeva N.V. Business participation in social development of the territory: Limitations and potential opportunities. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(6):126-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-126-132
Views:
830
Email this article 
