

Corporate Governance and the Efficiency of Company’s Operation: The Case of Gazprom
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-3-86-103
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of efficiency of Gazprom from the shareholders standpoint. Special attention is paid to Gazprom cost structures both on the operational side and as a part of its capital expenditures. Comparative analysis of Gazprom vs its interantional peers adds more colors to the evaluation of cost efficiency. Different behavioural patterns of previous and current Gazprom management are outlined. Basing on the investigation of Gazprom Board of Directors influence on its efficiency the article provides practical reccomendations aimed at improving relationships in the triangle "shareholders - Board of Directors - management".
About the Author
V. KleinerRussian Federation
References
1. Газовая промышленность. Экономико-статистический обзор. М.: ОАО «Газпром», 2004.
2. Милов В., Селивахин И. Проблемы энергетической политики // Московский центр Карнеги: Рабочие материалы. 2005. № 4.
3. Belton C. The Rising Price of Pipes for Gazprom // Moscow Times. 2005. June 16
4. Brown H. More Mismanagement from Moscow // Forbes Magazine. 2005. June 2.
5. Buckley N., Gorst I. Report Questions Gazprom Strategy Energy // The Financial Times. 2005. June 2
6. Enav P. Russian Gas to 2020. April 2003. http://www.emerging-markets.com
7. Prospects of Loan Participation Notes // Gazprom. 2004. April 19.
8. Gazprom Structured Notes Preliminary Offering Circular. 2004. July 12.
9. Hill F., Fee F. Fueling the Future:The Prospects for Russian Oil and Gas // Demokratizatsiya. 2002. Vol. 10. No 4. P. 462-487.
10. Mabro R., Wybrew-Bond I. (eds.) Gas to Europe: The Strategies of the Four Major Suppliers. Oxford University Press, 1999.
11. Minority Interests Question Extent of Gazprom Reform // Financial Times. 2003. May 28.
12. Murphy K. As Gazprom Grows, So Does Russia's Sway // Los Angeles Times. 2005. October 16.
13. Russia Secures Turkmenistan Gas Exports until 2028 // The Economist. 2004. October 25.
14. Russia's Enron // Business Week. 2002. February 18.
15. Stern J. Security of European Natural Gas Supplies. The Impact of Import Dependence and Liberalization. Royal Institute of International Affairs, UK, 2002.
16. Van der Linde C., Stern J. The Future of Gas: Will Reality Meet Expectation? 9th International Energy Forum 2004. 22-24 May, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.iefs.org.sa/IEF_MTNG/9th/Docs/Paper_Linde_Stern.pdf.
17. Victor D., Makarova N. The Belarus Connection: Exporting Russian Gas to Germany and Poland. Institute for Public Policy of Rice University, Working Paper No 26, May 2004.
18. Watson N. Investor Says Gazprom Undervalued // The Deal. 2005. June 2. http://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/Technologie-und-Energie/Energiepolitik/energiestatistiken,did=53736.html.
19. White G.L. Gazprom's Rising Costs Raise Concerns // The Wall Street Journal. 2005. June 2.
Review
For citations:
Kleiner V. Corporate Governance and the Efficiency of Company’s Operation: The Case of Gazprom. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2006;(3):86-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-3-86-103