Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Судьба дискуссии двух Кембриджей о теории капитала (комментарии Л. Пазинетти, Ф. Фишера, Х. Фелипе и Дж. Маккомби, Р. Гринфилда и ответ авторов)

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-8-4-27

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В статье известных теоретиков и историков экономической мысли представлен подробный обзор дискуссии двух Кембриджей о теории капитала, продолжавшейся с середины 1950-х до середины 1970-х годов. Авторы прослеживают истоки противоречий и в хронологическом порядке разбирают аргументы обеих сторон. С точки зрения авторов, полемика не получила своего завершения, а решающим фактором в ней стали идеологические убеждения и фундаментальные методологические разногласия о природе равновесия и о роли времени в экономической теории. Статья публикуется вместе с комментариями других ведущих теоретиков.

Об авторах

А. Коэн
Йоркский университет
Канада
профессор


Дж. Харкурт
Кембриджский университет
Великобритания
профессор


Список литературы

1. Bharadwaj K. Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories. New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1978.

2. Blaug M. The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? A Critical Analysis of Cambridge Theories of Value and Distribution. Revised Edition. L.: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.

3. Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.

4. Bliss C. The Theory of Capital: A Personal View // Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.

5. Böhm-Bawerk E. Capital and Interest Once More: II. A Relapse to the Productivity Theory // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1907. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 280.

6. Burmeister E. The Capital Theory Controversy // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. H. D. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. P. 305-314.

7. Champernowne D. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-54. Vol. 21, No 1. P. 112-135.

8. Clark J. B. Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1891. Vol. 5, No 3.

9. Cohen A. Prices, Capital, and the One-Commodity Model in Neoclassical and Classical Theories // History of Political Economy. 1989. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 231-251.

10. Cohen A. Samuelson and the 93% Scarcity Theory of Value // The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Growth, Distribution and Structural Change. Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti / M. Baranzini, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1993. P. 149-172.

11. Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time // Capital Theory / C. J. Bliss, A. J. Cohen, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, 2005, Vol. I. P. xxvii-lx.

12. Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time. P. xxvii-lx.

13. Dixit A. The Accumulation of Capital Theory // Oxford Economic Papers. 1977. Vol. 29, No 1. P. 1-29.

14. Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.

15. Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.

16. Felipe J., Fisher F. Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know // Metroeconomica. 2003. Vol. 54, No 2. P. 208-262.

17. Felipe J., McCombie J. A Problem with Some Estimations and Interpretations of the Mark-up in Manufacturing Industry // International Review of Applied Economics. 2002. Vol. 16, No 2. P. 187-215.

18. Felipe J., McCombie J. Some Methodological Problems with the Neoclassical Analysis of the East Asian Miracle // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 54, No 5. P. 695-721.

19. Fisher F. Adjustment Processes and Stability // The New Palgrave: General Equilibrium. John Eatwell / M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). N. Y.: Norton, 1989. P. 36-42;

20. Fisher F. Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1971. Vol. 53, No 4. P. 325.

21. Fisher F. Aggregation: Aggregate Production Functions and Related Topics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.

22. Fisher F. The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions // Econometrica. 1969. Vol. 37, No 4. P. 553-577.

23. Fisher I. The Rate of Interest: Its Nature, Determination, and Relation to Economic Phenomena. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1907.

24. Fisher I. The Theory of Interest. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1930.

25. Garegnani P. Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution // Review of Economic Studies. 1970. Vol. 37, No 3. P. 407-436.

26. Goodwin R. A Growth Cycle // Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb / C. Feinstein (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. P. 54-58.

27. Hahn F. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984. P. 53.

28. Hahn F. General Equilibrium Theory // The Crisis in Economic Theory / D. Bell, I. Kristol (eds.). N. Y.: Basic Books, 1981. P. 128.

29. Hahn F. The Share of Wages in the National Income. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1972. P. 8.

30. Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital // Journal of Economic Literature. 1969. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 369-405.

31. Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

32. Harcourt G. C. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons - or Dead End? // Oxford Economic Papers. 1976. Vol. 28, No 1. P. 26-65.

33. Hayek F. The Pure Theory of Capital. L.: Routledge, 1941.

34. Hennings K. The Exchange Paradigm and the Theory of Production and Distribution // Foundations of Economics / M. Baranzini, R. Scazzieri (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

35. Ingrao B., Israel G. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

36. Kaldor N. Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy. The 1984 Raffaele Mattioli Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

37. Kaldor N. On the Theory of Capital: A Rejoinder to Professor Knight // Econometrica. 1938. Vol. 6, No 2. P. 14.

38. Kalecki M. Trend and Business Cycles Reconsidered // Economic Journal. 1968. Vol. 78, No 310. P. 263-276;

39. Knight F. Professor Fisher's Interest Theory: A Case in Point // Journal of Political Economy. 1931. Vol. 39, No 2. P. 210.

40. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

41. Levhari D. A Nonsubstitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1965. Vol. 79, No 1. P. 98-105.

42. McCombie J. The Solow Residual, Technical Change and Aggregate Production Functions // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2000-2001. Vol. 23, No 2. P. 267-297; errata. Vol. 23, No 3. P. 544.

43. Paradoxes in Capital Theory: A Symposium / P. Samuelson (ed.) // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-583.

44. Pasinetti L. Again on Capital Theory and Solow's 'Rate of Return' // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 428-431.

45. Pasinetti L. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-517.

46. Pasinetti L. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 383-431.

47. Pasinetti L. Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

48. Pasinetti L. Structural Economic Dynamics. A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

49. Pasinetti L. Switches of Technique and the 'Rate of Return' in Capital Theory // Economic Journal. 1969. Vol. 79, No 315. P. 503-531.

50. Persky J. The Neoclassical Advent: American Economics at the Turn of the 20th Century // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 95-108.

51. Phelps Brown E. H. The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1957. Vol. 71. P. 546-560.

52. Robinson J. Capital Theory up to Date // Canadian Journal of Economics. 1970. Vol. 3, No 2. P. 309-317.

53. Robinson J. Collected Economic Papers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1980 [1974]. Vol. 5. P. vii.

54. Robinson J. History Versus Equilibrium // Collected Economic Papers. Vol. 5. P. 57.

55. Robinson J. Imperfect Competition Revisited // Economic Journal. 1953. Vol. 63, No 251. P. 590.

56. Robinson J. Reswitching: Reply // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 54.

57. Robinson J. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-1954. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 81.

58. Robinson J. The Unimportance of Reswitching // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 32-39.

59. Samuelson P. A Summing Up // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 568-583.

60. Samuelson P. Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function // Review of Economic Studies. 1962. Vol. 29, No 3. P. 193-206.

61. Schefold B. Paradoxes of Capital and Counterintuitive Changes of Distribution in an Intertemporal Equilibrium Model // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics / H. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 363-391.

62. Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II // Growth, Profits and Property. Essays in the Revival of Political Economy. E. J. Nell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. P. 80-95.

63. Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1974. Vol. 56, No 1. P. 115-120.

64. Simon H. Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations // American Economic Review. 1979. Vol. 69, No 4. P. 493-513.

65. Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, No 1. P. 65-94;

66. Solow R. Capital Theory and the Rate of Return. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1963.

67. Solow R. On the Rate of Return: Reply to Pasinetti // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 423-428.

68. Solow R. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957. Vol. 39, No 3. P. 312-320.

69. Solow R. The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 349-381.

70. Sraffa P. Comment // The Theory of Capital. F. A. Lutz, D. C. Hague (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1961. P. 305-306.

71. Sraffa P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities-Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960

72. Sraffa P. Production of Commodities: a comment // Economic Journal. 1962. Vol. 72, No 286. P. 479.

73. Swan T. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation // Economic Record. 1956. Vol. 32, No 2. P. 343-361.

74. The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution / G. Caravale (ed.). Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 1976.

75. Veblen T. Professor Clark's Economics // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1908. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 147-195.

76. Walsh V., Gram H. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1980.

77. Wicksell K. Lectures on Political Economy. Vol. 1. L.: George Routledge & Sons, 1911 [1934]. P. 149.

78. Yeager L. Toward Understanding Some Paradoxes in Capital Theory // Economic Inquiry. 1976. Vol. 14, No 3. P. 313-346.


Для цитирования:


Коэн А., Харкурт Д. Судьба дискуссии двух Кембриджей о теории капитала (комментарии Л. Пазинетти, Ф. Фишера, Х. Фелипе и Дж. Маккомби, Р. Гринфилда и ответ авторов). Вопросы экономики. 2009;(8):4-27. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-8-4-27

For citation:


Cohen A., Harcourt G. Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? (With comments by L. Pasinetti, F. Fisher, J. Felipe and J. McCombie, R. Greenfield and reply by the authors). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2009;(8):4-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-8-4-27

Просмотров: 90


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)