<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2009-8-4-27</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-905</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ISSUES OF THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Судьба дискуссии двух Кембриджей о теории капитала (комментарии Л. Пазинетти, Ф. Фишера, Х. Фелипе и Дж. Маккомби, Р. Гринфилда и ответ авторов)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?  (With comments by L. Pasinetti, F. Fisher, J. Felipe and J. McCombie, R. Greenfield and reply by the authors)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коэн</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Харкурт</surname><given-names>Дж.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Harcourt</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Йоркский университет</institution><country>Канада</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>York University</institution><country>Canada</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Кембриджский университет</institution><country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>University of Cambridge</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>08</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/905">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/905</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье известных теоретиков и историков экономической мысли представлен подробный обзор дискуссии двух Кембриджей о теории капитала, продолжавшейся с середины 1950-х до середины 1970-х годов. Авторы прослеживают истоки противоречий и в хронологическом порядке разбирают аргументы обеих сторон. С точки зрения авторов, полемика не получила своего завершения, а решающим фактором в ней стали идеологические убеждения и фундаментальные методологические разногласия о природе равновесия и о роли времени в экономической теории. Статья публикуется вместе с комментариями других ведущих теоретиков.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article written by the well-known theorists and historians of economic thought contains a detailed overview of the Cambridge capital controversy, which had raged from the mid-1950-s through the mid-1970-s. The authors track the origins of the controversy and cover arguments of both sides in chronological order. From their point of view, the discussion hasnt been resolved, and its main underlying aspects were ideological beliefs and fundamental methodological controversies on the nature of equilibrium and on the role of time in economic theory. The article is published with comments written by other leading theoreticians.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дискуссия двух Кембриджей</kwd><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd><kwd>равновесие</kwd><kwd>теория капитала</kwd><kwd>агрегирование</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Cambridge capital controversy</kwd><kwd>capital theory</kwd><kwd>general equilibrium</kwd><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd><kwd>economic theory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bharadwaj K. Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories. New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bharadwaj K. Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories. New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1978.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blaug M. The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? A Critical Analysis of Cambridge Theories of Value and Distribution. Revised Edition. L.: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blaug M. The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? A Critical Analysis of Cambridge Theories of Value and Distribution. Revised Edition. L.: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bliss C. The Theory of Capital: A Personal View // Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bliss C. The Theory of Capital: A Personal View // Bliss C. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam; N. Y.: Elsevier; North-Holland, 1975.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Böhm-Bawerk E. Capital and Interest Once More: II. A Relapse to the Productivity Theory // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1907. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 280.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Böhm-Bawerk E. Capital and Interest Once More: II. A Relapse to the Productivity Theory // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1907. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 280.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burmeister E. The Capital Theory Controversy // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. H. D. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. P. 305-314.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burmeister E. The Capital Theory Controversy // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics. H. D. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. P. 305-314.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Champernowne D. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-54. Vol. 21, No 1. P. 112-135.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Champernowne D. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-54. Vol. 21, No 1. P. 112-135.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clark J. B. Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1891. Vol. 5, No 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clark J. B. Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1891. Vol. 5, No 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen A. Prices, Capital, and the One-Commodity Model in Neoclassical and Classical Theories // History of Political Economy. 1989. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 231-251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen A. Prices, Capital, and the One-Commodity Model in Neoclassical and Classical Theories // History of Political Economy. 1989. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 231-251.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen A. Samuelson and the 93% Scarcity Theory of Value // The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Growth, Distribution and Structural Change. Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti / M. Baranzini, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1993. P. 149-172.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen A. Samuelson and the 93% Scarcity Theory of Value // The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Growth, Distribution and Structural Change. Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti / M. Baranzini, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1993. P. 149-172.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time // Capital Theory / C. J. Bliss, A. J. Cohen, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, 2005, Vol. I. P. xxvii-lx.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time // Capital Theory / C. J. Bliss, A. J. Cohen, G. C. Harcourt (eds.). Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, 2005, Vol. I. P. xxvii-lx.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time. P. xxvii-lx.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen A., Harcourt G. Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time. P. xxvii-lx.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dixit A. The Accumulation of Capital Theory // Oxford Economic Papers. 1977. Vol. 29, No 1. P. 1-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dixit A. The Accumulation of Capital Theory // Oxford Economic Papers. 1977. Vol. 29, No 1. P. 1-29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felipe J. Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns, and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the Evidence // Metroeconomica. 2001. Vol. 52, No 4. P. 391-427.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felipe J., Fisher F. Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know // Metroeconomica. 2003. Vol. 54, No 2. P. 208-262.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felipe J., Fisher F. Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know // Metroeconomica. 2003. Vol. 54, No 2. P. 208-262.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felipe J., McCombie J. A Problem with Some Estimations and Interpretations of the Mark-up in Manufacturing Industry // International Review of Applied Economics. 2002. Vol. 16, No 2. P. 187-215.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felipe J., McCombie J. A Problem with Some Estimations and Interpretations of the Mark-up in Manufacturing Industry // International Review of Applied Economics. 2002. Vol. 16, No 2. P. 187-215.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felipe J., McCombie J. Some Methodological Problems with the Neoclassical Analysis of the East Asian Miracle // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 54, No 5. P. 695-721.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felipe J., McCombie J. Some Methodological Problems with the Neoclassical Analysis of the East Asian Miracle // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 54, No 5. P. 695-721.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher F. Adjustment Processes and Stability // The New Palgrave: General Equilibrium. John Eatwell / M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). N. Y.: Norton, 1989. P. 36-42;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher F. Adjustment Processes and Stability // The New Palgrave: General Equilibrium. John Eatwell / M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). N. Y.: Norton, 1989. P. 36-42;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher F. Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1971. Vol. 53, No 4. P. 325.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher F. Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1971. Vol. 53, No 4. P. 325.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher F. Aggregation: Aggregate Production Functions and Related Topics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher F. Aggregation: Aggregate Production Functions and Related Topics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher F. The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions // Econometrica. 1969. Vol. 37, No 4. P. 553-577.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher F. The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions // Econometrica. 1969. Vol. 37, No 4. P. 553-577.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher I. The Rate of Interest: Its Nature, Determination, and Relation to Economic Phenomena. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1907.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher I. The Rate of Interest: Its Nature, Determination, and Relation to Economic Phenomena. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1907.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher I. The Theory of Interest. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1930.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher I. The Theory of Interest. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1930.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garegnani P. Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution // Review of Economic Studies. 1970. Vol. 37, No 3. P. 407-436.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garegnani P. Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution // Review of Economic Studies. 1970. Vol. 37, No 3. P. 407-436.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goodwin R. A Growth Cycle // Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb / C. Feinstein (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. P. 54-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goodwin R. A Growth Cycle // Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb / C. Feinstein (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. P. 54-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hahn F. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984. P. 53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hahn F. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984. P. 53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hahn F. General Equilibrium Theory // The Crisis in Economic Theory / D. Bell, I. Kristol (eds.). N. Y.: Basic Books, 1981. P. 128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hahn F. General Equilibrium Theory // The Crisis in Economic Theory / D. Bell, I. Kristol (eds.). N. Y.: Basic Books, 1981. P. 128.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hahn F. The Share of Wages in the National Income. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1972. P. 8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hahn F. The Share of Wages in the National Income. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1972. P. 8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital // Journal of Economic Literature. 1969. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 369-405.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital // Journal of Economic Literature. 1969. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 369-405.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harcourt G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harcourt G. C. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons - or Dead End? // Oxford Economic Papers. 1976. Vol. 28, No 1. P. 26-65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harcourt G. C. The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons - or Dead End? // Oxford Economic Papers. 1976. Vol. 28, No 1. P. 26-65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hayek F. The Pure Theory of Capital. L.: Routledge, 1941.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayek F. The Pure Theory of Capital. L.: Routledge, 1941.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hennings K. The Exchange Paradigm and the Theory of Production and Distribution // Foundations of Economics / M. Baranzini, R. Scazzieri (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hennings K. The Exchange Paradigm and the Theory of Production and Distribution // Foundations of Economics / M. Baranzini, R. Scazzieri (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ingrao B., Israel G. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ingrao B., Israel G. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaldor N. Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy. The 1984 Raffaele Mattioli Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaldor N. Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy. The 1984 Raffaele Mattioli Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaldor N. On the Theory of Capital: A Rejoinder to Professor Knight // Econometrica. 1938. Vol. 6, No 2. P. 14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaldor N. On the Theory of Capital: A Rejoinder to Professor Knight // Econometrica. 1938. Vol. 6, No 2. P. 14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kalecki M. Trend and Business Cycles Reconsidered // Economic Journal. 1968. Vol. 78, No 310. P. 263-276;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalecki M. Trend and Business Cycles Reconsidered // Economic Journal. 1968. Vol. 78, No 310. P. 263-276;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knight F. Professor Fisher's Interest Theory: A Case in Point // Journal of Political Economy. 1931. Vol. 39, No 2. P. 210.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knight F. Professor Fisher's Interest Theory: A Case in Point // Journal of Political Economy. 1931. Vol. 39, No 2. P. 210.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levhari D. A Nonsubstitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1965. Vol. 79, No 1. P. 98-105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levhari D. A Nonsubstitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1965. Vol. 79, No 1. P. 98-105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCombie J. The Solow Residual, Technical Change and Aggregate Production Functions // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2000-2001. Vol. 23, No 2. P. 267-297; errata. Vol. 23, No 3. P. 544.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCombie J. The Solow Residual, Technical Change and Aggregate Production Functions // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2000-2001. Vol. 23, No 2. P. 267-297; errata. Vol. 23, No 3. P. 544.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paradoxes in Capital Theory: A Symposium / P. Samuelson (ed.) // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-583.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Paradoxes in Capital Theory: A Symposium / P. Samuelson (ed.) // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-583.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Again on Capital Theory and Solow's 'Rate of Return' // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 428-431.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Again on Capital Theory and Solow's 'Rate of Return' // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 428-431.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 503-517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 383-431.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 383-431.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Structural Economic Dynamics. A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Structural Economic Dynamics. A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pasinetti L. Switches of Technique and the 'Rate of Return' in Capital Theory // Economic Journal. 1969. Vol. 79, No 315. P. 503-531.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasinetti L. Switches of Technique and the 'Rate of Return' in Capital Theory // Economic Journal. 1969. Vol. 79, No 315. P. 503-531.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Persky J. The Neoclassical Advent: American Economics at the Turn of the 20th Century // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 95-108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Persky J. The Neoclassical Advent: American Economics at the Turn of the 20th Century // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 95-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phelps Brown E. H. The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1957. Vol. 71. P. 546-560.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phelps Brown E. H. The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1957. Vol. 71. P. 546-560.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. Capital Theory up to Date // Canadian Journal of Economics. 1970. Vol. 3, No 2. P. 309-317.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. Capital Theory up to Date // Canadian Journal of Economics. 1970. Vol. 3, No 2. P. 309-317.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. Collected Economic Papers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1980 [1974]. Vol. 5. P. vii.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. Collected Economic Papers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1980 [1974]. Vol. 5. P. vii.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. History Versus Equilibrium // Collected Economic Papers. Vol. 5. P. 57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. History Versus Equilibrium // Collected Economic Papers. Vol. 5. P. 57.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. Imperfect Competition Revisited // Economic Journal. 1953. Vol. 63, No 251. P. 590.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. Imperfect Competition Revisited // Economic Journal. 1953. Vol. 63, No 251. P. 590.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. Reswitching: Reply // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. Reswitching: Reply // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-1954. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital // Review of Economic Studies. 1953-1954. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. The Unimportance of Reswitching // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 32-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. The Unimportance of Reswitching // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1975. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 32-39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samuelson P. A Summing Up // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 568-583.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samuelson P. A Summing Up // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1966. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 568-583.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samuelson P. Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function // Review of Economic Studies. 1962. Vol. 29, No 3. P. 193-206.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samuelson P. Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function // Review of Economic Studies. 1962. Vol. 29, No 3. P. 193-206.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schefold B. Paradoxes of Capital and Counterintuitive Changes of Distribution in an Intertemporal Equilibrium Model // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics / H. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 363-391.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schefold B. Paradoxes of Capital and Counterintuitive Changes of Distribution in an Intertemporal Equilibrium Model // Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics / H. Kurz (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 363-391.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II // Growth, Profits and Property. Essays in the Revival of Political Economy. E. J. Nell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. P. 80-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: Humbug II // Growth, Profits and Property. Essays in the Revival of Political Economy. E. J. Nell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. P. 80-95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit63"><label>63</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1974. Vol. 56, No 1. P. 115-120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1974. Vol. 56, No 1. P. 115-120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit64"><label>64</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simon H. Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations // American Economic Review. 1979. Vol. 69, No 4. P. 493-513.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simon H. Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations // American Economic Review. 1979. Vol. 69, No 4. P. 493-513.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit65"><label>65</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, No 1. P. 65-94;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, No 1. P. 65-94;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit66"><label>66</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. Capital Theory and the Rate of Return. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1963.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. Capital Theory and the Rate of Return. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1963.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit67"><label>67</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. On the Rate of Return: Reply to Pasinetti // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 423-428.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. On the Rate of Return: Reply to Pasinetti // Economic Journal. 1970. Vol. 80, No 318. P. 423-428.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit68"><label>68</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957. Vol. 39, No 3. P. 312-320.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957. Vol. 39, No 3. P. 312-320.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit69"><label>69</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 349-381.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. The Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution // Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2000. Vol. 53, No 215. P. 349-381.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit70"><label>70</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sraffa P. Comment // The Theory of Capital. F. A. Lutz, D. C. Hague (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1961. P. 305-306.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sraffa P. Comment // The Theory of Capital. F. A. Lutz, D. C. Hague (eds.). L.: Macmillan, 1961. P. 305-306.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit71"><label>71</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sraffa P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities-Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sraffa P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities-Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit72"><label>72</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sraffa P. Production of Commodities: a comment // Economic Journal. 1962. Vol. 72, No 286. P. 479.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sraffa P. Production of Commodities: a comment // Economic Journal. 1962. Vol. 72, No 286. P. 479.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit73"><label>73</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swan T. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation // Economic Record. 1956. Vol. 32, No 2. P. 343-361.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Swan T. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation // Economic Record. 1956. Vol. 32, No 2. P. 343-361.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit74"><label>74</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution / G. Caravale (ed.). Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 1976.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution / G. Caravale (ed.). Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 1976.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit75"><label>75</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Veblen T. Professor Clark's Economics // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1908. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 147-195.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veblen T. Professor Clark's Economics // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1908. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 147-195.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit76"><label>76</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Walsh V., Gram H. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1980.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Walsh V., Gram H. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit77"><label>77</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wicksell K. Lectures on Political Economy. Vol. 1. L.: George Routledge &amp;amp; Sons, 1911 [1934]. P. 149.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wicksell K. Lectures on Political Economy. Vol. 1. L.: George Routledge &amp;amp; Sons, 1911 [1934]. P. 149.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit78"><label>78</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yeager L. Toward Understanding Some Paradoxes in Capital Theory // Economic Inquiry. 1976. Vol. 14, No 3. P. 313-346.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yeager L. Toward Understanding Some Paradoxes in Capital Theory // Economic Inquiry. 1976. Vol. 14, No 3. P. 313-346.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
