

Crossing the Borders: Mccloskey and Humanistic Approach to Economics (on the book by D. MCcloskey “Rhetoric of Economics”)
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-4-142-151
Abstract
About the Author
D. RaskovRussian Federation
References
1. Ananyin O. I. (2005). Economic theory: Structure of knowledge. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
2. Barthes R. (1994). The death of the author. In: Barthes R. Selected works: Semiotics, poetics. Moscow: Progress, pp. 384—391. (In Russian).
3. Boldyrev I. (2011). Economic methodology today: A review of major contributions. Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii, No. 9, pp. 47—70. (In Russian).
4. Zaostrovtsev A. (2014). An economist on history: Deirdre McCloskey’s perspective. Voprosy Economiki, No. 12, pp. 129—146. (In Russian).
5. Zaostrovtsev A. P. (2014). On the development and backwardness: how do economists explain history? St. Petersburg: European University in St. Petersburg Publ. (In Russian).
6. Klamer A. (2015). Speaking of economics. How to get in the conversation. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
7. McCloskey D. (1993). Does the past have useful economics? THESIS, Iss. 1, pp. 107—136. (In Russian).
8. McCloskey D. (2011). The rhetoric of economics. In: Istoki: socio-cultural contexts of economic activity and economic knowledge. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
9. McCloskey D. (2012). The rhetoric of this economics. In: D. Hausman (ed.). The Philosophy of Economics. An antology. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., pp. 399—341. (In Russian).
10. McCloskey D. (2013). Economics ad hominem or humanomics. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo Universiteta. Seria 5: Economika, Iss. 3, pp. 37—40. (In Russian).
11. McCloskey D. (2015) The rhetoric of economics. 2nd ed. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publ.; Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences of St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
12. Otmakhov P. A. (2000). “The rhetoric” concept of method in economics: the preliminary results of development. In: Istoki: the topics in economic history and history of economic thought, Iss. 4. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 138—176. (In Russian).
13. Raskov D. E. (2005). Economics as a rhetoric. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seria 5: Economika, Iss. 3, pp. 13—30. (In Russian).
14. Boumans M., Davis J. B. (2010). Economic methodology: Understanding economics as a science. Basingstoke, N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. Brown V. (1994). The Economy as Text. In: R. Backhouse (ed.). New directions in economic methodology. London: Routledge, pp. 368-382.
15. Henderson W. (1994). Metaphor and Economics. In: R. Backhouse (ed.). New Directions in Economic methodology. London: Routledge, pp. 343-367.
16. Mäki U. (1995). Diagnosing McCloskey. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 1300-1318.
17. McCloskey D. N. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
18. McCloskey D. N. (1994). 1780-1860: a survey. In: Floud R., McCloskey D. (eds.). The economic history of Britain since 1700. 2nd ed. Vol. I. 1700-1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242-270.
19. McCloskey D. N. (1996). The vices of economists - The virtues of the bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
20. McCloskey D. N. (1999). Crossing: A memoir. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
21. McCloskey D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity. Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
22. Ziliak S. T., McCloskey D. N. (2007). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice and lives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Review
For citations:
Raskov D. Crossing the Borders: Mccloskey and Humanistic Approach to Economics (on the book by D. MCcloskey “Rhetoric of Economics”). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2015;(4):142-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-4-142-151