

The Effects of Path Dependence and Economy of Scale in Russian legislature
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-11-58-82
Abstract
About the Authors
S. KirdinaRussian Federation
A. Rubinstein
Russian Federation
References
1. Glazkova L. (2013). The Law Is not a Vaccine but a Large-scale Measure of Social Reaction // Rossiyskaya Federatsiya Segodnya. No 1. P. 21—23.
2. Buchanan J. (1997). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Moscow: Taurus Alfa.
3. Kirdina S. G., Rubinstein A. A., Tolmacheva I. V. (2009). Database LAWSTREAM.RU: Quantitative Assessment of Institutional Change. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS.
4. Kirdina S., Kirilyuk I., Rubinstein A., Tolmacheva I. (2010a). Russian Model of Institutional Change: Empirical-Statistical Research // Voprosy Ekonomiki. No 11. P. 97—114.
5. Kirdina S. G., Rubinstein A. A., Tolmacheva I. V. (2010b). Some Quantitative Assessment of Institutional Change: The Case of the Russian Legislation Study // TERRA ECONOMICUS. Vol. 8, No 3. P. 8—22.
6. Kirdina S. G., Rubinstein A. A. (2013). Increasing Returns of Russian Power (Analysis of the Legislative Process, 1994—2012) // Phenomenon of Increasing Returns in Economy and Politics / S. G. Kirdina, V. I. Mayevsky (eds.). St. Petersburg: Aletheia. P. 131—167.
7. Kirdina S. G., Shatalova T. Yu. (2013). Increasing Returns in the Modern Economic Literature: Content Analysis of Russian and Foreign Sources // Phenomenon of Increasing Returns in Economy and Politics / S. G. Kirdina, V. I. Mayevsky (eds.). St. ¬Petersburg: Aletheia. P. 18—54.
8. Malko A. V. (2002). Theory of State and Law in Questions and Answers. 4th ed. Moscow: Yurist.
9. Nikiforov M. V. (2012). Subjects of Administrative Rulemaking. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya Pravovaya Akademiya.
10. Krasheninnikov P. V. (ed.) (2012). Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Statut.
11. Remington T. (2004). Democratization, the Separation of Powers and the Scope of Government Authority in Russia // Sravnitelnoe Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie. No 4. P. 26—40.
12. Remington T. (2005). Support for the President by the Russian State Duma // Sravnitelnoe Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie. No 3. P. 18—32.
13. Strashun E. G. (ed.) (2009). Constitutional (State) Law of Foreign Countries. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: BEK.
14. Strygina I. A. (2011). Participation of the Government of the Russian Federation in the Legislative Process as a Vital Topic of the Constitutional Law Branch // Actual Problems of Law: Proceedings of the International scientific conference. Moscow: Vash Poligraficheskiy Partner.
15. Shuvalov I. I. (2004). The Government of the Russian Federation in the Legislative Process. Moscow: Norma.
16. Schulman E. (2013). How to Fix a Rabid Printer // Vedomosti. July 5.
17. Anderson P., Cachon G. P., Zipkin P. H. (1999). Complexity Theory and Organization Science // Organization Science. Vol. 10, No 3. P. 216-232.
18. Arthur B. W. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events // The Economic Journal. Vol. 99, No 394. P. 116-132.
19. Arthur B. W. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependency in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Boeker W. (1988). Organizational Origins: Entrepreneurial and Environmental Imprinting at the Time of Founding // Ecological Models of Organizations / G. Carroll (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Ballinge.
21. David P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY // American Economic Review. Vol. 75, No 2. P. 332-337.
22. David P. A. (1986). Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History // Economic History and the Modern Economist / W. N. Parker (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. David P. A. (2001). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for “Historical Economics” // Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present / P. Garrouste (ed.). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edgar Elgar. P. 15-40.
24. Koch J., Eisend M., Petermann A. (2009). Path Dependence in Decision-making Processes: Exploring the Impact of Complexity under Increasing Returns // Business Research. Vol. 2, No 1. P. 67-84.
25. Mahoney J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology // Theory and Society. Vol. 29, No 4. P. 507-648.
26. Marshall A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Vol. 1. L.: Macmillan. Pierson P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics // American Political Science Review. Vol. 94, No 2. P. 251-267.
27. Pierson P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. (2005). Organizational Paths: Path Dependency and Beyond / Paper presented at the 21st EGOS Colloquium, Berlin, Germany.
29. Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. (2009). Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 34, No 4. P. 689-709.
30. Thambisetty S. (2009). Increasing Returns in the Patent System: Institutional Sources and Consequences for Law // LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers. No 7/2009.
Review
For citations:
Kirdina S., Rubinstein A. The Effects of Path Dependence and Economy of Scale in Russian legislature. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014;(11):58-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-11-58-82