Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Replication is an indispensable feature of the scientific publications in economics today
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-7-134-148
Abstract
The development of text-generating artificial intelligence systems frightens scholars: at first glance, articles by real researchers may be displaced by fabricated publications — fully invented or written on invented data. The modern history of academic research is full of such cases. However, journal editorial boards’ requirement that authors submit the data and code used in their work (the replication package), combined with the editorial team’s check of reproducibility before reviewers see the manuscript, substantially reduces the risks of publishing dishonest texts — especially when authors also supply log-files and research diaries.
References
1. Voprosy Ekonomiki (2004). Beware of plagiarism! Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 156—157. (In Russian).
2. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2024). Youth of econometrics: Keynesians contra Keynes. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 120—147. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-11-120-147
3. Kozyrev A. N. (2024). Multidisciplinary approach as a chance to save economic science (from economists). Tsifrovaya Ekonomika, No. 27, pp. 5—15. (In Russian).
4. Maltsev A. A., Shastitko A. E. (2025). Where is the nostalgic empiricism of the new new institutionalists leading economics? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 5—31. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-12-5-31
5. Applied Econometrics (2008). Attention, plagiarism! Applied Econometrics, No. 3, p. 137. (In Russian).
6. Ritchie S. (2024). Science fictions: How fraud, bias, negligence, and hype undermine the search for truth hardcover. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
7. Hayek F. (2020). The market and other orders. In: Collected works, in 19th vols., Vol. 15. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. (In Russian).
8. Khramov K. O., Frenkel E. E., Kucher M. I. (2018). Mathematical failure of Kopernik’s system. In: Proceedings of the X International Student Scientific Conference “Student Scientific Forum”. (In Russian). https://files.scienceforum.ru/pdf/2018/854.pdf
9. Aitken M., Cumming D., Zhan F. (2023). Algorithmic trading and market quality: International evidence of the impact of errors in colocation dates. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 151, article 106843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106843
10. BCBS (2005). Studies on the validation on internal rating systems. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
11. Borwein J. J., Bailey D. H. (2013). The Reinhart—Rogoff error — or how not to Excel at economics. Conversation, April 22. https://theconversation.com/the-reinhartrogoff-error-or-how-not-to-excel-at-economics-13646
12. Epstein E. H., Lee G. W. (2025). Harvard sues ex-HBS professor Gino for defamation, accusing her of falsifying evidence. Harvard Crimson, September 12. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/9/12/harvard-sues-gino/
13. Herbert S., Kingi H., Stanchi F., Vilhuber L. (2023). The reproducibility of economics research: A case study. Banque de France Working Paper, No. 853. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4325149
14. Kumar S. (2025). Agile in academia: Managing research projects. Agile PM Works. https://agilepmworks.com/blog/agile-in-academia-managing-research-projects/ (дата обращения: 22.10.2025).
15. Lavietes M., Flowers V. (2025). What to know as Harvard professor Francesca Gino’s tenure is revoked amid data fraud investigation. NBC News, May 27. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/know-harvard-professor-francesca-gino-tenurerevoked-data-fraud-invest-rcna209219
16. Lewis-Kraus G. (2023). They studied dishonesty. Was their work a lie? New Yorker, September 30. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/10/09/they-studieddishonesty-was-their-work-a-lie
17. Miller S. V. (2022). Revisiting Reinhart and Rogoff, ten years later. April 20. http://svmiller.com/blog/2020/04/reinhart-rogoff-ten-years-later-replication/
18. O’Grady C. (2024). Embattled Harvard honesty professor accused of plagiarism. Academic chapter and two books by Francesca Gino appear to copy from student theses, blogs, and news reports. Science, Vol. 384, pp. 148—149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp7470
19. Schafmeister F. (2021). The effect of replications on citation patterns: Evidence from a large-scale reproducibility project. Psychological Science, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1537—1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211005767
20. Serra-Garcia M., Gneezy U. (2021). Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones. Science Advances, Vol. 7, No. 21, article eabd1705. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705
Review
For citations:
Penikas H.I. Replication is an indispensable feature of the scientific publications in economics today. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(7):134-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-7-134-148
Views:
437
JATS XML
Email this article 