Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The evolution of the mechanism of social development: An attempt at a four-factor analysis
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-4-5-26
Abstract
In the author’s 2018 papers, an attempt was made to describe the mechanism of the evolution of Western countries from the 14th to the 20th centuries as the interaction of four groups of factors: technological progress, civic culture, institutions, and welfare. The focus was on the ascending branch of the evolution of Western countries. In this paper the results obtained are clarified, and a hypothesis is proposed that the potential of this mechanism has been exhausted, giving rise to a crisis in the economic and political systems of these countries, as well as in the system of international relations. It is shown that this crisis has resulted from a number of trends: a slowdown in technological progress and the spread of distorted innovations, a decline in economic growth, a decay of civic culture associated with the effect of destructive altruism, and the degradation of institutions of competition caused by the “dirty hands problem”. Trump’s policies, largely driven by the imperial syndrome characteristic of the US ruling elite, are incapable of reversing these trends and are leading to the destruction of the world order. The paper also discusses the hypothesis that a possible way out of the crisis may lie in the formation of institutions of cooperation through the combined efforts of the European Union and Russia.
Keywords
technological progress,
civic culture,
institutions,
welfare,
distorted innovation,
problem of dirty hands,
imperial syndrome
JEL: D72, D73, K16, O10, O33, P10
About the Author
V. M. Polterovich
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Acemoglu D., Johnson S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
2. Balatskiy E. V. (2021). The principle of consistency in social development theory. Terra Economicus, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 36—52. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-1-36-52
3. Balatsky E. V. (2023). Institutional erosion and economic growth. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 81—101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.4
4. Balatsky E., Yurevich M. (2022) Consistency principle: Theory and empirical evidence. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 35—48. https://doi.org/0.17323/2500-2597.2022.3.35.48
5. Welzel C. (2017). Freedom rising. Moscow: VTsIOM. (In Russian).
6. Diamond J. M. (2010). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
7. McAuliffe M., Oucho L. A. (2024). World migration report 2024. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
8. Mikitchuk M. D. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of altruistic behavior. Economics and Mathematical Methods, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 28—44. (In Russian). https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S042473880021695-3
9. North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. (2011). Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
10. Pluckrose H., Lindsay J. (2022). Cynical theories: How universities made everything about race, gender and identity — and why this harms everybody. Moscow: Individuum. (In Russian).
11. Polterovich V. (2007). Elements of the theory of reforms. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).
12. Polterovich V. M. (2018a). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 1. Geography, institutions, or culture? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 5—26. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-11-5-26
13. Polterovich V. M. (2018b). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 77—102. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102
14. Polterovich V. M. (2021). Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 52—72. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72
15. Polterovich V. M. Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 1. The seven of European leaders. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 31—43. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.2
16. Polterovich V. M. (2022b). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership — collaborative advantage. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 42—57. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2
17. Acemoglu D. (2023). Distorted innovation: Does the market get the direction of technology right? A. E. R. Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 113, pp. 1—28. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/pandp.20231000
18. Acemoglu D., Johnson S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.
19. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
20. Akcigit U., Kerr W. R., Nicholas T. (2013). The mechanics of endogenous innovation and growth: Еvidence from historical U.S. patents. Working Paper, Harvard University.
21. Alesina A., Giuliano P. (2015). Culture and institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 898—944. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.4.898
22. Anechiarico F., Jacobs J. B. (1996). The pursuit of absolute integrity: How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Asheim G. B., Nesje F. (2016). Destructive intergenerational altruism. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 957—984. https://doi.org/10.1086/688584
24. Axelrod R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
25. Benders D. S. (2011). Student apathy: The downfall of education. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1968613
26. Bertaut C., von Beschwitz B., Curcuru S. (2025). The international role of the U.S. dollar — 2025 edition. FEDS Notes, July 18. https://doi.org/10.17016/2380-7172.3856
27. Bonaiuti M. (2018). Are we entering the age of involuntary degrowth? Promethean technologies and declining returns of innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 197, pp. 1800—1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.196
28. Chang H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategies in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.
29. Dans E., Groves S. (2023). Mandate for leadership: The conservative promise. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
30. De Groot B. (2006). Essays on economic cycles. Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
31. Farhan R. (2019). Understanding postmodernism: Philosophy and culture of postmodern. International Journal Social Sciences and Education, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 22—31.
32. Fitzpatrick M., Berman J. (2016). Cultural dissonance in tertiary education. MAI Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 137—149. https://doi.org/10.20507/MAIJournal.2016.5.2.4
33. Gabor A. (2005). Guns for the sultan: Military power and the weapons industry in the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Gold E. R. (2021). The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science. Research Policy, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 104—226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226
35. Gorodnichenko Y., Roland G. (2017). Culture, institutions, and the wealth of nations. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 402—416. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00599
36. Korinek A., Schindler M., Stiglitz J. E. (2022). Technological progress and artificial intelligence. In: V. Cerra, B. Eichengreen, A. El-Ganainy, M. Schindler (eds.). How to achieve inclusive growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163—211. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846938.003.0005
37. Korinek A., Stiglitz J. E. (2025). Steering technological progress. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Papers, No. 232. https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp232
38. Kose M. A., F. Ohnsorge (eds.) (2023). Falling long-term growth prospects: Trends, expectations and policies. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/39497
39. Li H. (2020). Low motivation of youth in 21st century: A case study of the US, China, and Japan. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Humanities Educationand Social Sciences (ICHESS 2020), pp. 272—276. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.506
40. Liu W. L., McKibbin W. (2025). Long term projections of the world economy. CAMA Working Paper, No. 31/2025. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Australian National University.
41. Makhlouf Y. (2023). Trends in income inequality: Еvidence from developing and developed countries. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 165, No. 1, pp. 213—243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03010-8
42. Mokyr J. (2006). The great synergy: Тhe European Enlightenment as a factor in modern economic growth. In: W. Dolfsma, L. Soete (еds.). Understanding the dynamics of a knowledge economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1—41. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845429898.00008
43. Mokyr J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dft
44. Ng E., Fitzsimmons T., Kulkarni M., Ozturk M. B., April K., Banerjee R., Muhr S. L. (2025). The anti-DEI agenda: Navigating the impact of Trump’s second term on diversity, equity and inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 137—150. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2025-0116
45. Oakley B., Knafo A., Madhavan G., Wilson D. S. (2011). Pathological altruism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738571.001.0001
46. Park M., Leahey E., Funk R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, Vol. 613, pp. 138—144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x
47. Park M., Leahey E., Funk R. J. (2025). Robust evidence for declining disruptiveness: Assessing the role of zero-backward-citation works. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00184 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.00184
48. Smola K. W., Sutton C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 363—382. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.147
49. Sheenan P. (2004). Postmodernism and philosophy. In: S. Connor (ed.). The Cambridge companion to postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, рp. 20—42. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521640520.002
50. Schmidt G. B., Park G., Keeney J., Ghumman S. (2017). Job apathy: Scale development and initial validation. Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 484—501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599536
51. Strulik H. (2012). Patience and prosperity. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 147, pp. 336—352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2011.10.008
52. Strumsky D., Lobo J., van der Leeuw S. (2011). Measuring the relative importance of reusing, recombining and creating technologies in the process of invention. SFI Working Paper, No. 2011-02-003. Santa Fe Institute.
53. Zeira J. (2011). Innovations, patent races and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 135—156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9066-1
Review
For citations:
Polterovich V.M. The evolution of the mechanism of social development: An attempt at a four-factor analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(4):5-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-4-5-26
Views:
523
JATS XML
Email this article 