Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Сведения о реформе регулирования достаточности капитала исламских банков сильно преувеличены

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-2-143-158

Аннотация

В связи с началом в России эксперимента в области партнерского (исламского) финансирования к этой теме в публичной сфере, включая академическую среду, стали обращаться все чаще. Показано, что в статье Г. И. Пеникаса и В. Ю. Стефаненко «Реформа регулирования достаточности капитала исламских банков», опубликованной в «Вопросах экономики» № 8, 2024 г., многие предпосылки неточны, что привело к ошибочной постановке вопроса, а также к тому, что использованный эконометрический аппарат не доказывает наличие связи между ростом интереса инвесторов к исламским банкам и «реформой 2013 года». 

Об авторе

А. Ю. Журавлёв
Институт востоковедения РАН
Россия

Журавлев Андрей Юрьевич, к. э. н., с. н. с. Центра арабских и исламских исследований 

Москва



Список литературы

1. Журавлев А. Ю. (2022). Регулирование исламских банков и предполагаемые ограничения секулярной правовой среды // Арабский Восток в лабиринте социальноэкономических проблем: коллективная монография / Под ред. А. О. Филоника. М.: ИВ РАН. С. 82—125.

2. Пеникаc Г. И., Стефаненко В. Ю. (2024). Реформа регулирования достаточности капитала исламских банков // Вопросы экономики. № 8. С. 89—110. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-8-89-110

3. AAOIFI (2024). AAOIFI Financial accounting standard (FAS) 45. Quasi-equity (Including investment accounts). Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.

4. ADIB (2023). ADIB annual report 2023. Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank.

5. Al Rajhi Bank (2023). Annual report 2023. Al Salam Bank (2023). Annual report 2023.

6. Bank Negara Malaysia (2011). Guidelines on the recognition and measurement of profit sharing investment account as risk absorbent. Central Bank of Malaysia, July 22.

7. Bank Negara Malaysia (2020). Capital adequacy framework for Islamic banks (Capital components). Central Bank of Malaysia, February 5.

8. Bank Rakyat (2023). Annual report 2023. BIS (2012). Core principles for effective banking supervision. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements.

9. BIS (2025). The Basel framework. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements.

10. CBK (2023). Financial stability report 2023. Central Bank of Kuwait.

11. DinarStandard (2024). The state of the global Islamic economy 2023/24 report.

12. IFSB (2005). Capital adequacy standard for institutions (other than insurance institutions) offering only Islamic financial services. Islamic Financial Services Board, December.

13. IFSB (2011). Guidance note in connection with the IFSB capital adequacy standard: The determination of alpha in the capital adequacy ratio for institutions (other than insurance institutions) offering only Islamic Financial Services. Islamic Financial Services Board, March.

14. IFSB (2013). Revised capital adequacy standard for institutions offering Islamic financial services [excluding Islamic insurance (Takāful) institutions and Islamic collective investment schemes]. Islamic Financial Services Board, December.

15. IFSB (2021). Revised capital adequacy standard for institutions offering Islamic financial services [banking segment]. Islamic Financial Services Board, December.

16. IFSB (2023). Islamic financial services industry stability report: Navigating a challenging global financial condition. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Financial Services Board.

17. IMF (2003). United Arab Emirates: Financial system stability assessment, including reports on the observance of standards and codes on the following topics: Monetary and financial policy transparency, banking supervision and payment systems. IMF Country Report, No. 2003/020. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451801088.002

18. IMF (2004). Kuwait: Financial system stability assessment, including reports on the observance of standards and codes on the following topics: Banking supervision, securities regulation, anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. IMF Country Report, No. 2004/151. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451822298.002

19. IMF (2006a). Kingdom of Bahrain: Financial system stability assessment, including reports on the observance of standards and codes on the following topics, banking supervision, insurance supervision, securities regulation, and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. IMF Country Report, No. 2006/091. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451804607.002

20. IMF (2006b). Saudi Arabia: Financial system stability assessment, including reports on the observance of standards and codes on the following topics, monetary and financial policy transparency, banking supervision, and payment systems. IMF Country Report, No. 2006/199. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451833508.002

21. IMF (2013). Malaysia: Publication of financial sector assessment program documentation — detailed assessment of basel core principles for effective banking supervision. IMF Country Report, No. 2013/56. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475514773.002

22. KPMG (2016). GCC listed banks’ results: A new paradigm. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, April.

23. KPMG (2017). GCC listed banks’ results: Navigating through change. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, June.

24. KPMG (2018). GCC listed banks’ results: Shifting horizons. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, April.

25. KPMG (2019). GCC listed banks’ results: Embracing digital. Appendix report. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, June.

26. KPMG (2020). GCC listed banks’ results: New age banking. Appendix report. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, July.

27. KPMG (2021). GCC listed banks’ results: Banking redefined. Appendix report. KPMG Middle East and South Asia, July.

28. Kuveyt Türk (2023). Annual report 2023: Sustainable inclusive growth.

29. Louati S., Abida I. G., Boujelbene Y. (2015). Capital adequacy implications on Islamic and non-Islamic bank’s behavior: Does market power matter? Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, рр. 192—204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2015.04.001

30. Mateev M., Nasr T., Nair K. (2024). Navigating crisis: marketing dynamics and resilience in the MENA’s dual-banking system amidst the SAR-COV-2 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 11, article 1248. https:// doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03675-1

31. Penikas H., Stefanenko V. (2021). Identifying the core driver for the Islamic banking capital adequacy regulation. Ihtifaz: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking, Vol. 4, pp. 81—96. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v4i2.4531

32. QIB (2023). Annual report 2023. Qatar Islamic Bank.

33. SBP (2020). Guidelines on stress testing 2020. Annexure A of FSD Circular No. 01 of 2020. State Bank of Pakistan, Financial Stability Department.


Дополнительные файлы

Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Журавлёв А.Ю. Сведения о реформе регулирования достаточности капитала исламских банков сильно преувеличены. Вопросы экономики. 2025;(2):143-158. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-2-143-158

For citation:


Juravliov A.Y. The reports of a reform of capital adequacy regulation of Islamic banks are greatly exaggerated. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(2):143-158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-2-143-158

Просмотров: 288


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)