|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Changes in antitrust regulation and merger activity in Russia: Price manipulations and need for additional antitrust scrutiny
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-94-109
Abstract
Antitrust regulation is constantly evolving that enables the Federal Antitrust Service of Russia to timely respond to new economic and technological changes. The latest amendments to the antitrust law which came into force on September 1, 2023 include changes to the regulation of mergers and acquisitions and add a new criterion for a deal approval. In this study, we evaluate short-term effects of the changes in antitrust merger regulation and identify stealth mergers. We use data from the mergers.ru (Mergers and Acquisitions in Russia) to test hypotheses about possible effects of regulatory changes. We use the McCrary test (manipulation test) to reveal if there is continuity in the distribution of mergers prices and find a persistent discontinuity at the new threshold for deal price (7 billion rubles) both after the adoption of the amendments (from June 27, 2023) and after their implementation (from September 1, 2023). This may indicate the presence of manipulations in deal prices, which in the future can possibly lead to higher prices and distortions in innovation efforts.
Supporting agencies: This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 24-78-00164).
About the Authors
O. A. Markova
https://www.econ.msu.ru/departments/cip/staff/Markova/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Olga A. Markova.
Moscow
A. Y. Stavniychuk
https://www.econ.msu.ru/departments/cip/staff/stavniychuk/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Anna Y. Stavniychuk.
Moscow
References
1. Avdasheva S. B., Korneeva D. V. (2016). Competition policy in export-oriented markets: Whether remedies are really effective? HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 442—470. (In Russian).
2. Avdasheva S. B., Tsytsulina D. V., Sidorova E. E. (2015). The use оf key performance indicators for the FAS: Analysis based on the statistics of adjudications. Public Administration Issues, No. 3, pp. 7—34. (In Russian).
3. Avdasheva S., Shastitko A. (2005). Modernization of antimonopoly policy in Russia (Economic analysis of proposed changes in the competition law). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 100—116. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-5-100-116
4. Avdasheva S. B., Shastitko A. E. (2008). Ex ante merger control in Russia: Changes of efficiency of antitrust legislation. Journal of Modern Competition, No. 5, pp. 15—27. (In Russian).
5. Avdasheva S. B., Shastitko A. E. (2010). Competition policy: Composition, structure, system. Journal of Modern Competition, No. 1, pp. 5—20. (In Russian).
6. Kopytok V. K. (2022). Unemployment benefits and duration of registered unemployment in Russia: Regression kink design. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 156—175. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-54-2-8
7. Pavlova N. S., Markova O. A. (2023). Transactions involving digital companies in the context of the fifth antimonopoly package. Konkurentsiya i Pravo, No. 3. (In Russian).
8. Puzyrevsky S. (2013). Amendments to antitrust legislation: Content and expected consequences. Khozyaistvo i Pravo, No. 12, pp. 3—18. (In Russian).
9. Stavniychuk A. Y. (2020). The effects of antimonopoly policy on oil products markets in Russia. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 40—68. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2020-12-2-40-68
10. Stavniychuk A. Y., Pavlova N. S. (2023). Antitrust’s effects: Lessons for evidence-based policy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 68—90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-68-90
11. Sukhorukova K. A., Avdasheva S. B. (2013). Merger: Is it an incentive to use market power or efficiency gains? Analysis of effects of three horizontal mergers in highly-concentrated industries. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 3—24. (In Russian).
12. Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S. (2018). Wide prospects and ravines of competition policy. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 110—133. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-5-110-133
13. Avdasheva S., Tsytsulina D., Golovanova S., Sidorova Y. (2015). Discovering the miracle of large numbers of antitrust investigations in Russia: The role of competition authority incentives. HSE Research Paper, No. WP BRP 26/PA/2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588989
14. Barsy L. D., Gautier A. (2024). Big tech acquisitions and innovation: An empirical assessment. CESifo Working Paper, No. 11025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4783705
15. Bertanha M., McCallum A. H., Seegert N. (2023). Better bunching, nicer notching. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 237, No. 2, article 105512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105512
16. Calonico S., Cattaneo M. D., Farrell M. H. (2018). On the effect of bias estimation on coverage accuracy in nonparametric inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 113, No. 522, pp. 767—779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1285776
17. Calonico S., Cattaneo M. D., Titiunik R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 2295—2326. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta11757
18. Cattaneo M. D., Titiunik R. (2022). Regression discontinuity designs. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 821—851. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-021409
19. Cattaneo M. D., Jansson M., Ma X. (2018). Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity. Stata Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 234—261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1801800115
20. Chen S., Van der Klaauw W. (2008). The work disincentive effects of the disability insurance program in the 1990s. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 757—784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.016
21. Chetty R., Friedman J. N., Olsen T., Pistaferri L. (2011). Adjustment costs, firm responses, and micro vs. macro labor supply elasticities: Evidence from Danish tax records. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 749—804. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr013
22. Feng J., Hwang T., Liu Y., Maini L. (2023). Mergers that matter: The impact of M&A activity in prescription drug markets. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4523015
23. Gautier A., Lamesch J. (2021). Mergers in the digital economy. Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 54, article 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100890
24. Hausman C., Rapson D. S. (2018). Regression discontinuity in time: Considerations for empirical applications. Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 533—552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-121517-033306
25. Jales H. (2018). Estimating the effects of the minimum wage in a developing country: A density discontinuity design approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 29—51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2586
26. Jin G. Z., Leccese M., Wagman L. (2023). How do top acquirers compare in technology mergers? New evidence from an SP taxonomy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 89, article 102891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2022.102891
27. Kepler J. D., Naiker V., Stewart C. R. (2023). Stealth acquisitions and product market competition. Journal of Finance, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 2837—2900. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13256
28. Lee D. S., Lemieux T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 281—355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
29. McCrary J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 698—714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
30. Morzenti G. (2022). Antitrust policy and innovation. Unpublished manuscript. https://sites.google.com/view/giovanni-morzenti/research
31. Sorvachev I., Yakovlev E. (2019). Short-run and long-run effects of sizable child subsidy: Evidence from Russia. London: LSE, Institute of Global Affairs.
32. Stavniychuk A. Y., Markova O. А. (2023). “Acquire and leave”: Effects of startups acquisitions by digital ecosystems. Upravlenets/The Manager, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 83—105. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-5-6
33. Wollmann T. G. (2019). Stealth consolidation: Evidence from an amendment to the Hart— Scott—Rodino Act. American Economic Review: Insights, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 77—94. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180137
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Markova O.A., Stavniychuk A.Y. Changes in antitrust regulation and merger activity in Russia: Price manipulations and need for additional antitrust scrutiny. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(10):94-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-94-109
Views:
458
Email this article 
