Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Three questions to political economy (An attempt of system introspection)

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-118-127

Abstract

The development of the system paradigm in economic science leads to the formulation of a number of important questions to the political economy as one of the basic directions of economic theory. In this article, on the basis of system introspection, three questions are considered. The first is the relevance of the class approach to the structuring of the socio-economic space; the second is the feasibility of revising the notion of property in the modern world; the third is the validity of the notion of changing formations as the sequence of “slave-owning system — feudal system — capitalist system”. It is shown that in modern society the system approach to the structuring of socio-economic space is more relevant than the class one. Today the classical notion of “property” does not reflect the diversity of production and economic relations in society and should be replaced by the notion of “system property”, which provides a significant expansion of the concepts of “subject of property” and “object of property”. The change of social formations along with the linear component has a more influential cyclic constituent and obeys the system-wide cyclic regularity that reflects the four-cycle sequence of the dominance of one of the subsystems of the macrosystem: project, object, environment and process.

About the Author

G. B. Kleiner
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, RAS Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation; State University of Management
Russian Federation

George B. Kleiner

Moscow



References

1. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2016a). Political economy and economic policy. Market. Capital. Society. Terra Economicus, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 27—47. (In Russian).

2. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2016b). System view on the economy: Positive criticism of the methodology and theory of G. B. Kleiner. Ekonomicheskaya Nauka Sovremennoy Rossii, No. 4, pp. 43—64. (In Russian).

3. Buchanan J. M. (1997). Works. Vol. 1. Nureev R. M. et al. (eds.). M.: Taurus Alfa. (In Russian).

4. Gulyaeva O. A. (2013). Institution of private property and its impact on the economic development of contemporary Russia. National Interests: Priorities and Security, No. 48, pp. 26—30. (In Russian).

5. Kleiner G. (2011). System resource of economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1. pp. 89—100. (In Russian).

6. Kleiner G. (2013a). System economics as a platform for development of modern economic theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 4—28. (In Russian).

7. Kleiner G. (2013b). What kind of economy does Russia need and for what purpose (An attempt of system analysis). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 4—27. (In Russian).

8. Kleiner G. (2015). Sustainability of Russian economy in the mirror of system economic theory (Part 1). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 107—123. (In Russian).

9. Kleiner G. (2016). Sustainability of Russian economy in the mirror of system economic theory (Part 2). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 117—138. (In Russian).

10. Kleiner G. (2017). From the economy of individuals to systemic economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 56—74. (In Russian).

11. Kleiner G. B., Rybachuk M. A. (2017). Systemic balance of the economy. Moscow: Nauchnaya Biblioteka. (In Russian).

12. Kornai J. (2002). System paradigm. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 4—23. (In Russian).

13. Medvedev V. A. (2015). Tested by history. On the economic theory of Marxism. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russian).]

14. Nureev R. M. (2017). Economic comparative studies (Comparative analysis of economic systems) + eAttachment: textbook. M.: KNORUS. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kleiner G.B. Three questions to political economy (An attempt of system introspection). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(8):118-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-118-127

Views: 1155


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)