Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economic analysis of conspicuous waste: historical overview and modern approaches

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-119-134

Abstract

Both conspicuous waste practices and their analysis have undergone significant changes since Veblen first defined them in his “Theory of leisure class” over a century ago. The article provides a comparative interdisciplinary overview of the approaches to the analysis of the economic practices of conspicuous waste. The first part of the article focuses on original approach to conspicuous waste that was proposed by Veblen, who suggested that such waste allows economic agents to maximize a special kind of utility. As this approach assumes that conspicuous waste works as a quasi-language system where the information about social status and wealth of the person is being coded, transferred and decoded, the article suggests naming it “semiotic approach”. The next part of the article considers the development of this approach in the works by Galbraith, Baudrillard, and Douglas and Isherwood. Both advantages and limitations of this approach are being considered, and possible alternative approach, based on the application of behavioral economics, is being suggested. The final part of the article provides an application of the received findings to the analysis of the modern digitalized practices of conspicuous leisure. Thus, the article examines the influence of digitalization on the dynamics between conspicuous consumption and leisure, the ways economic practices of conspicuous waste have changed within the framework of social media, and the impact of this change on the modern labour/leisure balance.

About the Author

T. M. Shishkina
HSE University
Russian Federation

Tatiana M. Shishkina, PhD in Economics

St. Petersburg



References

1. Baudrillard J. (2020a).The system of things. Moscow: Ripol-classic. (In Russian).

2. Baudrillard J. (2020b).The consumer society. Moscow: ACT. (In Russian).

3. Bourdieu P. (1993). Social space and symbolic power. THESIS, No. 2, pp. 137—150. (In Russian).

4. Bourdieu P. (2019).Economic anthropology. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).

5. Veblen T. (2011). The theory of leisure class. Moscow: Librocom. (In Russian).

6. ГGalbraith J. K. (2018). The affluent society. Moscow: Olymp-Business. (In Russian).

7. Kahneman D. (2017). Thinking, fast and slow. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

8. Katona D. (2001). Rational behaviour and economic behaviour. In: B. M. Enis (ed.). Classics of marketing. St. Petersburg: Piter, pp. 161—174. (In Russian).

9. Newport K. (2019). The digital minimalism. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber. (In Russian).

10. Rassel B. (2020) History of Western philosophy. Moscow: ACT. (In Russian).

11. Simon H. (1993). Rationality as process and as product of thought. THESIS, No. 3, pp. 16—38. (In Russian).

12. Smith A. (2022). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Moscow: ACT. (In Russian).

13. Thaler R., Sunstein C. (2017). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, and Ferber (In Russian).

14. Shishkina T. (2017). Conspicuous waste and representativeness heuristic. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 68—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.4.068-079

15. Douglas M., Isherwood B. (1996). The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Psychology Press.

16. Faucher K. (2018). Social capital online. London: University of Westminster Press.

17. Kando T. (1975). Leisure and popular culture in transition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

18. Kelly J. R. (1975). Life styles and leisure choices. Family Coordinator, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 185—190. https://doi.org/10.2307/582283

19. Miller H. (2018). Veblen online: Information and the risk of commandeering the conspicuous self. Information Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, article 797.

20. Rosenzweig R. (1985). Eight hours for what we will: Workers and leisure in an industrial city, 1870—1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21. Sabatini F., Sarracino F. (2016). Keeping up with the e-Joneses: Do online social networks raise social comparisons? ETA: Economic Theory and Applications, No. 234936, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

22. Stebbins R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 251—272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388726

23. Ulph D. (2014). Keeping up with the Joneses: Who loses out? Economics Letters, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 400—403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.10.029


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Shishkina T.M. Economic analysis of conspicuous waste: historical overview and modern approaches. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(4):119-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-119-134

Views: 640


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)