Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Fiscal rules as an instrument of balanced budget policy

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-11-5-32

Abstract

In the article the authors attempt to understand the extent to which fiscal rules that were applied earlier in Russia and are in force at the present time are systemic and balanced, which requirements must be met by an effective fiscal rule in current conditions. So, according to the authors, fiscal rules should allow to adapt the budget to the requirements of financing structural changes in the economy and to maintain control over long-term budgetary sustainability. However, the new fiscal rules, introduced in July 2017, imposing excessively tight restrictions on the volume of federal budget expenditures, will not allow to provide the necessary amount of expenditures for economic development and financing of structural reforms. In this regard, a consistent transformation of the current version of fiscal rules to the framework on the basis of a zero structural balance is justified. The preparation of federal budget, balanced on a cyclical basis, can provide a relatively stable level of expenditure, regardless of the volatility of oil prices and the economic cycle, thereby realizing the countercyclical nature of fiscal policy and reducing the budget vulnerability to internal and external shocks. The effectiveness of the proposed fiscal rule is verified through modeling on data for 2007-2016. In particular, if we had used the proposed rule starting from the second half of the 2000s, it would have been possible to curb the growth of federal budget expenditures that began with the anti-crisis measures of 2009, halve the level of public debt and accumulate sovereign reserves in the amount of up to 25% of GDP. At the same time, the proposed rule requires high quality of macroeconomic and budgetary forecasting.

About the Authors

A. Kudrin
St. Petersburg State University; Fund “Center for Strategic Research”
Russian Federation


I. Sokolov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation


References

1. Vlasov S., Deryugina E., Vlasova Yu. (2013). The analysis of Russia’s fiscal sustainability in the short- and long run. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 33—49. (In Russian).

2. Gurvich E., Sokolov I. (2016). Fiscal rules: Excessive limitation or indispensable instrument of fiscal sustainability? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 5—29. (In Russian).

3. Drobyshevsky S., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. (2012). Macroeconomic preconditions of realization of a new growth model. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 4—24. (In Russian).

4. Kudrin A. (2006). The mechanisms of forming of Russia’s non-oil-and-gas budget balance. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 4—16. (In Russian).

5. Kudrin A. (2011). The budget of modernization of Russia’s economy. Finansy, No. 1, pp. 3—10. (In Russian).

6. Kudrin A., Sergienko O. (2011). Consequences of the crisis and prospects of Russia’s social and economic development. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 4—19. (In Russian).

7. Kudrin A., Sokolov I. (2017). Fiscal maneuver and restructuring the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 5—27. (In Russian).

8. Mamedli M. (2015). The hypothesis of permanent income, myopia of consumption, and liquidity constraints in Russia. Russian Journal of Economic Theory, No. 4, pp. 49—57. (In Russian).

9. Shagas N., Perevyshin Yu. (2013). Econometric study of factors of economic growth (Simulation of the impact of public expenditures on GDP dynamics). Unpublished manuscript, RANEPA. (In Russian).

10. Alesina A., Passalacqua A. (2015). The political economy of government debt. NBER Working Paper, No. 21821.

11. Aschauer D. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 177-200.

12. Barro R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp. 103-126.

13. Cordes T., Kinda T., Muthoora P., Weber An. (2015). Expenditure rules: Effective tools for sound fiscal policy? IMF Working Paper, No. WP/15/29.

14. Geier A. (2011). The debt brake - The Swiss fiscal rule at the federal level. Working Paper of the FFA, No. 15.

15. Enders R., Walter D. (2015). Trends and univariate decompositions. In: Applied econometric time series (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, pp. 247-270.

16. Hodrick R., Prescott Ed. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-16.

17. IMF (2009). Fiscal rules: Anchoring expectations for sustainable public finances. Washington, DC.

18. Ravn M., Uhlig H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 371-380.

19. Schick A. (2003). The role of fiscal rules in budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 7-34.

20. Valdes R.O., Engel Ed. M. (2000). Optimal fiscal strategy for oil exporting countries. IMF Working Papers, No. 00/118.

21. Федеральный закон от 23.12.2003 г. № 184-ФЗ «О внесении дополнений в Бюджетный кодекс Российской Федерации в части создания Стабилизационного фонда Российской Федерации»


Review

For citations:


Kudrin A., Sokolov I. Fiscal rules as an instrument of balanced budget policy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(11):5-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-11-5-32

Views: 2090


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)