Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Дэниел Канеман и Вернон Смит: экономический анализ человеческого поведения (Нобелевская премия за чувство реальности)

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-1-4-23

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В статье рассматриваются научные достижения нобелевских лауреатов 2002 г. Д. Канемана и В. Смита. Подчеркивается, что впервые премию по экономике получил не экономист, а представитель другой научной дисциплины - психолог. Главным вкладом Канемана в экономическую теорию является построение модели поведения человека, отличной от классической модели homo оeconomicus и более точно отражающей особенности принятия решений. В. Смит - отец экспериментальной экономики. При помощи лабораторных экспериментов он подтвердил ряд теоретических гипотез. Присуждение нобелевской премии этим ученым следует считать шагом вперед по укреплению междисциплинарного сотрудничества в области общественных наук.

Об авторе

А. Белянин
ИМЭМО РАН
Россия
доктор экономики, научный сотрудник 


Список литературы

1. Алле М. Поведение рационального человека в условиях риска: критика постулатов и аксиом американской школы // THESIS, 1994, т. 5, с. 217-241.

2. Фишберн П. Теория полезности для принятия решений. М.: Наука, 1974.

3. фон Нейман Дж., Моргенштерн О. Теория игр и экономическое поведение. М.: Наука, 1970.

4. Фридмен М. Методология позитивной экономической науки // THESIS, 1994, т. 4, с. 20-52.

5. Allais M. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulates et des axioms de l’ecole americaine // Econometrica, 1953, vol. 21, No.4, p. 503-546.

6. Bronfman C., McCabe K., Porter D., Rassenti S., Smith V. An Experimental Examination of the Walrasian Tatonnement Mechanism // Rand Journal of Economics, 1996, vol. 27, p. 681-699.

7. Chamberlin E. An Experimental Imperfect Market // Journal of Political Economy, 1948, vol. 56, p. 95-108.

8. Coursey D., Smith V. Experimental Tests of an Allocation Method for Public, Private or Externality Goods // Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1984, vol. 86, p. 464-484.

9. Cox J., Robertson B., Smith V. Theory and behavior of single object auctions. In: V. Smith (ed.). Research in experimental economics. Vol. 3. JAI Press, 1985.

10. Cox J., Smith V., Walker J. Theory and Individual Behavior in First-price Auctions // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988, vol. 1, p. 61-99.

11. Fishburn P. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley, 1970.

12. Franciosi R., Kujal P. , Michelitsch R., Deng G., Smith V. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1996, vol. 30, p. 213-227.

13. Friedman M. Methodology of positive economics. In: Friedman M. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.

14. Gigerenzer G. How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: beyond ‘Heuristics and Biases’ // European Review of Social Psychology, 1991, vol. 2, p. 83-115.

15. Gigerenzer G. On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: a Reply to Kahneman and Tversky // Psychological Review, 1996, vol. 103, no.3, p. 592-596.

16. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat K., Smith V. Preferences, Property Rights and Anonymity in Bargaining Games // Games and Economic Behaviour, 1994, vol. 7, p. 346-380.

17. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Smith V. Ultimatum and Dictator Games // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, vol. 9, p. 236-239.

18. Hong J., Plott C. Rate Filing Policies for Inland Water Transportation: an Experimental Approach // Bell Journal of Economics, 1982, vol. 12, p. 1-19.

19. Isaac R., Smith V. In search for predatory pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, vol. 93, p. 320-345.

20. Kagel J., Harstad R., Levin D. Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: a Laboratory Study // Econometrica, 1987, vol. 55, p. 1275-1304.

21. Kagel J., Roth A. (eds.). Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

22. Kahneman D. and Tversky A. Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica, 1979, vol. 47, p. 263-291.

23. Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. Experimental Tests of the Endowment effect and the Coase Theorem // Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, No.6, p. 1325-1350.

24. Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler, R. The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, p. 193-206.

25. Kahneman D., Ritov I. Determinants of Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: a Study in the Headline Method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1994, vol. 9, p. 5-38.

26. Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions: A Reply to Gigerenzer's Critique // Psychological Review, 1996, vol. 103, p. 582-59.

27. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness // Cognitive psychology, 1972, vol. 3, p. 430-454.

28. Kahneman D., Wakker, P. , Sarin, R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, p. 375-405.

29. Ketcham J., Smith V., Williams A. A Сomparison of Posted-offer and Double Auction Pricing Institutions // Review of Economic Studies, 1984, vol. 51, p. 595-614.

30. Knetsch J., Sinden J. The Persistence of Evaluation Disparities // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987, vol. 102 p. 691-695.

31. Knetsch J., Sinden J. Willingness-To-Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, vol. 99, p. 507-521.

32. Knez M., Smith V. Hypothetical Valuations and Preference Reversals in the Context of Asset Trading. In: A.Roth (ed.). Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

33. Krantz D., Luce R., Suppes P. , Tversky A. Foundations of measurement. Vol. 1: New York: Academic Press, 1971; Vol. 2: San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1989; Vol. 3: San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1993.

34. Laibson D., Zeckhauser R. Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1998, vol. 16, no.1, p. 7-47.

35. McCabe K. and Smith V. (2001) Goodwill accounting in economic exchange. In: G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten (eds.). Bounded Rationality: the Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.

36. Porter D., Smith V. Stock Market Bubbles in the Laboratory. -Applied Mathematical Finance, 1994, vol. 1, p. 111-127.

37. Prelec D. The Probability Weighting Function. Econometrica, 1998, vol. 66, p. 497-527.

38. Rabin M. Psychology and Economics // Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, vol. 35, p. 11-46.

39. Rassenti S., Smith V., Wilson B. Using Experiments to Inform the Privatization/Deregulation Movement in Electricity // Cato Journal, 2002, vol. 21, No.3.

40. Roth A. Introduction to Experimental Economics. In: J. Kagel, A. Roth (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, p. 3-109.

41. Samuelson P. , Nordhaus W. Economics. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.

42. Simon H. A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, vol. 69, p. 99-118.

43. Simon H. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment // Psychological Review, 1956, vol. 63, p. 129-138.

44. Smith V. (ed.). Research in experimental economics. JAI Press. vol.1: 1979; vol.2: 1982; vol.3: 1985.

45. Smith V. An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior // Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, p. 111-137.

46. Smith V. Bidding and auctioning institutions: experimental results. In: Y. Amihud (ed.). Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation. New York: New York University Press, 1976, p. 43-64.

47. Smith V. Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decision // American Economic Review, 1980, vol. 70, p. 584-599.

48. Smith V. Incentive Compatible Experimental Processes for the Provision of Public Goods. In: V. Smith (ed.). Research in Experimental Economics. JAI Press, 1979, vol. 1, p. 59-168.

49. Smith V. Microeconomic Theory as Experimental Science // American Economic Review, 1982, vol. 72, p. 923-955.

50. Smith V. Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991; Smith V. Economic Principles in the Emergence of Humankind // Economic Inquiry, 1992, vol. 30, p. 1-13.

51. Smith V. Rational Choice - the Contrast between Economics and Psychology // Journal of Political Economy, 1991, vol. 99, p. 877-897.

52. Smith V. Theory, Experiment and Antitrust Policy. In: S. Salop (ed.). Strategy, Predation and Antitrust Analysis. Washington: Federal Trade Commission, 1981.

53. Smith V., Suchanek G., Willliams A. Bubbles, Crashes and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets. Econometrica, 1988, vol. 5б, p. 1119-1152.

54. Smith V., Williams A. The Boundaries of Competitive Price Theory: Expectations, Convergence and Transaction Tosts. In: L.Green and J.Kagel (eds.). Advances in Behavioural Economics. Norwood (NJ): Ablex Publishing, 1989.

55. Smith V., Williams A., Bratton W., Vannoni M. Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs. Sealed-bid Offer Auctions // American Economic Review, 1982, vol. 72, p. 58-77.

56. Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk // Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, vol. 38, p. 332-382.

57. Tversky A. and Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, vol. 5, No. 4, p. 297-323.

58. Tversky A. and Kahneman D. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases // Science, 1974, vol. 185, p. 1126.

59. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review, 1972, vol. 79, p. 281-299

60. Tversky A. Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84, p. 327-352.

61. Tversky A. Intransitivity of Preferences // Psychological Review, 1969, vol. 76, p. 31-48.

62. Tversky A. Sattach S., Slovic P. Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice. Psychological Review, 1988, vol. 95, no.3, p. 371-384.

63. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, vol. 5, no.4, p. 297-323.

64. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: a Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability // Cognitive psychology, 1973, vol. 5, p. 207-232.

65. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment of and by representativeness. In: D.Kahneman, P. Slovic, A.Tversky (eds.). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heursitics and Biases. New York: Cambridge university press, 1982.

66. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. In: R. Hogarth and M. Reder, (eds.). Rational Choice: the Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.

67. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice // Science, 1981, vol. 211, p. 453-458.

68. Tversky A., Slovic P. , Kahneman D. The Causes of Preference Reversal // American Economic Review, 1990, vol. 80, No.1, p. 204-217.

69. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders // Journal of Finance, 1961, vol. 16, p. 8-37.

70. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.

71. Wakker P. , Tversky A. An Axiomatization of Cumulative Prospect Theory // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 147-176.


Для цитирования:


Белянин А. Дэниел Канеман и Вернон Смит: экономический анализ человеческого поведения (Нобелевская премия за чувство реальности). Вопросы экономики. 2003;(1):4-23. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-1-4-23

For citation:


Belyanin A. Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith: Nobel Prize for the Feeling of Reality (Economic Analysis of Human Behavior). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2003;(1):4-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-1-4-23

Просмотров: 305


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)