

Forestry: The Mechanisms of the Accordance of the Rights of User Analysis
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-9-57-70
Abstract
The author considers the ways in which the rights of user of the forestry in Russia are granted. The article analyzes the international experience of forest auctions and describes the main problems of the auction design.
References
1. Elyakimea B., Loisel P. An optimal standing timber auction? // Journal of Forest Economics. 2005. No 11. P. 107-120.
2. Gillis М. Forest concession management and revenue // N. Sharma (ed.) Managing the World's Forests: Looking for Balance Between Conservation and Development. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt Publishing, 1992. P. 139-175.
3. Gray J. A., Hägerby L. Forest concessions in Nicaragua: Policies and pricing. Managua, Nicarаgua: Adforest/Marena, 1997.
4. Grut M., Gray J. A., Egli N. Forest pricing and concession policies: Managing the high forests of West and Central Africa: Technical Paper Nо 143 // World Bank. Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, DC, 1991.
5. Klemperer P. D. What Really Matters in Auction Design. Mimeo, 2001.
6. Landell-Mills N., Ford J. Privatising Sustainable Forestry: A Global Review of Trends and Challenges. London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 1999.
7. Responses of Timber Concessionaires to Selected Policy Instruments:The Case Of Peninsular Malaysia. Research report No 2003-RR1. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-33035-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.
8. Ryburn W. E. Timber valuation: A simplified approach for appraising standing timber in Honduras. World Forestry Congress, Turkey, Antalya, 1997, 13-22 October.
9. Toivonen R. Roundwood Price Reporting, Comparison of a Few European Countries. Working Paper, Pellervo Economic Research Institute, 1997.
Review
For citations:
Manakov A. Forestry: The Mechanisms of the Accordance of the Rights of User Analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2006;(9):57-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-9-57-70