|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Stabilization Fund Generation and Use
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-4-31-52
Abstract
Comprehensive analysis of stabilization fund design and management as a macroeconomic tool is suggested. Restrictions on the use of windfall revenues, stemming from fiscal and monetary sustainability conditions are presented. It is stressed that additional spending of windfall revenues inevitably results in real appreciation of the ruble. According to medium-term macroeconomic projections, if current high export prices sustain, the use of windfall revenues may be gradually raised, but still spending money from the Stabilization Fund of RF will remain quite limited through the year 2008.
References
1. Банк России. Основные направления единой государственной денежно-кредитной политики на 2006 год. М., 2005.
2. Гурвич Е. Бюджетная и монетарная политика в условиях нестабильной внешней конъюнктуры // Вопросы экономики. 2006. № 3. С. 4-27.
3. Дынникова О. Реальный обменный курс и ВВП // Модернизация экономики России: Итоги и перспективы. М.: ГУ–ВШЭ, 2003.
4. Кудрин А. Стабилизационный фонд: зарубежный и российский опыт // Вопросы экономики. 2006. № 2. С. 28-45.
5. Davis J., Ossowski R., Daniel J. et al. Stabilization and Savings Funds for Nonrenewable Resources: Experience and Fiscal Policy Implications // Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil-Producing Countries. IMF, 2003.
6. Fasano U. Review of the Experience with Oil Stabilization and Savings Funds in Selected Countries: IMF Working Paper, WP/00/112, 2000.
7. Krugman P., Taylor L. Contractionary Effects of Devaluation // Journal of International Economics. 1978. No 8.
Review
For citations:
Gurvich E. Stabilization Fund Generation and Use. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2006;(4):31-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-4-31-52
Views:
497
Email this article 
