

Electricity Restructuring: To Real Competition or Potemkin-type Liberalisation?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-11-39-56
Abstract
Electricity restructuring is intended to introduce competition into electricity production and supply, leaving dispatch, transmission and distribution as regulated natural monopolies with non-discriminatory third-party access to the networks. The aim of the reform is to ensure that supply continues to meet growing demand by creating conditions that will encourage investment and promote greater efficiency in both production and consumption. If the reform is to achieve its major goals, the marketised segments of the sector must be characterised by real competition based on economically meaningful prices. There are two dangers here. The first is that private interests will acquire substantial market power. The second is that the state itself will use the assets it retains, combined with the considerable regulatory powers at its disposal, to "manage" the market.
References
1. Arthur Andersen. Russian Electricity Reform: Recommendations Report. Moscow, April 2001.
2. IEA. Competition in Electricity Markets. Paris, International Energy Agency, 2001.
3. IEA. Regulatory Reform Review of Russia: Background on the Electricity Sector. Paris, International Energy Agency, September 2003.
4. IEA. World Energy Investment Outlook 2003. Paris, International Energy Agency, 2003.
5. Nash R., Jacob H., Moiseev A. The Economics of Tariff Reform. Moscow, Renaissance Capital, July 2002.
6. OECD Economic Surveys: The Russian Federation. Paris, 2000.
7. OECD Economic Surveys: The Russian Federation. Paris, 2002.
8. Pittman R. Vertical Restructuring of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition Economies. Background paper for the World Development Report 2002: Institutions for Development.
9. Pryadilnikov M. Calculating Implicit Subsidies in Russia, 1998-2002. Washington, DC, The World Bank, April 2003.
10. Renaissance Capital. Acceleration and Simplification of RAO UES Restructuring. Mimeo. Moscow, December 2003.
11. Sillantaka L. UES: Undervalued despite Overcapacity. Moscow, Troika Dialog, November 2002.
Review
For citations:
Tompson W. Electricity Restructuring: To Real Competition or Potemkin-type Liberalisation? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2005;(11):39-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-11-39-56