

Clusters and Innovations in the Subjects of RF: The Results of Empirical Study
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-9-93-107
Abstract
According to the modern economic theory one of the most important factors of increasing the rate of innovations is cluster formation. Studies undertaken in the US and Europe confirm the significance of this factor. Nevertheless, it is unclear, to which extent the regularities observed in developed countries can be applied to transition and developing economies. This paper is dedicated to theoretical justification and empirical study of the impact of clusters on the innovation rate in the regions of the Russian Federation.
About the Authors
E. KutsenkoRussian Federation
D. Tyumentseva
Russian Federation
References
1. Куценко Е. С. Кластеры в экономике: практика выявления. Обобщение зарубежного опыта // Обозреватель. 2009. № 10.
2. Куценко Е. С. Понятие кластера и его ключевые признаки: вводная информация // Сборник материалов к межрегиональной конференции «Предпринимательство в промышленности: пути развития / Мероприятия государственной поддержки совместных (кластерных) проектов МСП», Москва, Экспоцентр, 2010, 2 дек. http://www.promcluster.ru/images/UPLOAD/sbornik_2010.pdf.
3. Куценко Е. С. Проект «Выявление основных направлений для развития кластеров в субъектах РФ: методологическая справка». 2010 г. http://www.promcluster.ru/images/UPLOAD/metodologia_issledovania.pdf.
4. Портер М. Э. Конкуренция. М.: Вильямс, 2005.
5. Cheshire P. C., Malecki E. J. Growth, Development, and Innovation: A Look Back and Forward // Papers in Regional Science. 2004. Vol. 83. P. 249-267.
6. Crescenzi R., Rodriguez-Pose A., Storper M. The Territorial Dynamicsof Innovation: A Europe-United States Comparative Analysis // Journal of Economic Geography. 2007. Vol. 7. P. 673-709.
7. Desrochers P. Geographical Proximity and the Transmission of Tacit Knowledge // Review of Austrian Economics. 2001. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 25-46. http://www.gmu.edu/depts/rae/archives/VOL14_1_2001/2_desrochers.pdf
8. Hollanders H., Arundel A. Global Innovation Scoreboard 2006 / MERIT (Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology), 2006. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/doc/eis_2006_global_innovation_report.pdf
9. Jaffe A. B. Real Effects of Academic Research // The American Economic Review. 1989. Vol. 79, No 5. P. 957-970.
10. Kuchiki A. The Flowchart Model of Cluster Policy: The Automobile Industry Cluster in China. 2007. http://ir.ide.go.jp/dspace/bitstream/2344/550/1/ARRIDE_Discussion_No.100_kuchiki.pdf
11. Lampe R., Moser P. Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? / Evidence from the 19th Century Sewing Machine Industry. 13th Annual Conference of The International Society for New InstitutionalEconomics, 2009. http://extranet.isnie.org/uploads/isnie2009/moser_lampe.pdf
12. Lecocq C., Leten B., Kusters J., Van Looy B. Do Firms Benefit from Being Presentin Technology Clusters? Evidence from a Panel of Biopharmaceutical Firms. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1536970.
13. Lindqvist G. Disentangling Clusters: Agglomeration and Proximity Effects / Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Ph. D. Stockholm School of Economics, 2009.
14. Polanyi K. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
15. Porter M. The Economic Performance of Regions // Regional Studies. 2003. Vol. 37, No 6-7. P. 549-578.
16. Wold H. Soft Modeling: Intermediate between Traditional Model Building and Data Analysis // Mathematical Statistics. 1980. Vol. 6. P. 333-346.
Review
For citations:
Kutsenko E., Tyumentseva D. Clusters and Innovations in the Subjects of RF: The Results of Empirical Study. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2011;(9):93-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-9-93-107