Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
За пределами ВВП: в поисках меры общественного благосостояния. Часть II
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-3-32-51
Аннотация
Во второй части статьи автор рассматривает немонетарные индикаторы общественного благосостояния. Описаны различные методы изучения субъективного благополучия и счастья. Автор показывает, с какими проблемами сталкивается исследователь, желая изучить благосостояние на микроуровне и учесть когнитивные и аффективные аспекты оценки индивидами своего благосостояния, а также значение социальных связей. Кроме того, автор показывает, насколько альтернативные методики, в частности анализ возможностей и функций, предложенный А. Сеном, совместимы с современной экономической теорией благосостояния, и каковы перспективы этой теории.
Об авторе
М. Флербе
Национальный центр научных исследований; Университет Париж Декарт
Франция
Франция
научный сотрудник
Список литературы
1. Alkire S. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford and N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2002.
2. Anand P., Hunter G., Smith R. Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen-Nussbaum Approach to Welfare // Social Indicators Research. 2005. Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 9-55.
3. Anderson E. S. What is the Point of Equality? //Ethics. 1999. Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 287-337.
4. Arneson R. J. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare // Philosophical Studies. 1989. Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 77-93.
5. Arneson R. J. Real Freedom and Distributive Justice // Freedom in Economics: New Perspectives in Normative Analysis / J.-F. Laslier, M. Fleurbaey, N. Gravel, A. Trannoy (eds.). L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 1998, pp. 165-196.
6. Barry B. Rationality and Want-Satisfaction // Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls / M. Fleurbaey, M. Salles, J. A. Weymark (eds.). Cambridge; N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 281-299.
7. Basu K., Lopez-CalvaL.-F. Functionings and Capabilities // Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 2 / K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, K. Suzumura (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier; San Diego: North-Holland, 2011. Р. 153-187.
8. Becker G. S., Rayo L. Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox: Comment, pp. 88-95.
9. BrickmanPh., Campbell D. T. Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society // Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium / M. H. Appley (ed.). N. Y.: AcademicPress, 1971, pp. 287-304.
10. Brun B. Ch., Tungodden B. Non-welfaristic Theories of Justice: Is The Intersection Approach a Solution to the Indexing Impasse? // Social Choice and Welfare. 2004. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 49-60.
11. Burchardt T. Happiness and Social Policy: Barking Up the Right Tree in the Wrong Neck of the Woods // Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy / L. Bauld, K. Clarke, T. Maltby (eds.). Bristol: Policy Press, 2006, pp. 145-164.
12. Burchardt T. Happiness and Social Policy; Schokkaert E. Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life // Journal of Human Development. 2007. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 415-430.
13. Chakraborty A. On the Possibility of a Weighting System for Functionings // Indian Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 241-250.
14. Clark A. E., Frijters P., Shields M. A. Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles // Journal of Economic Literature. 2008. Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 95-144.
15. Clark A. E., Frijters P., Shields M. A. Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility.
16. Clark A. E., Oswald A. J. A Simple Statistical Method for Measuring How Life Events Affect Happiness // International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002.Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 1139-1144.
17. Cohen G. A. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice // Ethics. 1989. Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 906-944.
18. Deaton A. Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2008. Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 53-72.
19. Diener E. Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities // Social Indicators Research. 1994. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 103-157.
20. Diener E. Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index // American Psychologist. 2000. Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 34-43.
21. Diener E., Suh E. M., Lucas R. E., Smith H. L. Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress // Psychological Bulletin. 1999. Vol. 125, No. 2, pp. 276-302.
22. Dowrick S., Dunlop Y., Quiggin J. Social Indicators and Comparisons of Living Standards // Journal of Development Economics. 2003. Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 501-529.
23. Dutta I., Pattanaik P. K., Xu Y. On Measuring Deprivation and the Standard of Living in a Multidimensional Framework on the Basis of Aggregate Data // Economica. 2003. Vol. 70, No. 278, pp. 197-221.
24. Easterlin R. A. Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence // Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz / P. A. David, M. W. Reder (eds.). N. Y.: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 89-125.
25. Easterlin R. A. Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1995. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 35-47.
26. Ekman P. An Argument for Basic Emotions // Cognition and Emotion. 1992. Vol. 6, No. 3-4, pp. 169—200.
27. Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications // Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications. Eighth World Congress. Vol. 1 / M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen, S. J. Turnovsky (eds.). Cambridge; N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 208-257.
28. Ferrer i Carbonell A., Frijters P. How Important Is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness? // Economic Journal. 2004. Vol. 114, No. 497, pp. 641-659.
29. Fleurbaey M. Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare // Journal of Economic Literature. 2009. Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1055-1075.
30. Fleurbaey M. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008.
31. Fleurbaey M. Social Choice and the Indexing Dilemma // Social Choice and Welfare. 2007. Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 633-648.
32. Frederick S., Loewenstein G. Hedonic Adaptation // Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, pp. 302-329.
33. Frey B. S., Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.
34. Frey B. S., Stutzer A. Should National Happiness Be Maximized? // Working Paper No. 306 / University of Zurich Institute for Empirical Research in Economics. 2007.
35. Frijda N. H. Emotions and Hedonic Experience // Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology / D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (eds.). N. Y.: Sage, 1999, pp. 190-212.
36. Gadrey J., Jany-Catrice F. The New Indicators of Well-Being and Development. Houndmills, UK; N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
37. Hausman D. M. Hedonist Welfare Economics and the Value of Health. 2007. Unpublished.
38. Kahneman D. Objective Happiness // Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, pp. 3-25.
39. Kahneman D., Krueger A. B. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 3-24.
40. Kahneman D., Krueger A. B., Schkade D. A., Schwarz N., Stone A. A. Toward National Well-Being Accounts // American Economic Review. 2004. Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 429-434.
41. Kahneman D., Wakker P. P., Sarin R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997. Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 375-405.
42. Krueger A. B. Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox: Comment // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2008. Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 95-100.
43. Krueger A. B., Schkade D. A. The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures // Journal of Public Economics. 2008. Vol. 92, No. 8-9, pp. 1833-1845.
44. Krueger A. B., Stone A. A. Assessment of Pain: A Community-Based Diary Survey in the USA // Lancet. 2008. Vol. 371, No. 9623, pp. 1519-1525.
45. Kuklys W. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Berlin; N. Y.: Springer, 2005.
46. Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. L.: Allen Lane, 2005.
47. Loewenstein G., Ubel P. A. Hedonic Adaptation and the Role of Decision and Experience Utility in Public Policy // Journal of Public Economics. 2008. Vol. 92, No. 8-9, pp. 1795-1810.
48. Miringoff M., Miringoff M..L. The Social Health of the Nation: How America Is Really Doing. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999.
49. Nussbaum M. C. Who Is the Happy Warrior? Philosophy Poses Questions to Psychology // Journal of Legal Studies. 2008. Vol. 37. No. S2, pp. 81-114.
50. Nussbaum M. C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, NY; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
51. Osberg L., Sharpe A. An Index of Economic Well-Being for Selected OECD Countries // Review of Income and Wealth. 2002. Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 291-316
52. Praag B. van, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2007.
53. Ravallion M. Good and Bad Growth: The Human Development Reports // World Development. 1997. Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 631-638.
54. Robeyns I. The Capability Approach in Practice // Journal of Political Philosophy. 2006. Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 351-376.
55. Robeyns I., Veen R. J. van der. Sustainable Quality of Life: Conceptual Analysis for a Policy-Relevant Empirical Specification. Netherlands EnvironmentalAssessment Agency Report 550031006, 2007.
56. Roemer J. E. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA; L.: Harvard University Press, 1998.
57. Russell J. A. A Circumplex Model of Affect // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1161-1178.
58. Schokkaert E. The Capabilities Approach // Discussion Paper No. 07.34 / Catholic University Leuven Center for Economic Studies. 2007.
59. Sen A. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland, 1985.
60. Sen A. Inequality Reexamined. N. Y.: Sage; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
61. Sobel J. Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity// Journal of Economic Literature. 2005. Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 392-436).
62. Sprumont Y. Resource Egalitarianism with a Dash of Efficiency / Universitе de Montreal Dеpartement des ciences еconomique. 2007.
63. Stevenson B., Wolfers J. Economic Growth and SubjectiveWell- Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2008. Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 1-87.
64. Sugden R. The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences // American Economic Review. 2004. Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 1014-1033.
65. Sugden R. The Value of Opportunities over Time When Preferences Are Unstable // Social Choice and Welfare. 2007. Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 665-682.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Флербе М. За пределами ВВП: в поисках меры общественного благосостояния. Часть II. Вопросы экономики. 2012;(3):32-51. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-3-32-51
For citation:
Fleurbaey M. Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part II. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2012;(3):32-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-3-32-51
Просмотров: 712
Послать статью по эл. почте 