

Что исследование переходных экономикдало мейнстриму экономической теории?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-8-98-121
Аннотация
В статье на примерах показано, что опыт посткоммунистической трансформации и спровоцированные eю академические и прикладные дискуссии оказались полезны для экономической теории мейнстрима. Были, в частности, пересмотрены взгляды на роль государства и социальной политики, институтов и банковской системы в экономическом развитии, по-новому стали рассматриваться эффективность приватизации, зависимость от предшествующего развития и функции политических элит в проведении институциональных реформ. Показано, какие из рекомендаций международных консультантов оказались неадекватны в процессе трансформации и почему.
Об авторе
М. ЭллманРоссия
профессор Школы бизнеса Амстердамского университета (Нидерланды)
Список литературы
1. Кузьминов Я., Радаев В., Яковлев А., Ясин Е. (2005). Институты: От заимствования к выращиванию: Опыт российских реформ и возможное культивирование инсти- туциональных изменений. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ.
2. Леонтьев М. (1994). Государство и рынок // Новый мир. № 12. [
3. Никулин А. (2002) Кубанский колхоз между холдингом и асьендой: парадоксы постсоветской модернизации южнорусского сельского сообщества // Рефлексивное крестьяноведение
4. / Под ред. Т. Шанина, А. Никулина, В. Данилова. М.: МВШСЭН.
5. Олейник А. (2011). Власть и рынок: система социально-экономического господства в России «нулевых» годов. М.: РОССПЭН.
6. Ольховский А., Тихонов С. (2010). Здравоохранение в России: двадцать лет реформ, которых не было. СПб.: Нестор-История.
7. Путин В. (2012). О наших экономических задачах // Ведомости. 30 янв.
8. Фомин Д. (2011). Итоги реформирования и перспективы пенсионной системы Рос- сии: вместо послесловия // ЭКО. № 3. С. 86-91.
9. Фомин Д. (2012). Старость, экономика, демография.
10. Ширяева Е. (2012). Реформирование системы досрочных пенсий // ЭКО. № 2. С. 84-88.
11. Ясин Е. (2009). Российская приватизация: еще один взгляд // Права собственности, приватизация и национализация в России / Под общ. ред. В. Л. Тамбовцева. М.: Фонд «Либеральная миссия»; Новое литературное обозрение.
12. Abel I., Bonin J. P. (1993). State Desertion and Convertibility: The Case of Hungary//
13. I. P. Szekely, D. M. Newbery (eds.). Hungary: An Economy in Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Aidis R., Welter F. (eds.). (2008). The Cutting Edge: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in New Europe. Cheltenham: Elgar.
15. Backhouse R. (2010). The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Balcerowicz L., Blaszczyk B., Dabrowski M. (1997). The Polish Way to the Market Economy, 1989-1995 // W. Woo, S. Parker, J. Sachs (eds.). Economies in Transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Besley T., Persson T. (2009). The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation and Politics // American Economic Review. Vol. 99, No 4. Р. 1218-1244.
18. Bezemer D. (2001). Structural Change in the Post-Socialist Transformation of Central European Agriculture. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
19. Bonin J., Schnabel I. (2011) The Great Transformation: From Government-Owned to Foreign-Controlled Banking Sectors // Economics of Transition. Vol. 19, No 3. Р. 397-405.
20. Brainard L. (1991). Strategies for Economic Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Role of Financial Market Reform // B. Blommestein, M. Marrese (eds.). Transformation of Planned Economies: Property Rights Reform and Macroeconomic Stability. Paris: OECD.
21. Brancato E. (2009). Markets versus Hierarchies: A Political Economy of Russia from the 10th Century to 2008. Cheltenham: Elgar. Brown, D., Earle J., Telegdy A. (2006). The Productivity Effects of Privatization: Longitudinal Estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia and Ukraine // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 114, No 1. Р. 61-99.
22. Brunetti A., Kisunko G., Weder B. (1997). Institutions in Transition: Reliability of Rules and Economic Performance in Former Socialist Countries // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No 1809.
23. Caballero R. J. (2010). Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 24, No 4. Р. 85-102.
24. Chang H. J. (2011). Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History// Journal of Institutional Economics. Vol. 7, No 4. Р. 473-498.
25. Crouch C. (1986). Sharing Public Space: States and Organized Interests in Western Europe, in J. A. Hall (ed.). States in History. Oxford: Blackwell.
26. David P. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY // American Economic Review. Vol. 75, No 2. Р. 332-337.
27. Davis C. (2001). Russia's Compulsory Medical Insurance Reform. Department of Economics, Oxford University (unpublished report).
28. Easterly W. (2009). The Indomitable in Pursuit of the Inexplicable: The World Development Reports' Failure to Comprehend Economic Growth Despite Determined Attempts, 1978-2008 // Yusuf (2009).
29. Eatwell J., Ellman M., Karlsson M., Nuti D. M., Shapiro J. (1995). Transformation and Integration: Shaping the Future of Central and Eastern Europe. L.: IPPR.
30. Ellman M. (1997). The Political Economy of Transformation // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 13, No 2. Р. 23-32.
31. Ellman M. (1998). China's Development Zones - Learning from Their Success // Transition: The Newsletter about Reforming Economies. Vol. 9, No 6. Р. 6-7.
32. Ellman M. (2000a). The Russian Economy under El'tsin // Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 52, No 8. Р. 1417-1432.
33. Ellman M. (2000b). The Social Costs and Consequences of the Transformation Process // Economic Survey of Europe. No 2/3, UNECE.
34. Ellman M. (2003a). Transition Economies // H. J. Chang (ed.). Rethinking Development Economics. L.: Anthem.
35. Ellman M. (2003b). Expectations and Reality: Reflections on a Decade of Agricultural Transformation // M. Spoor (ed.). Transition, Institutions and the Rural Sector. Lanham: Lexington.
36. Ellman M. (2006). The Issues // M. Ellman (ed.). Russia's Oil and Natural Gas: Bonanza or Curse? L.: Anthem.
37. Ferraz C., Finan F. (2011). Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments // American Economic Review. Vol. 101, No 4. Р. 1274-1311.
38. Frazier M. (2006). Pensions, Public Opinion, and the Graying of China // Asia Policy. No 1. Р. 43-68.
39. Frydman R., Rapaczynski A. (1997). Corporate Governance and the Political Effects of Privatization // S. Zecchini (ed.). Lessons from Economic Transition, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Frye T. (2010). Building States and Markets after Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Gomulka S. (1995). The IMF-Supported Programs of Poland and Russia, 1990-1994: Principles, Errors and Results // Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 20, No 3. Р. 316-346.
42. Grogan L., Moers L. (2001). Growth Empirics with Institutional Measures for Transition Countries // Economic Systems. Vol. 24, No 4. Р. 1-22.
43. Hedlund S. (2005). Russian Path Dependence: A People with a Troubled History. Abingdon: Routledge.
44. Hedlund S. (2011). Invisible Hands, Russian Experience, and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding Systemic Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. IMF (1990). Yugoslavia Launches Bold Reforms to Combat Hyperinflation // IMF Survey. Vol. 19, No 8. Р. 124-127.
46. Intriligator M. (1996). Reform of the Russian Economy: The Role of Institutions // International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 23, No 10/11. Р. 58-72.
47. Ito T. (2009). The Evolution of Development Economics and East Asia's Contribution // Yusuf (2009).
48. Kornai J. (1994). Transformational Recession: The Main Causes // Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 19, No 1. Р. 39-63.
49. Kuboniwa M. (2012). Diagnosing the 'Russian Disease': Growth and Structure of the Russian Economy // Comparative Economic Studies. Vol. 54, No 1. Р. 121-148.
50. Kydland F. E., Prescott E. C. (1996). The Computational Experiment: An Econometric Tool // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 10, No 1. Р. 69-85.
51. Lewis A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour // Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. Vol. 22, No 2. Р. 139-191.
52. Mathijs E., Swinnen J. (2001). Production Organization and Efficiency during Transition: An Empirical Analysis of East German Agriculture // Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 83, No 1. Р. 100-107.
53. Monaghan A. (2012). The Vertikal: Power and Authority in Russia // International Affairs. Vol. 88, No 1. Р. 1-16.
54. Ngo T.-W. (2008). Rent-Seeking and Economic Governance in the Structural Nexus of Corruption in China // Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 49, No 1. Р. 27-44.
55. Nolan P. (1995). China's Rise, Russia's Fall: Politics, Economics and Planning in the Transition from Stalinism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
56. North D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. North D. (1993). Institutions and Credible Commitment // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 149, No 1. Р. 11-23.
58. Ostrom E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems // American Economic Review. Vol. 100, No 3. Р. 641-672.
59. Polishchuk L. (1997). Missed Markets: Implications for Economic Behavior and Institutional Change // J. Nelson, C. Tilly, L. Walker (eds.). Transforming Post- Communist Political Economies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
60. Pomfret R. (1997). Growth and Transition: Why Has China's Performance Been So Different? // Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 25, No 3. Р. 422-440.
61. Popov V. (2012). Russia: Austerity and Deficit Reduction in Historical and Comparative Perspective // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 36, No 1. Р. 313-334.
62. Robinson J. (1962). Economic Philosophy. London: Watts.
63. Rodrik D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64. Rodrik D. (2010). Diagnostics before Prescription // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 24, No 3. Р. 33-44.
65. Roland G. (1994). The Role of Political Constraints in Transition Strategies // Economics of Transition. Vol. 2, No 1. Р. 27-41.
66. Roland G. (2000). Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Rona-Tas A. (2001). Legacies, Institutions and Markets: Small Entrepreneurship in Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic // J. Beyer, J. Wielgohs, H. Wiesenthal( eds.). Successful Transitions: Political Factors of Socio-Economic Progress in Postsocialist Countries. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
68. Rusinova D. (2010). Economic Development and Growth in Transition Countries. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
69. Sachs J. (1993). Poland's Jump to the Market Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Saidova G., Cornia G. (2005). Linking Macroeconomic Policy to Poverty Reduction in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Center for Economic Research and UNDP.
71. Schmieding H. (1993). From Plan to Market: On the Nature of the Transformation Crisis // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. Vol. 129, No 2. Р. 216-253.
72. Stone R. (2002). Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Post- Communist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
73. Symposium (2002). The IMF and the Ruble Zone // Comparative Economic Studies. Vol. 44, No 4. Р. 1-84.
74. Wijnbergen S. van (1993). Enterprise Reform in Eastern Europe // Economics of Transition. Vol. 1, No 1. Р. 21-38.
75. Visser O. (2008). Crucial Connections: The Persistence of Large Farm Enterprises in Russia. Radboud University Nijmegen, PhD Thesis.
76. Wegren S. (1998). Agriculture and the State in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
77. Williamson J. (1989). What Washington Means by Policy Reform // J. Williamson (ed.). Latin American Readjustment: How Much has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
78. Williamson J. (1992). The Eastern Transition to a Market Economy: A Global Perspective // CEP Occasional Paper. No 2. L.: Centre for Economic Performance.
79. Williamson J. (ed.). (1994). The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
80. World Bank (1992). Food and Agricultural Policy Reforms in the Former USSR: An Agenda for the Transition. Washington, DC: World Bank.
81. World Bank (1993). Uzbekistan: An Agenda for Economic Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
82. Xu C. (2011). The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 49, No 4. Р. 1076-1151.
83. Yakovlev A. (2006). The Evolution of Business - State Interaction in Russia: From State Capture to Business Capture? // Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 57, No 8, Р. 1033-1056.
84. Yusuf S. (2009). Development Economics through the Decades: A Critical Look at Thirty Years of the World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Эллман М. Что исследование переходных экономикдало мейнстриму экономической теории? Вопросы экономики. 2012;(8):98-121. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-8-98-121
For citation:
Ellman M. What Did the Study of Transition EconomiesContribute to Mainstream Economics? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2012;(8):98-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-8-98-121