Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Анализ инновационной деятельности фирм в рамках CDM подхода

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Факторы инновационной деятельности компаний и оценка эффективности инноваций остаются актуальными темами исследований современной экономики. Специфика инновационного процесса обусловила рост популярности структурного моделирования в рамках CDM подхода в академических исследованиях. Он позволяет изучать влияние инновационной деятельности компании на ее экономические результаты. В статье проанализированы эмпирические исследования, осуществленные на основе CDM подхода.

Ключевые слова


JEL: O31, O32, D22, D24

Об авторе

Г. В. Теплых
Высшая школа экономики (Пермь)
Россия
младший научный сотрудник Научно-учебной лаборатории междисциплинарных эмпирических исследований, Национальный исследовательский университет Высшая школа экономики (Пермь)


Список литературы

1. Antonelli C., Colombelli A. (2011). The Generation and Exploitation of Technological Change: Market Value and Total Factor Productivity // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36, No 4. P. 353-382.

2. Benavente J. M. (2006). The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 301-315.

3. Blundell R., Griffith R., Reenen J. van (1999). Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms // The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 66, No 3. P. 529-554.

4. Bond S., Harhoff D., Reenen J. van (2005). Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany // Annals of Economics and Statistics. No 79-80. P. 433-460.

5. Chudnovsky D., López A., Pupato G. (2006). Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001) // Research Policy. Vol. 35, No 2. P. 266-288.

6. Crépon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. (1998). Research Investment, Innovation and Pro d uctivity : an Econometric Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 115-158.

7. Damijan J. P., Kostevc Č., Rojec M. (2012). Does innovation help the good or the poor performing firms? // Economics Letters. Vol. 115, No 2. P. 190-195.

8. Duguet E. (2006). Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4-5. P. 415-442.

9. Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J. van (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries // Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 86, No 4. P. 883-895.

10. Griffith R., Huergo E., Mairesse J., Peters B. (2006). Innovation and Productivity Across four European Countries // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 22, No 4. P. 483-498.

11. Griliches Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function // American Economic Review. Vol. 54, No 6. P. 961-974.

12. Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth // Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, No 1. P. 92-116.

13. Griliches Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14. Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (2005). Market Value and Patent Citations // RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 16-38.

15. Hall B. H., Mairesse J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge-Driven Economy // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 289-299.

16. Hall B. H. (2011). Innovation and Productivity // NBER Working Papers. No 17178.

17. Heshmati A. (2009). A Generalized Knowledge Production Function // IFCAI University Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 6, No 1. P. 7-39.

18. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. (1999). International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 8, No 1/2. P. 105-136.

19. Janz N., Lööf H., Peters B. (2004). Innovation and Productivity in German and Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Is there a Common Story? // Problems & Perspectives in Management. No 2. P. 184-204.

20. Jefferson G., Huamao B., Xiaojing G., Xiaoyun Y. (2006). R&D Performance in Chinese Industry // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 345-366.

21. Johansson B., Lööf H. (2008). Innovation Activities Explained by Firm Attributes and L ocation // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 533-552.

22. Koch A., Strotmann H. (2008). Absorptive Capacity and Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Business Service Sector // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 511-531.

23. Leeuwen G. van, Klomp L. (2006). On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-factor Productivity Growth // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 367-390.

24. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2002). Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A Firm-Level Innovation Study // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 76, No 1. P. 61-85.

25. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2006). On the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 317-344.

26. Lööf H., Heshmati A., Asplund R., Nääs S. (2003). Innovation and Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries // ICFAI Journal of Management Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 5-36.

27. Mairesse J., Mohnen P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application // The American Economic Review. Vol. 92, No 2. P. 226-230.

28. Mairesse J., Robin S. (2009). Innovation and Productivity: A Firm-level Analysis for French Manufacturing and Services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Paris: CREST-ENSAE.

29. Mansfield E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development // American Economic Review. Vol. 55, No 1/2. P. 310-322.

30. Mansury M. A., Love J. H. (2008). Innovation, Productivity and Growth in US Business Services: A Firm-level Analysis // Technovation. Vol. 28, No 1/2. P. 52-62.

31. Masso J., Vahter P. (2008). Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys // The European Journal of Development Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 240-261.

32. Minasian J. R. (1969). Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return // The American Economic Review. Vol. 59, No 2. P. 80-85.

33. Musolesi A., Huiban J. (2010). Innovation and Productivity in Knowledge Intensive Business Services // Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 34, No 1. P. 63-81.

34. Ornaghi C. (2006). Spillovers in Product and Process Innovation: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms // International Journal of Industrial Organization. Vol. 24, No 2. P. 349-380.

35. Pakes A., Griliches Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look // R&D, Patents, and Productivity / Z. Griliches (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 55-72.

36. Parisi M.L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. (2006). Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy // European Economic Review. Vol. 50, No 8. P. 2037-2061.

37. Ramania S. V., El Aroui M.A., Carrère M. (2008). On Estimating a Knowledge Production Function at the Firm and Sector Level Using Patent Statistics // Research Policy. Vol. 37, No 9. P. 1568-1578.

38. Raymond W., Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Palm F. (2013). Dynamic Models of R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing // NBER Working Papers. No 19074.

39. Roud V. (20 07). Firm-level Research on Innovation and Productivity: Russian Experience // Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands.

40. Teplykh G. V. (2014). Innovations and Productivity: The Shift During the 2008 Crisis // HSE Working Papers. No WP BRP 23/STI/2014.

41. Vakhitova G., Pavlenko T. (2010). Innovation and Productivity: a Firm Level Study of Ukrainian Manufacturing Sector // Kyiv School of Economics Working Papers. No 27.

42. Wakelin K. (2001). Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms // Research policy. Vol. 30, No 7. P. 1079-1090.


Для цитирования:


Теплых Г.В. Анализ инновационной деятельности фирм в рамках CDM подхода. Вопросы экономики. 2014;(7):51-65. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65

For citation:


Teplykh G. Modeling of Firms Innovation Activitywithin the CDM approach. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014;(7):51-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65

Просмотров: 76


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)