|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Assessing the impact of the instruments of monetary policy on achieving objectives of the central bank of RF
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-106-118
Abstract
In this paper, using an econometric model (the model with Markov switchings), monetary policy of the Russian Federation in 2001—2011 is studied, based on the Taylor rule. CBR’s policy priorities in relation to inflation and the exchange rate in the given period are identified. Monetary tools are revealed, which support the mode selected by the CBR.
About the Authors
E. Fedorova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. Lysenkova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Andryushin S., Kuznetsova V. (2011). Monetary Policy Priorities of Central Banks in New Conditions // Voprosy Ekonomiki. No 6. P. 57—70.
2. Dmitrieva O., Ushakov D. (2011). Demand-pull and Cost-push Inflation: Factors of Origination and Forms of Expansion // Voprosy Ekonomiki. No 3. P. 40—52.
3. Dolotenkova L. (2003). The Influence of the Balance of Payments on the Exchange Rate: A Statistical Analysis of the Short-term Dynamics // Rynok Tsennykh Bumag. No 23. P. 42—44.
4. Kruglov V. V. (ed.) (1998). Fundamentals of International Monetary and Credit Relations: A Textbook. Moscow: Infra-M.
5. Lukasevich I. Ya., Fedorova E. A. et al. (2012). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Monetary Policy of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation during the Financial Crisis // Problemy Prognozirovaniya. No 1. P. 109—116.
6. Moiseev S. R. (2002). Rules of Monetary Policy // Finansy i Kredit. No 16. P. 37—46.
7. Plushchevskaya J. (2012). On the Validity of the Theoretical Bases of Inflation Targeting and New Keynesian General Equilibrium Models // Voprosy Ekonomiki. No 5. P. 22—36.
8. Fedorova E. A., Polikarpova A. A. (2013). The Use of the Taylor Rule for Russia: An Empirical Analysis // Finansy i Kredit. No 14. P. 2—6.
9. Yudaeva K., Ivanova N. et al. (2010). What Does Bank of Russia Target? // Survey of the Center for Macroeconomic Studies / Sberbank of Russia. Moscow.
10. Aizenman J., Hutchison M. et al. (2010). Inflation Targeting and Real Exchange Rates in Emerging Markets // World Development. Vol. 39, No 5. P. 712—724.
11. Ding Z. (2012). An Implementation of Markov Regime Switching Model with Time Varying Transition Probabilities in Matlab. Mimeo. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2083332 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2083332.
12. Esanov A., Merkl Ch. et al. (2004). Monetary Policy Rules for Russia // BOFIT Discussion Papers. No 11.
13. Golinelli R., Rovelli R. (2005). Monetary Policy Transmission, Interest Rate Rules and Inflation Targeting in Three Transition Countries // Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol. 29, No 1. P. 183—201.
14. McKinnon R. (2007). Exchange Rates and Trade Balances under the Dollar Standard: The Transfer Problem Reconsidered // AEA-Sponsored Round Table for ASSA. “U.S. Trade Deficits, the Dollar and International Monetary Stability”. Chicago, Jan. 6.
15. Perlin M. (2012). MS_Regress — The MATLAB Package for Markov Regime Switching Models. Mimeo. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1714016 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1714016.
16. Qiao Н. (2005). Exchange Rates and Trade Balances under the Dollar Standard // Stanford Center for International Development Working Paper. No 259.
17. Taylor J. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice // Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Vol. 39. P. 195—214.
18. Timmermann A. (2000). Moments of Markov Switching Models // Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 96, No 1. P. 75—111.
Review
For citations:
Fedorova E., Lysenkova A. Assessing the impact of the instruments of monetary policy on achieving objectives of the central bank of RF. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2013;(9):106-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-106-118
Views:
629
Email this article 
