

The trap of narratives: The impact of scientific hypotheses on the effectiveness of economic policy
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-126-141
Abstract
The article presents some of the author’s reflections on the role played by economic narratives in the formation of economic policy in Russia in the first quarter of the 21st century. In the author’s opinion, by now Russian economic policy has found itself in the “trap of narratives” that have dominated the intellectual economic environment for at least 20 years. The author notes a shift in the semantics of scientific research, which is expressed in the gradual decline in the popularity of economic growth and increased attention to monetary factors of development, inflation and financial stability. At the same time, the article shows that the Bank of Russia assumed the role of the main macroeconomic ideologist and regulator, and the key rate became the most important instrument of its monetary policy. The author defines the focus of the regulator’s efforts on monetary instruments of economic policy and, above all, the interest rate as a “narrative trap”. The author presents his view on how and why this economy found itself in this trap, hoping that his conclusions will help in the search for new approaches to the management of complex economic processes in a difficult period of global economic transformation.
Keywords
JEL: A11, E4, E5
About the Author
V. D. MilovidovRussian Federation
Vladimir D. Milovidov, head of chair of international finance department of Moscow state institute of international relations, deputy director of IMEMO RAS, doctor of economics, correspondent member of RAS
Moscow
References
1. Grishhenko V., Lymar M., Sinyakov A. (2025). What information is important for households’ inflation expectations: A randomized controlled trial. Bank of Russia Working Papers, No. 148.
2. Zhukovskiy Y. G. (1909). The 19th century and its moral culture. St. Peterburg: Tipografiya V. F. Kirshbauma. (In Russian).
3. Mogilat A. (2017). Review of the main channels of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy and tools for their analysis in the Bank of Russia. Russian Journal of Money and Credit, No. 9, pp. 3—9. (In Russian).
4. Mogilat A., Moskaleva A., Popova S., Turdyeva N., Tsoy V. (2024). Interest expenses of Russian companies. Analytical note. Moscow: Bank of Russia. (In Russian).
5. Austin J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Bernanke B. S., Laubach T., Mishkin F. S., Posen A. S. (1999). Inflation targeting: Lessons from the international experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv301gdr
7. Bernanke B. S. (ed.) (2024). Forecasting for monetary policy making and communication at the Bank of England: A review. London: Bank of England.
8. Boulding K. B. (1969). Economics as a moral science. American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1—12.
9. Callon M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. Sociological Review, Vol. 46, No. 1 suppl., pp. 1—57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x
10. Callon M. (2006). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? CSI Working Papers Series, No. 005. Paris: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation Ecole des Mines de Paris.
11. Ehrmann M. (2021). Point targets, tolerance bands, or target ranges? Inflation target types and the anchoring of inflation expectation. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 132, аrticle 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103514
12. Friedman M. (1977). Nobel lecture: Inflation and unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 3, pp. 451—472. https://doi.org/10.1086/260579
13. Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
14. Milovidov V. (2023). Redefining investors’ goals in the post—normal world. Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 371—385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-07-2022-0191
15. Merton R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, Vol. 159, No. 3810, pp. 1—8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
16. Mishkin F. S. (2000). Inflation targeting in emerging market countries. NBER Working Paper, No. 7618. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7618.
17. Pollin R., Zhu A. (2006). Inflation and economic growth: A cross-country nonlinear analysis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 593—614. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477280404
18. Sedlacek T. (2011). Economics of goods and evil. The quest for economics meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Sharpe W., Litterman R. (2014). Past, present, and future financial thinking. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 70, No. 6, pp. 16—22. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v70.n6.1
20. Shiller R. J. (2019). Narrative economics. How stories go viral and drive major economics events. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Silva T. C., Moriya K., Veyrune R. M. (2025). From text to quantified insights: А large-scale LLM analysis of central bank communication. IMF Working Рaper, No. 2025/109. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229013802.001
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Milovidov V.D. The trap of narratives: The impact of scientific hypotheses on the effectiveness of economic policy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(9):126-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-126-141