сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Политические идеологии и экономика
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-5-26
Аннотация
Процессы, происходящие последние годы в мировой экономике, демонстрируют, что идеологические убеждения, главенствующие в разных странах, ощутимо влияют на проводимую в них экономическую политику, а положения экономической науки иногда значимо на нее не воздействуют. Хотя влияние политических идеологий на экономику затрагивалось и на макро-, и на микроуровне экономических процессов, сами идеологии как разновидности субъективной информации редко становились объектами анализа с точки зрения экономической науки, включая когнитивную экономику. Проанализированы имеющиеся подходы к экономическому анализу политических идеологий и предложены на этой основе некоторые уточнения разработанных концепций. Задача этих уточнений — очертить возможности и ограничения на пути целенаправленного создания идеологий, которые, получив широкую поддержку избирателей, обеспечили бы успешное достижение целей проводимой государством экономической политики. Проведенный анализ имеет междисциплинарный характер, опираясь на результаты, полученные в рамках экономической, политической и биологической наук, а также социальной и политической психологии и нейронауки.
Ключевые слова
ментальные модели,
убеждения,
идеология,
биологические основы,
психологические основы,
выбор идеологии
JEL: D11, D83
Об авторе
В. Л. Тамбовцев
Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович, д. э. н., проф., гл. н. с. лаборатории институционального анализа экономического факультета
Москва
Список литературы
1. Adrián-Ventura J., Avendaño D., Miró-Padilla A., Cherednichenko A., Ávila C., Fasce A. (2025). Authoritarianism and the brain: Structural MR correlates associated with polarized left- and right-wing ideology traits. Neuroscience, Vol. 575, pp. 95—103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.027
2. Aidt T. S., Gassebner M. (2010). Do autocratic states trade less? World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 38—76. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp022
3. Alford J. R., Funk C. L., Hibbing J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 153—167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579
4. Azevedo F., Jost J. T., Rothmund T., Sterling J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 49—88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310
5. Bargh J. A., Chartrand T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, Vol. 54, No. 7, pp. 462—479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
6. Bartolo A., Powell C. (2024). Associations between the dark tetrad and political orientation: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 218, article 112498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112498
7. Barton A. H., Parsons R. W. (1977). Measuring belief system structure. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 159—180. https://doi.org/10.1086/268372
8. Belke A., Potrafke N. (2012). Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1126—1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014
9. Berger P. L., Luckmann T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
10. Besley T., Persson T. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American Economic Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 1218—1244. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1218
11. Besley T., Persson T. (2010). State capacity, conflict, and development. Econometrica, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 1—34. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8073
12. Bjørnskov C. (2005). Does political ideology affect economic growth? Public Choice, Vol. 123, pp. 133—146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-0263-3
13. Boyer P., Petersen M. B. (2018). Folk-economic beliefs: An evolutionary cognitive model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, article e158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001960
14. Brown S. R. (1970). Consistency and the persistence of ideology: Some experimental results. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 60—68. https://doi.org/10.1086/267773
15. Carney D. R., Jost J. T., Gosling S. D., Potter J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 807—840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
16. Carruthers B. G. (1994). When is the state autonomous? Culture, organization theory, and the political sociology of the state. Sociological Theory, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 19—44. https://doi.org/10.2307/202033
17. Chan E. Y., Ilicic J. (2019). Political ideology and brand attachment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 630—646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.04.001
18. Claessens S., Chaudhuri A., Sibley C. G., Atkinson Q. D. (2022). The evolutionary basis of political ideology. In: D. Osborne, C. G. Sibley (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 22—36. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779104.003
19. Converse P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: D. E. Apter (ed.). Ideology and discontent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 206—261.
20. Costello T. H., Lilienfeld S. O. (2020). Social and economic political ideology consistently operate as mutual suppressors: Implications for personality, social, and political psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 1425—1436. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gq4js
21. Crawford T. J., Brandt M. J., Inbar Y., Chambers R. J., Motyl M. (2017). Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 383—412. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000074
22. Cui Y., van Esch P. (2022). Autonomy and control: How political ideology shapes the use of artificial intelligence. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1218—1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21649
23. Czarnek G., Jaśko K., Dudek I. A., Piotrowska M. L. (2024). Beyond content: Psychological structure of political beliefs. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z3cyr
24. de Waal F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. DeCanio S. (2000). Beyond Marxist state theory: State autonomy in democratic societies. Critical Review, Vol. 14, No. 2—3, pp. 215—236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810008443558
26. Denzau A. T., North D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 3—31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
27. Denzau A. T., North D. C., Roy R. K. (2006). Shared mental models: A postscript. In: R. K. Roy, A. T. Denzau, T. D. Willett (eds.). Neoliberalism: National and regional experiments with global ideas. London: Routledge, pp. 14—25.
28. Downs A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 135—150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897
29. Duckitt J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, pp. 41—113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
30. Duckitt J., Sibley C. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dualprocess motivational model. Journal of Personality, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1861—1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
31. Dutt P., Mitra D. (2005). Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 59—72. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327621
32. Farmer A., Kidwell B., Hardesty D. M. (2020). Helping a few a lot or many a little: Political ideology and charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 614—630. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1164
33. Feldman S., Huddy L. (2014). Not so simple: The multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 312—313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002562
34. Feldman S., Johnston C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 337—358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
35. Festinger L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, СА: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766
36. Fine G. A., Sandstrom K. (1993). Ideology in action: A pragmatic approach to a contested concept. Sociological Theory, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 21—38. https://doi.org/10.2307/201978
37. Fournier P., Petersen M. B., Soroka S. (2021). The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity. Electoral Studies, Vol. 72, article 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102347
38. Friston K. J. (2018). Active inference and cognitive consistency. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 67—73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1480693
39. Gerring J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 957—994. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412
40. Gintis H., van Schaik C. (2013). Zoon politicon: The evolutionary roots of human sociopolitical systems. In: P. J. Richerson, M. H. Christiansen (eds.). Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 25—44. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9894.003.0005
41. Gohary A., Madani F., Chan E. Y., Tavallaei S. (2023). Political ideology and fair-trade consumption: A social dominance orientation perspective. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 156, article 113535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113535
42. Gries T., Müller V., Jost J. T. (2022). The market for belief systems: A formal model of ideological choice. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 65—83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065128
43. Hayek F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 33—54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548786
44. Hibbing J. R., Smith K. B., Alford J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 297—350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192
45. Hinich M. J., Munger M. C. (1994). Ideology and the theory of public choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.13147
46. Ianoni M. (2013). Autonomy of the state and development in the democratic capitalism. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 33, Nо. 4, pp. 577—598. https:// doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572013000400002
47. Jędryczka W. (2022). Can history of parasitic diseases increase social conservatism? Testing behavioural immune system theory. Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 383—394. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.2.383.394
48. Jones N. A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, Vol. 16, No. 1, article 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03802-160146
49. Jost J. T. (2017). The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 502—520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.003
50. Jost J. T., Federico C. M., Napier J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 60, pp. 307—337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
51. Jost J. T., Federico C. M., Napier J. L. (2013). Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In: M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, M. Stears (eds.). The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford, UK & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 232—250. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0024
52. Jost J. T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A. W., Sulloway F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 129, No. 3, pp. 339—375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
53. Kalmoe N. P., Johnson M. (2022). Genes, ideology, and sophistication. Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 255—266. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2021.4
54. Kim J. C., Park B., Dubois D. (2018). How consumers’ political ideology and status-maintenance goals interact to shape their desire for luxury goods. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 132—149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918799699
55. Koch A., Dotsch R., Imhoff R., Unkelbach C., Alves H. (2025). Ideological beliefs as cues to exploitation-exploration behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 117, article 104718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104718
56. Kruglanski A. W., Jasko K., Milyavsky M., Chernikova M., Webber D., Pierro A., di Santo D. (2018). Cognitive consistency theory in social psychology: A paradigm reconsidered. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 45—59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1480619
57. Lange O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism: Рart one. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53—71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967660
58. Lange O. (1937). On the economic theory of socialism: Рart two. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 123—142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967609
59. Lasswell H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Lerner A. P. (1934). Economic theory and socialist economy. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 51—61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967550
61. Leung K., Bond M. H., de Carrasquel S. R. et al. (2002). Social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 286—302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033003005
62. Maner J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 526—531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417714323
63. Maner J. K., Case C. R. (2016). Dominance and prestige: Dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 54, pp. 129—180. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.02.001
64. Mantzavinos C., North D. C., Shariq S. (2004). Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 75—84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635
65. Mathur A., Moschis G. P. (2022). Do personal values and political ideology affect sustainable consumption? Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 23, article 15512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315512
66. Mises L. von (1944). Omnipotent government: The rise of the total state and total war. New Haven: Yale University Press.
67. Moazzam A. A. (2017). Understanding ideology: Dimensions and influences. Journal of Politics & Governance, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 5—10. https://doi.org/10.5958/2456-8023.2017.00001.8
68. Murphy R. H., O’Reilly C. (2020). Assessing state capacity libertarianism. Cato Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 735—767. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3522671
69. Neuner F. G., Wratil C. (2022). The populist marketplace: Unpacking the role of “thin” and “thick” ideology. Political Behavior, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 551—574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09629-y
70. Nickerson R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 175—220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
71. North D. C. (1988). Ideology and political/economic institutions. Cato Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1 pp. 15—28.
72. Polidano C. (2001). Don’t discard state autonomy: Revisiting the East Asian experience of development. Political Studies, Vol. 49, pp. 513—527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00324
73. Rasmussen S. H. R., Weinschenk A., Nørgaard A. S., von Bornemann Hjelmborg J., Klemmensen R. (2023). Educational attainment has a causal effect on economic, but not social ideology: Evidence from discordant twins. Political Studies, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 256—275. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211008788
74. Rossi-Landi F. (1978). Ideologia. Milano: ISEDI.
75. Roy R. K., Denzau A. T. (2020). Shared mental models: Insights and perspectives on ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 323—340. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12244
76. Roy R. K., Denzau A. T., Willett T. D. (2006). Introduction: Neoliberalism as a shared mental model. In: R. K. Roy, A. T. Denzau, T. D. Willett (eds.). Neoliberalism: National and regional experiments with global ideas. London: Routledge, pp. 3—13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020661
77. Różycka-Tran J., Boski P., Wojciszke B. (2015). Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4 pp. 525—548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115572226
78. Rubin P. H. (2003). Folk economics. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 157—171. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00561.x
79. Schumpeter J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
80. Shavitt S. (2017). Political ideology drives consumer psychology: Introduction to research dialogue. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 500—501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.09.001
81. Simon D., Read S. J. (2018). Neither cognitive nor consistency: A comment on “Cognitive consistency theory in social psychology: A paradigm reconsidered”. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 97—108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1480683
82. Smith M. (2024). Is it ever rational to hold inconsistent beliefs? Philosophical Studies, Vol. 181, No. 12, pp. 3459—3475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02198-4
83. Sommer J., Musolino J., Hemmer P. (2023). A hobgoblin of large minds: Troubles with consistency in belief. WIREs Cognitive Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, article e1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1639
84. Stoica G. L., Salgür S. A. (2013). Ideology under the analysts’ scrutiny and patterns of democracy. South-East European Journal of Political Science, Vol. I, No. 3, pp. 3—11.
85. Swedlow B., Wyckoff M. L. (2009). Value preferences and ideological structuring of attitudes in American public opinion. American Politics Research, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1048—1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09333959
86. Tawiah V., Zakari A. (2024). Government political ideology and green innovation: Evidence from OECD countries. Economic Change and Restructuring, Vol. 57, article 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09712-y
87. Terrizzi J. A., Jr., Shook N. J., McDaniel M. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 99—108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003
88. Tomkins S. S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In: R. W. White (ed.). The study of lives: Essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 388—411. https://doi.org/10.1037/12238-017
89. Tybur J. M., Lieberman D., Kurzban R., DeScioli P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, Vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 65—84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030778
90. Usslepp T., Awanis S., Hogg M. K., Daryanto A. (2022). The inhibitory effect of political conservatism on consumption: The case of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 176, No. 3, pp. 519—531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04689-w
91. Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186—204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
92. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425—478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
93. Wang Q.-J., Feng G.-F., Chen Y. E., Wen J., Chang C.-P. (2019). The impacts of government ideology on innovation: What are the main implications? Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 1232—1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.009
94. Wang Y. (2022). Executive agency and state capacity in development. Comparative Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 349—374. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522X16225661565091
95. Warncke P., Azevedo F. (2024). Boundless but bundled: Modelling quasi-infinite dimensions in ideological space. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tjgpc
96. Whiteside S. P., Lynam D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 669—689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7
97. Wolff I., Folli D. (2024). Why is belief—action consistency so low? The role of belief uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 227, article 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106722
98. Wu Q., Zheng L., Hasan T. (2022). CEOs’ political ideologies and innovation: Evidence from US public firms. Economic and Political Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 353—367. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2022.2095090
99. Zmigrod L. (2020). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: Theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 34, pp. 34—39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016
Дополнительные файлы
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тамбовцев В.Л. Политические идеологии и экономика. Вопросы экономики. 2025;(9):5-26. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-5-26
For citation:
Tambovtsev V.L. Political ideology and economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(9):5-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-5-26
Просмотров:
13
Послать статью по эл. почте 
