|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Cognitive institutions: In search of new behavioral foundations of economics
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-46-65
Abstract
Throughout the 20th century, economics followed the lead of cognitive science, but in the 21st century it has fallen behind. Cognitive scientists are actively developing the theory of extended cognition, which has gone through three stages (waves) since the mid-1990s. All three waves are based on the ideas of institutional economists, with the third wave associated with the construction of a theory of socially extended cognition based on cognitive institutions. The article offers a substantive analysis of three waves of the development of the theory of extended cognition in the context of interactions with the ideas of institutional economics. Based on this analysis, the first “sprouts” of the theory of extended cognition in different areas of economic research are assessed. In the future, we should expect an update of the behavioral foundations of economics based on the ideas of socially extended cognition, but this process will be uneven.
Keywords
cognitive processes,
methodological individualism,
internalism,
extended cognition,
rationality,
cognitive institutions
JEL: A12, B41, B52
About the Author
D. P. Frolov
Volgograd State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daniil P. Frolov
Volgograd
References
1. Veblen T. (1984). The theory of the leisure class. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
2. Kahneman D. (2005). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In: World economic thought. Through the prism of centuries (In 5 vols., Vol. 5: World recognition: Lectures by Nobel laureates. In 2 books. Book 2). Moscow: Mysl. P. 630—684. (In Russian).
3. Knyazeva E. N. (2018). Cognizing body and moving mind: The conceptual turn in epistemology. In: I. T. Kasavin, N. N. Voronina (eds.). Epistemology today. Ideas, problems, discussions. N. Novgorod: Publishing House of the Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky. P. 339—350. (In Russian).
4. North D. (2010). Understanding the process of economic change. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
5. Hayek F. (2020). Collected works in 19 volumes (Vol. 15: The market and other orders). Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Socium. (In Russian).
6. Allen D. W. E., Berg C., Davidson S. (2023). Repugnant innovation. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 918—929. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000364
7. Anderson M. L. (2016). Précis of after phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 39, article e120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000631
8. Banerjee S., Mitra S. (2023). Behavioural public policies for the social brain. Behavioural Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.15
9. Bicchieri C. (2023). Norm nudging and twisting preferences. Behavioural Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 914—923. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.5
10. Bicchieri C., Dimant E. (2022). Nudging with care: Тhe risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice, Vol. 191, No. 3—4, pp. 443—464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6
11. Boettke P. J. (2018). F.A. Hayek: Economics, political economy and social philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41160-0
12. Clark A. (1996). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001
13. Clark A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Clark A., Chalmers D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 7—19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
15. Colombo M., Irvine E., Stapleton M. (eds.) (2019). Andy Clark and his critics. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190662813.001.0001
16. Connolly D. J., Loewenstein G., Chater N. (2024). An s-frame agenda for behavioral public policy research. Behavioural Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.58
17. Dannenberg A., Gallier C. (2020). The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: А survey of experimental research. Experimental Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 716—749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629-8
18. Dekker E. (2022). How cognitive institutions and interpretative rationality enable markets with infinite variety. In: D. J. D’Amico, A. G. Martin (eds.). Contemporary methods and austrian economics. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 151—167. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-213420220000026012
19. Dekker E., Remic B. (2024). Hayek’s extended mind: Оn the (im)possibility of Austrian behavioural economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 20, article e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137424000055
20. Dengsø M. J., Kirchhoff M. D. (2023). Beyond individual-centred 4E cognition: Systems biology and sympoiesis. Constructivist Foundations, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 351—364.
21. Denzau A. T., North D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 3—31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
22. Dequech D. (2003). Cognitive and cultural embeddedness: Сombining institutional economics and economic sociology. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 461—470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506594
23. Devereaux A., Koppl R., Kauffman S. (2024). Creative evolution in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 489—514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-024-00855-9
24. Di Iorio F. (2015). Hayek and the hermeneutics of mind. Social Science Information, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 177—191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018414566420
25. Dingemanse M., Liesenfeld A., Rasenberg M., Albert S., Ameka F. K., Birhane A., Bolis D., Cassell J., Clift R., Cuffari E., De Jaegher H., Novaes C. D., Enfield N. J., Fusaroli R., Gregoromichelaki E., Hutchins E., Konvalinka I., Milton D., Raczaszek Leonardi J., Reddy V., Rossano F., Schlangen D., Seibt J., Stokoe E., Suchman L., Vesper C., Wheatley T., Wiltschko M. (2023). Beyond singlemindedness: A figure-ground reversal for the cognitive sciences. Cognitive Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, article e13230. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13230
26. Dosi G., Napoletano M., Roventini A., Stiglitz J. E., Treibich T. (2020). Rational heuristics? Expectations and behaviors in evolving economies with heterogeneous interacting agents. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 1487—1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12897
27. Frolov D. (2023). Post-Northian institutional economics: А research agenda for cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 175—191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000285
28. Frolov D. (2024a). Digital capitalism and new institutionalism. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267430
29. Frolov D. (2024b). The economics of cognitive institutions: Mapping debates, looking ahead. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 20, article e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742400016X
30. Gallagher S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 25—26, pp. 4—12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008
31. Gallagher S. (2023). Embodied and enactive approaches to cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009209793
32. Gallagher S., Crisafi A. (2009). Mental institutions. Topoi, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 45—51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9045-0
33. Gallagher S., Hutto D. D., Slaby J., Cole J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 421—422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002105
34. Gallagher S., Mastrogiorgio A., Petracca E. (2019). Economic reasoning and interaction in socially extended market institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, article 1856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00674
35. Gallagher S., Petracca E. (2024). Trust as the glue of cognitive institutions. Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 216—239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2134767
36. Gallagher S., Petracca E. (2025). Where is the norm? Cognitive institutions and the “where” question. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming].
37. Gallagher S., Petracca E., Mastrogiorgio A. (2025). The economic spectrum: Interdependence and interaction in institutions. New York: Oxford University Press, [forthcoming].
38. Gigerenzer G. (2021). Axiomatic rationality and ecological rationality. Synthese, Vol. 198, No. 4, pp. 3547—3564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02296-5
39. Greif A., Mokyr J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25—52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000370
40. Hodgson G. M. (2007). Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 211—226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780701394094
41. Hodgson G. M. (2025). Formal and informal institutions: Some problems of meaning, impact, and interaction. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 21, article e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137424000249
42. Kirchhoff M. D. (2012). Extended cognition and fixed properties: Steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 287—308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9237-8
43. Knight J., North D. (1997). Explaining economic change: The interplay between cognition and institutions. Legal Theory, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 211—226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000768
44. Markey-Towler B. (2019). Rules, perception and emotion: When do institutions determine behaviour? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 381—396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000267
45. Maselli A., Gordon J., Eluchans M., Lancia G.L., Thiery T., Moretti R., Cisek P., Pezzulo G. (2023). Beyond simple laboratory studies: Developing sophisticated models to study rich behavior. Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 46, pp. 220—244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.006
46. Menary R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592889
47. Merrick W. (2022). But does the nudge fit? Institutional structure and behavioural insights. Behavioural Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.36
48. Mitchell W. C. (1910). The rationality of economic activity: II. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 197—216. https://doi.org/10.1086/251677
49. Muñoz F. F., Encinar M. I. (2019). Some elements for a definition of an evolutionary efficiency criterion. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 919—937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00608-z
50. Oliver A. (2024). On choice inconsistency: Тhe ‘error’ error in behavioural paternalism. Behavioural Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.52
51. Pessoa L. (2015). Précis on the cognitive-emotional brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 38, article e71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000120
52. Petit E., Ballet J. (2025). Bringing emotions into post-Northian institutional economics: A reading inspired by John Dewey. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming].
53. Petracca E. (2017). A cognition paradigm clash: Simon, situated cognition and the interpretation of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 20—40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2017.1279742
54. Petracca E. (2021). Embodying bounded rationality: From embodied bounded rationality to embodied rationality. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, article 710607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710607.
55. Petracca E., Gallagher S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 747—765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000144
56. Petracca E., Gallagher S. (2024). Trust and reliance in the cognitive institutions of cryptocurrency. Mind & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-024-00302-z
57. Rizzo M. J., Whitman G. (2020). Escaping paternalism: Rationality, behavioral economics, and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139061810
58. Rolla G. (2021). Reconceiving rationality: Situating rationality into radically enactive cognition. Synthese, Vol. 198, No. 1, pp. 571—590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02362-y
59. Satz D., Ferejohn J. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 91, No. 2, pp. 71—87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940928
60. Schmidt R. (2024). A model for choice infrastructure: Looking beyond choice architecture in Behavioral Public Policy. Behavioural Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 415—440. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.44
61. Slaby J. (2014). Emotions and the extended mind. In: C. von Scheve, M. Salmela (eds.). Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 32—46. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659180.003.0003
62. Slors M. (2020). From notebooks to institutions: Тhe case for symbiotic cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, article 674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00674
63. Sparkman G., Howe L., Walton G. (2021). How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution. Behavioural Public Policy, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 528—555. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.42
64. Sunstein C. R. (2023). Hayekian behavioral economics. Behavioural Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 170—188. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.3
65. Sutton J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind and the civilizing process. In: R. Menary (ed.). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33—81. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0009
66. Van der Linden S. (2018). The future of behavioral insights: Оn the importance of socially situated nudges. Behavioural Public Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 207—217. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.22
67. Viale R. (2021). Why bounded rationality? In: R. Viale (ed.). Routledge handbook of bounded rationality. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 1—54. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658353-1
68. Whitman G. (2022). Austrian behavioral economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 449—466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000084
69. Wilson R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind. The individual in the fragile sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. World Bank (2015). Mind, society, and behavior: World development report 2015. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Frolov D.P. Cognitive institutions: In search of new behavioral foundations of economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(5):46-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-46-65
Views:
232
Email this article 
