

Process approach to assessing technological convergence of Russian regions: Dynamics of the innovation gap
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-130-152
Abstract
The regional innovation subsystem is considered an integral part of the broader regional socio-economic system, influencing and being influenced by the production, social, ecological, and other subsystems. A process-based approach to assessing the technological gap is proposed, viewing innovation activity as a set of interrelated stages, from resource base formation to the generation of specific outcomes such as new products, processes, and services. The assessment of the technological gap in regional innovation subsystems is suggested to be conducted through the analysis of resource factors and outcomes of technological development. Convergence assessment methods are employed to identify technological gaps among Russian regions, allowing for the detection of convergence or divergence in regional technological development levels. The study reveals that technological β-convergence was not consistently observed throughout the analyzed period. Signs of technological divergence were identified during 2000—2008 and 2009—2013. However, during 2014—2018 and 2019—2022, signs of β-convergence emerged. The shift from negative to positive convergence after 2014 coincides with substantial changes in state innovation policy, including policies on import substitution, the initiation of the National Technology Initiative, and the implementation of national projects. taking into account resource indicators, the results of β-convergence evaluation, demonstrate a significant impact of these factors on the nature and pace of technological convergence. The findings have substantial practical implications for shaping public policy aimed at reducing technological disparities among Russian regions. Differentiated strategies for innovation development must be devised for various regional groups: regions experiencing persistent divergence require priority support measures and resource concentration to overcome institutional barriers; regions with unstable convergence need stabilization of conditions for innovative activities; leading regions should focus on supporting mechanisms for technology diffusion into other regions.
Keywords
JEL: R10
About the Authors
A. G. AtaevaRussian Federation
Aisylu G. Ataeva
Moscow
A. Y. Klimenteva
Russian Federation
Anna Y. Klimenteva
Ufa
References
1. Avdulov A. N., Kulkin A. M. (2010). Paradigm of modern scientific and technical development: A monograph. Moscow: RAS. INION. Center for Scientific Information Research in Science, Education and Technology. (In Russian).
2. Akelyev E. S. (2013). Technology gap and innovation diffusion as the most important components of economy transformation in the context of evolution theory. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, No. 12, pp. 57—61. (In Russian).
3. Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P. (2016). Innovation cycle as a basic model of the dynamics and organization of innovation activity. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, No. 1, pp. 117—127. (In Russian).
4. Byvshev V. I., Panteleeva I. A., Pisarev I. V. (2024). Differentiation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for the implementation of regional scientific, technological and innovation policy. Economy of Regions, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 702—717. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-3-7
5. Gokhberg L. M., Kuznetsova I. A. (2009). Innovations in the Russian economy: Stagnation on the eve of the crisis? Foresight, No. 2, pp. 28—46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2009.2.28.46
6. Doroshenko Y. A., Starikova M. S., Ryapukhina V. N. (2022). Identification of models of industrial-innovative development of regional economic systems. Economy of Regions, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 78—91. (In Russian).
7. Dutov A. V., Klochkov V. V. (2020). Methods for assessing the impact of technologies on the characteristics of advanced products and achieving the goals of scientific and technological development (using civil aircraft construction as an example). Economy of Science, Vol. 6, No. 1—2, pp. 35—45. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2020-6-1-2-35-45
8. Emelianova E. Y., Lapochkina V. V., Shkilev I. N. (2022). Russia’s position in the world in terms of scientific and technological development. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 64—101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1-64-101
9. Zhilnikov A. Y. (2013). Identification of stimulating and constraining factors of regional innovation activity. Economics and Management, No. 2, pp. 77—82. (In Russian).
10. Zemtsov S. P., Demidova K. V., Kichaev D. Y. (2022). Internet diffusion and interregional digital divide in Russia: Trends, factors, and the influence of the pandemic. Baltic Region, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 57—78. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-4
11. Kadochnikova E. I. (2020). Convergence of economic growth and digitalization of households: Spatial analysis of interrelation with regional panel data. Actual Рroblems of Еconomics and Law, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 487—507. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.3.487-507
12. Kurilova A. A. (2025). Analysis of the convergence of digital inequality across Russian regions. Baltic Region, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 117—140. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2025-1-7
13. Simatov K. P. (2019). State regulation of innovation activity in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika i Sotsium, No. 4, pp. 806—810. (In Russian).
14. Frolov D. P., Babkin M. M. (2016). NBIC-convergence in the regional dimension. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, No. 12, pp. 122—142. (In Russian).
15. Schumpeter J. (2012). Science and ideology. In: D. Hausman (ed.). Philosophy of economics. Anthology. M.: Gaidar Institute Publ., pp. 320—329. (In Russian).
16. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 223—251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
17. Castellacci F., Consoli D., Santoalha A. (2020). The role of e-skills in technological diversification in European regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 1123—1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1681585
18. Chaudhary K. V., Prajapati R. S., Patel R. J. (2022). Technological gap in recommended castor production technology. Gujarat Journal of Extension Education, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 102—104. https://doi.org/10.56572/gjoee.2022.33.1.0019
19. Cimoli M., Katz J. (2003). Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: А Latin American perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 387—411. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387
20. Crespo J., Martín C., Velázquez F. J. (2004). International technology spillovers from trade: Тhe importance of the technological gap. Investigaciones Economicas, Vol. 28, No. 3, рр. 515—533.
21. Furceri D. (2005). Beta and sigma-convergence: A mathematical relation of causality. Economics Letters, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 212—215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.026
22. Gabriel L. F., Jayme F. G. Jr, Oreiro J. L. (2016). A North—South model of economic growth, technological gap, structural change and real exchange rate. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 38, pp. 83—94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2016.03.003
23. Guriev S., Vakulenko E. (2012). Convergence among Russian regions. CEFIR/NES Working Paper, No. 180. Centre for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School.
24. Posner M. V. (1961). International trade and technical change. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 323—341. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040877
25. Sala-i-Martin X. X. (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1325—1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00029-1
26. Thwaites A. T. (1978). Technological change, mobile plants and regional development. Regional Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 445—461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237800185391
27. Wang M., Feng C. (2020). The impacts of technological gap and scale economy on the low-carbon development of China’s industries: An extended decomposition analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 157, article 120050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120050
28. Zhang Y. (2021). The regional disparity of influencing factors of technological innovation in China: Evidence from high-tech industry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 811—832. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14828
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Ataeva A.G., Klimenteva A.Y. Process approach to assessing technological convergence of Russian regions: Dynamics of the innovation gap. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(5):130-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-130-152