|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The analysis of economics of industries, inter-industry complexes and regions: In search of general patterns (On the book “System-oriented modeling of the real sector of the Russian mesoeconomy” edited by G. B. Kleiner)
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-6-150-160
Abstract
The results of empirical studies of a number of Russian industries and production complexes, based on the methodology of system-oriented modeling and the concept of mesoeconomic systems, are characterized and evaluated. The analysis of theoretical foundations for regulating mesoeconomic systems proposed in the monograph has been carried out. The economic and sociological methodological interpretations of understanding such systems are compared, and the advantages of the first one are substantiated. The unsolved methodological problems of mesoeconomics are formulated.
About the Author
V. L. Tambovtsev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vitaly L. Tambovtsev
Moscow
References
1. Volynskiy A. I. (2017). Mesolevel as object of research in the scientific economic literature of contemporary Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 36—49. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-297.2017.9.3.036-049
2. Kirdina-Chandler S. G., Mayevsky V. I. (2018). Meso-level of economic analysis: Some issues of methodology. In: V. I. Mayevsky, S. G. Kirdina-Chandler, M. A. Deryabina (eds.). Mesoeconomics: Present state and prospects. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS, pp. 66—87. (In Russian).
3. Kirdina-Chandler S. G., Mayevsky V. I. (2020). Evolution of heterodox mesoeconomics. Terra Economicus, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 30—52. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-3-30-52
4. Kleiner G. B. (2013). System economics and system-oriented modeling. Economics and Mathematical Methods, Vol. 49, No. 4, рр. 71—93. (In Russian).
5. Kleiner G. B. (ed.) (2023). System-oriented modeling of the real sector of the Russian mesoeconomy. Moscow: Nauchnaya Biblioteka. (In Russian).
6. Mayevsky V. I., Kirdina Chandler S. G. (2020). Introduction. In: V. I. Mayevsky, S. G. Kirdina Chandler (eds.). Mesoeconomics: Elements of a new paradigm. Мoscow: Institute of Economics, RAS, pp. 21—41. (In Russian).
7. Tambovtsev V. L. (1995). Economic security of economic systems: Structure of the problem. Moscow University Economics Bulletin, No. 3, pp. 3—9. (In Russian).
8. Tambovtsev V. L. (2022). The plurality of institutional approaches and difficulties of scholarly communication. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 86—99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.1.006-024
9. Taranukha Y. V. (2022). Will mesoeconomics become a new direction in economic theory? St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 259—284. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.205
10. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 701—728. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970214
11. Arnstein S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 216—224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
12. Eden C., Ackermann F., Williams T. (2005). The amoebic growth of project costs. Project Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 15—27. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280503600203
13. Elder-Vass D. (2010). The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure, and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Flyvbjerg B., Bruzelius N., Rothengatter W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M. S., Buhl S. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3, рр. 279—295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273
16. Henkel J., Maurer S. M. (2007). The economics of synthetic biology. Molecular Systems Biology, Vol. 3, article 117. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100161
17. Martin J. L., Lee M. (2015). Social structure. In: J. D. Wright (ed.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Vol. 22. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 713—718. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32154-7
18. Merton R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, Vol. 1, No. 6, рр. 894—904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
19. Powell W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In: B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummints (eds.). Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 295—336.
20. Samuel B. (1989). Why costs increase when projects accelerate. Graves Research Technology Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 16—18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1989.11670581
21. Simon H. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York:
22. Macmillan. Wahlberg T. H. (2014). Elder-Vass on the causal power of social structures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 774—791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393113500213
Review
For citations:
Tambovtsev V.L. The analysis of economics of industries, inter-industry complexes and regions: In search of general patterns (On the book “System-oriented modeling of the real sector of the Russian mesoeconomy” edited by G. B. Kleiner). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(6):150-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-6-150-160
Views:
374
Email this article 
