|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Understanding Economics as a (Social) Science? (On the Book by M. Boumans, J. Davis “Economic Methodology. Understanding Economics as a Science”)
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-150-156
Abstract
This review discusses the latest textbook on economic methodology. It shows that its authors think of the philosophy of science as primarily the philosophy of “hard”, natural sciences and have not tried to interpret economic theory as a social science. At the same time the book is characterized by its attention towards more recent methodological approaches, in particular, to the rhetoric of economics, and this direction might be considered as promising.
About the Author
I. Boldyrev
National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Blaug M. (2004 [1980]). The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Moscow: Journal “Voprosy Ekonomiki”.
2. Kuhn T. (2009 [1962]). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow: AST.
3. Fleck L. (1999 [1935]). The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Moscow: Idea-Press, Dom Intellektualnoi Knigi.
4. Friedman M. (1994 [1953]). The Methodology of Positive Economics // THESIS. Vol. 4. P. 20—52.
5. Boumans M. (2005). How Economists Model the World into Numbers. L.: Routledge.
6. Boumans M., Davis J. (2010). Economic Methodology. Understanding Economics as a Science. L.: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Brock W., Durlauf S. (1999). A Formal Model of Theory Choice in Science // Economic Theory. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 113—130.
8. Callon M. (ed.). (1998). The Laws of the Markets. N. Y.: Blackwell.
9. Colander D. (2001). The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Dasgupta P., David P. A. (1994). Toward a New Economics of Science // Research Policy. Vol. 23, No 5. P. 487—521.
11. Dow S. C. (2002). Economic Methodology: An Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Eggertsson T. (1995). On the Economics of Economics // Kyklos. Vol. 48, No 2. P. 201—210.
13. Frank R., Gilovich T., Regan D. (1993). Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 159—171.
14. Frey B. (2003). Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing Between One’s Own Ideas and Academic Success // Public Choice. Vol. 116, No 1—2. P. 205—223.
15. Grüne-Yanoff T., Schweinzer P. (2008). The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory // Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol. 15, No 2. P. 131—146.
16. Haavelmo T. (1944). The Probability Approach in Econometrics // Econometrica. Vol. 12. (Supplement). P. iii—115.
17. Hands D. W. (2001). Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. MacKenzie D., Muniesa F., Siu L. (eds.). (2007). Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Popper K. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Wien: Julius Springer.
20. Samuelson P. A. (1963). Problems of Methodology: Discussion // American Economic Review. Vol. 53 , No 2. P. 231—236.
21. Sent E.-M. (1998). The Evolving Rationality of Rational Expectations: An Assessment of Thomas Sargent’s Achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Sent E.-M., Klamer A. (eds.) (2002). The Economics of Scientific Publication // Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol. 9. No 3. P. 265—358.
23. Wilber K. C., Harrison R. S. (1978). The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling and Holism // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 12, No 1. P. 61—89.
Review
For citations:
Boldyrev I. Understanding Economics as a (Social) Science? (On the Book by M. Boumans, J. Davis “Economic Methodology. Understanding Economics as a Science”). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2012;(10):150-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-150-156
Views:
542
Email this article 
