Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Нормативная теория рационального выбора: прошлое, настоящее и будущее
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-52-75
Аннотация
В статье показано, что теорию рационального выбора нужно понимать как нормативную, предписывающую, а не дескриптивную теорию экономического поведения. Такая интерпретация позволяет констатировать «нормативный поворот» в кономической науке, когда рациональный выбор не воспринимается более в качестве адекватного описания экономической деятельности большинством ученых. Кроме того, автор стремится отделить «нормативное» начало от этического смысла, который обычно придается ему в экономической науке, и показать, каковы перспективы нормативного поворота в свете современного развития поведенческой и экспериментальной экономики.
Ключевые слова
теория рационального выбора,
нормативная экономическая наука,
поведенческие аномалии,
экономическая теория благосостояния
JEL: B41; D03; D60
Об авторе
У. Хэндс
Университет Пьюжет-Саунда, Такома (штат Вашингтон, США)
Россия
профессор факультета экономики, Университет Пьюжет-Саунда, Такома (штат Вашингтон, США)
Россия
профессор факультета экономики, Университет Пьюжет-Саунда, Такома (штат Вашингтон, США)
Список литературы
1. Allais M. (1979). The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School // Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox / M. Allais, O. Hagen (eds.) Dordrecht: D. Reidel. P. 25—145.
2. Arrow K. J. (1959). Rational Choice Functions and Orderings // Economica. Vol. 26, No 102. P. 121—127.
3. Bardsley N., Cubitt R., Loomes G., Moffatt P., Starmer C., Sugden R. (2009). Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Berg N. (2003). Normative Behavioral Economics // Journal of Socio-Economics. Vol. 32, No 4. P. 411—427.
5. Berg N., Gigerenzer G. (2010). As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? // History of Economic Ideas. Vol. 18, No 1. P. 133—166.
6. Blaug M. (1992). The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Blume L. E., Easley D. (2008). Rationality // The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 884—893.
8. Bruni L., Sugden R. (2007). The Road Not Taken: How Psychology was Removed from Economics, and How It Might be Brought Back In // Economic Journal. Vol. 117, No 516. P. 146—173.
9. Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric Paternalism’ // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151. P. 1211—1254.
10. Camerer C., Loewenstein G. (2004). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future // Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Vol. 3. P. 3—52.
11. Davidson D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.[1st ed. 1980].
12. Davidson D. (2004). Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Davidson D., Suppes P., Siegel S. (1957). Decision Making: An Experimental Approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14. Davis J. B. (2011). Individuals and Identity in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. DellaVigna S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence From the Field // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 315—372.
16. Earl P. E. (2005). Economics and Psychology in the Twenty-First Century // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 29, No 6. P. 909—927.
17. Ellsberg D. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms // Econometrica. Vol. 75, No 4. P. 643—665.
18. Friedman M. (2001). Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
19. Friedman M. (1953). The Methodology of Positive Economics // Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Friedman M. (1955). What All is Utility? // Economic Journal. Vol. 65, No 259. P. 405—409.
21. Friedman M., Savage L. (1948). The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 56, No 4. P. 279—304.
22. Friedman M., Savage L. (1952). The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 60, No 6. P. 463—474.
23. Glimcher P. W. (2003). Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Glimcher P. W., Dorris M. C., Bayer H. M. (2005). Physiological Utility Theory and the Neuroeconomics of Choice // Games and Economic Behavior. Vol. 52, No 2. P. 213—256.
25. Guala F. (2000). The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory // Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol. 7, No 1. P. 59—93.
26. Hands D. W. (2010). Economics, Psychology, and the History of Consumer Choice Theory // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 34, No 4. P. 633—648.
27. Hands D. W. (2012). The Positive-Normative Dichotomy and Economics // Handbook of the Philosophy of Science/ D. Gabbay. P. Thagard, J. Woods (eds.). Vol. 13: Philosophy of Economics / U. Mäki (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. P. 219—239.
28. Hausman D. M. (2010). Hedonism and Welfare Economics // Economics and Philosophy. Vol. 26, No 3. P. 321—344.
29. Hausman D. M., McPherson M. (2006). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hausman D. M., McPherson M. (2008). The Philosophical Foundations of Normative Economics // The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 226—250.
31. Hempel C. G. (1962). Rational Action // Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Vol. 35. P. 5—23.
32. Heukelom F. (2009). Kahneman and Tversky and the Making of Behavioral Economics. PhD Thesis / University of Amsterdam.
33. Heukelom F. (2011). Behavioral Economics // The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology / J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 1—38.
34. Heukelom F. (2012). A History of Behavioral Economics [forthcoming].
35. Hicks J. R. (1946). Value and Capital. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press [1st ed. 1939].
36. Jallais S., Pradier P.-Ch., Teira D. (2008). Facts, Norms, and Expected Utility Functions // History of the Human Sciences. Vol. 21, No 2. P. 45—62.
37. Kahneman D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment // American Economic Review. Vol. 93, No 5. P. 1449—1475.
38. Kahneman D., Thaler R. H. (2006). Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 20, No 1. P. 221—234.
39. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions // The Journal of Business. Vol. 59. S251—S278.
40. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kahneman D., Wakker P., Sarin R. (1997). Back to Bentham? // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, No 2. P. 374—405.
42. Keynes J. N. (1917). The Scope and Method of Political Economy. 4th ed. L.: Macmillan [1st ed. 1890].
43. Lakatos I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations / J. Worrall, E. Zahar (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Lee K. S. (2011). Three Ways of Linking Laboratory Endeavors to the Realm of Policies // European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. Vol. 18, No 5. P. 755—776.
45. Marschak J. (1950). Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility // Econometrica. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 111—141.
46. Marschak J. (1951). Why ‘Should’ Statisticians and Businessmen Maximize ‘Moral Expectation’? // Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. McFadden D. (1999). Rationality for Economists? // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. Vol. 19. P. 73—105.
48. Mitchell W. C. (1950 [1915]). Wieser’s Theory of Social Economics // The Backward Art of Spending Money. N.Y.: Augustus M. Kelley. P. 225—257.
49. Mongin Ph. (2009). Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory // French Studies in the Philosophy of Science / A. Brenner, J. Gayon (eds.). N.Y.: Springer. P. 303—357.
50. Nozick R. (1990 [1963]). The Normative Theory of Individual Choice. N.Y.: Garland Publishing.
51. Nozick R. (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. Popper K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. N.Y.: Harper & Row.
53. Popper K. R. (1994). Models, Instruments, and Truth: The Status of the Rationality Principle // The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality. L.: Routledge. P. 154—184.
54. Putnam H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Rabin M. (1998). Psychology and Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 11—46.
56. Robbins L. (1935). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. L.: Macmillan and Co. [first edition 1932].
57. Rosenberg A. (1992). Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Rosenberg A. (1995). Philosophy of Social Science. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59. Ross D. (2005). Economic Theory and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Savage L. J. (1952). Une Axiomatisation de Comportement Raisonnable Face а l’Incertitude // Économétrie, Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Paris, 12–17 mai.
61. Savage L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. N.Y.: Wiley.
62. Savage L. J. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Dover.
63. Searle J. R. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Sent E.-M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back Into Economics // History of Political Economy. Vol. 36, No 4. P. 735—760.
65. Smith V. L. (1991). Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 99, No 4. P. 877—897.
66. Souter R. W. (1933). “The Nature and Significance of Economic Science”: in Recent Discussions // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 47. P. 377—413.
67. Starmer C. (2005). Normative Notions in Descriptive Dialogues // Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol. 12, No 2. P. 277—289.
68. Starmer C. (2009). Expected Utility and Friedman’s Risky Methodology // The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy / U. Mäki (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 285—302.
69. Sugden R. (1991). Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy // Economic Journal. Vol. 101, No 407. P. 751—785.
70. Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H. (2003a). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1159—1202.
71. Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H. (2003b). Libertarian Paternalism // American Economic Review. Vol. 93, No 2. P. 175—179.
72. Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
73. Suppes P. (1961). The Philosophical Relevance of Decision Theory // Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 58 No 21. P. 605—614.
74. Thaler R. H. (2000). From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 133—141.
75. Weber M. (1975 [1908]). Marginal Utility Theory and ‘The Fundamental Law of Psychophysics’ // Social Science Quarterly. Vol. 56, No 1. P. 21—36.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Хэндс У. Нормативная теория рационального выбора: прошлое, настоящее и будущее. Вопросы экономики. 2012;(10):52-75. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-52-75
For citation:
Hands W. Normative Rational Choice Theory: Past, Present, and Future. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2012;(10):52-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-52-75
Просмотров: 1475
Послать статью по эл. почте 