Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Time allocation among different sorts of activities: An overview of mathematical models

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-11-148-160

Abstract

The history of time use research dates back more than 100 years. Russian scientists were among the first to conduct large-scale surveys in this field. Nowadays, this sphere has become interesting among scientists again. Rosstat has rebegun to conduct surveys on the daily time use, large-scale independent surveys have appeared, and media have increased their interest. The amount of empirical microdata that has emerged has made it possible to examine a complex concept as the household time use in ever more numbers. The purpose of this methodological overview is to describe the most significant mathematical models that have been used and are being used to study the time budgets of the population. This article overviews the first models in which time was considered as one of the means of production along with other goods, and households tried to maximize the utility function solely based on financial considerations. Then, modern models, where time is no less an important factor of well-being than material status, are represented. The article demonstrates how the new model classes that have recently emerged adapt to the data that is accessible in certain circumstances, modify themselves to accomplish fresh tasks, and become less costly when looking at analytical estimations. In order to categorize the population’s time budget structure under different research activities, the paper examines and systemsatizes a number of mathematical models

About the Authors

S. A. Ter-Akopov
HSE University
Russian Federation


N. D. Voronina
HSE University
Russian Federation


N. S. Mikhailova
HSE University
Russian Federation


M. A. Nagernyak
HSE University
Russian Federation


References

1. Kalabikhina I. E. (2020). Measuring by time: A new paradigm of socio-demographic policy. Narodonaselenie, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 37—50. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.2.4

2. Karakhanova T. M., Bolshakova O. A. (2016). Laborers time budget as a reflection of their actual behavior in everyday life. Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 70—96. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2016.18.3.413

3. Karakhanova T. M., Bolshakova O. A. (2023). The use of free time by urban residents. In: M. K. Gorshkov (ed.). Russia reforming: Yearbook, Iss. 21. Moscow: FCTAS RAS, pp. 350—383. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2023.14

4. Patrushev V. D. (1994). Changes in the use of the Moscow workers’ time budget for 1923—1991. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

5. Patrushev V. D. (1998). Changes in the living conditions and time budget of pensioners. Sociologicheskiy Journal, No. 3—4, pp. 264—267. (In Russian).

6. Патрушев В. Д., Караханова Т. М. (1992). Время населения: динамика его использования. М.: Институт социологии РАН. Population time: Dynamics of its use. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

7. Strumilin S. G. (1924). Time budget of the Russian worker and peasant in 1922—1923. Moscow and Leningrad: Voprosy Truda. (In Russian). Чаянов А. В. (1989). Крестьянское хозяйство: Избранные труды. М.: Экономика. Chayanov A. V. (1989). Peasant economy: Selected works. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).

8. Apps P. (2004). Gender, time use, and models of the household. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3233. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3233

9. Becker G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, Vol. 75, No. 299, pp. 493—517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949

10. Becker G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1063—1093. https://doi.org/10.1086/260265

11. Bevans G. E. (1913). How workingmen spend their time. Columbia: Columbia University. Bhat C. R., Koppelman F. S. (1999). A retrospective and prospective survey of timeuse research. Transportation, Vol. 26, pp. 119—139. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005196331393

12. Browning M., Chiappori P. A., Weiss Y. (2014). Economics of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015882

13. Chiappori P. A., Lewbel A. (2015). Gary Becker’s “A theory of the allocation of time”. Economic Journal, Vol. 125, No. 583, pp. 410—442. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12157

14. Chiappori P. A., Dias M. C., Meghir C. (2018). The marriage market, labor supply, and education choice. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 126, No. S1, pp. S26—S72. https://doi.org/10.1086/698748

15. Chiappori P. A., Costa Dias M., Meghir C., Xiao P. (2024). Divorce with children: Тhe partial efficiency approach. Unpublished manuscript.

16. Cragg J. G. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 829—844. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909582

17. Feldman L. P., Hornik J. (1981). The use of time: An integrated conceptual model. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 407—419. https://doi.org/10.1086/208831

18. Fernández R., Wong J. Ch. (2017). Free to leave? A welfare analysis of divorce regimes. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 72—115. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20150293

19. García B. (2013). Implementation of a double-hurdle model. Stata Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 776—794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1301300406

20. Goussé M., Jacquemet N., Robin J. M. (2017). Marriage, labor supply, and home production. Econometrica, Vol. 85. No. 6, рр. 1873—1919. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11221

21. Jäggi B., Weis C., Axhausen K. W. (2013). Stated response and multiple discretecontinuous choice models: Analyses of residuals. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 6, pp. 44—59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2013.04.005

22. Jara-Díaz S. R., Munizaga M. A., Greeven P., Guerra R., Axhausen K. (2008). Estimating the value of leisure from a time allocation model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 946—957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.03.001

23. Jara-Díaz S., Rosales-Salas J. (2017). Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 97, pp. 209—230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.022

24. Kitamura R. (1984). A model of daily time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 255—266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(84)90036-5

25. Kitamura R., Fujii S., Pas E. I. (1997). Time-use data, analysis and modeling: Тoward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 225—235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00018-8

26. Lundberg S., Pollak R. A. (2003). Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household, Vol. 1, pp. 153—167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025041316091

27. Mazzocco M. (2007). Household intertemporal behaviour: A collective characterization and a test of commitment. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 857—895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00447.x

28. Mincer J. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. Aspects of labor economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 63—105.

29. Popa F. (2007). On Pareto efficiency and equitable allocations of resources. Romanian Economic Journal, Vol. 10, No. 23, pp. 73—79.

30. Reeves M. P. (1913). Round about a pound a week. London: G. Bell and sons.

31. Saxena S., Pinjari A. R., Roy A., Paleti R. (2021). Multiple discrete-continuous choice models with bounds on consumptions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 149, pp. 237—265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.016

32. Theloudis A., Velilla J., Chiappori P., Giménez-Nadal J. I., Molina J. A. (2022). Commitment and the dynamics of household labor supply. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 15737. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4285834

33. UN (2016). International classification of activities for time-use statistics 2016. New York: United Nations.

34. Voena A. (2015). Yours, mine, and ours: Do divorce laws affect the intertemporal behavior of married couples? American Economic Review, Vol. 105, No. 8, pp. 2295—2332. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120234

35. Yamamoto T., Kitamura R. (1999). An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non-working days. Transportation, Vol. 26, pp. 231—250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005167311075


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Ter-Akopov S.A., Voronina N.D., Mikhailova N.S., Nagernyak M.A. Time allocation among different sorts of activities: An overview of mathematical models. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(11):149-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-11-148-160

Views: 476


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)