Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-1-94-114
Abstract
The article examines the possible reasons for the dominance of fundamentalism( in the form of Pigouvianism or market fundamentalism) over functionalism (Coasianism) in the practice of decision-making in economic policy. Continuing the study of the relationship between Coasianism, Pigouvianism and market fundamentalism, presented in previous works, the article focuses on finding the basis for the dominance of fundamentalism at the level of individual decisions and actions — in particular, in the field of cognitive bias and behavioral effects. Decision-making using an automatic cognitive system, subject to cognitive bias, as opposed to a reflective system, can lead to the choice of a fundamentalist solution to a problem where it is not the most efficient, and also reduces the efficiency of functionalism, since it prevents the correct identification of the problem itself, of the structural alternatives for its solution, as well as identifying and comparing the effects associatedwith each of the alternatives. The microfoundations of insufficient supply and demand of the Coasian approach are explored. Based on the identified problems of supply and demand for Coasianism, as one of the possible ways to promote it, it is proposed to consider the primary socialization of the individual in the learning process, the formation of substantive critical thinking. It is emphasized that adjustments to the socialization process are a matter of long-term strategy
Keywords
cognitive bias,
Coasian approach,
Pigouvian approach,
behavioraleconomics,
market fundamentalism,
economic policy
JEL: D62, D91, E14, H23
About the Authors
N. S. Pavlova
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. E. Shastitko
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow
References
1. Avtonomov V. S. (1993). Man in the mirror of economic theory. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
2. Avtonomov V. S. (1998). The model of man in economic science. St. Petersburg: Economic School. (In Russian).
3. Auzan A. A., Maltsev A. A., Kurdin A. A. (2023). Russian economic education: image of the near future. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. … (In Russian). https://doi.org/
4. Siebert H. (2005). Cobra effect: how to avoid wrong paths in policy. Moscow: Novoye Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).
5. Siegfried J. (ed.) (2011). Better living through economics. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
6. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2018). On current state of economics: subjective semi-sociological observations. (Working paper WP3/2018/03). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (In Russian).
7. Kobrinskiy N. E., Mayminas E. Z., Smirnov A. D. (1982). Economic cybernetics. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).
8. Coase R. (1993). The firm, the market, and the law. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
9. Leijonhufvud A. (1993). Life Among the Econ. THESIS, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 277-287. (In Russian).
10. Maltsev A. A. (2023). Peter the Great and interdisciplinary synthesis. Moscow University Economics Bulletin, No. 2, pp. 3-19. (In Russian.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-1
11. Pavlova N. S. (2017). Behavioral aspects of regulator decisions. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7—18. (In Russian).
12. Tirole J. (2020). Economics for the common good. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
13. Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. E. (2017). The experience of the subject identification of New institutional economics. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 6, pp. 63-73. (In Russian).
14. Metalanguage within disciplinary discourse for scientific research programs: Invitation to a debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 96—115. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115
15. Furubotn E., Richter R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. St. Petersburg: St Petersburg University Publ. (In Russian).
16. Shastitko A. E. (2010). New institutional economics. 4th ed. Moscow: Teis. (In Russian).
17. Shastitko A. E. (2021). Pigouvianism vs. Coasianism: Who wins? Economics of Contemporary Russia, No. 3, pp. 49—57. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-3(94)-49-57
18. Shastitko A. E., Golovanova S. V. (2014). Competition issues regarding procurement of capital-intencive goods for a large buyer (lessons learned from one antitrust case). Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 1, pp. 67—89. (In Russian).
19. Shastitko A. E., Ionkina К. A. (2023). Institutional response after technological changes in telecommunications. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 50-67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-50-67
20. Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S. (2023). Pigouvian vs. Coasian approach: ideas, values, perspectives. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 23-46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-23-46
21. Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2018). Russian production of large-diameter pipes organization: the context, results, and prospects. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 435-464. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2018.306
22. Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2019). Informal institutions in contracting under conditions of fundamental changes (evidence from the large-diameter pipe industry). St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 484–512. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.401
23. Eggertsson T. (2001). Economic behavior and institutions. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
24. Bugental D. B., Grusec J. E. (2006). Socialization processes. In: N. Eisenberg (ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 366–428.
25. Cooper J. (2003). Behavioral economics and biased regulators. Mercatus on Policy Series working paper, George Mason University.
26. Cooper J., Kovacic W. (2012). Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior. Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9180-1
27. Downs A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
28. Friedman J. (2005). Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance. Critical Review, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, pp. 1-58, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810508443623
29. Gerber A., Hoffman M., Morgan J., Raymond C. (2020). One in a million: field experiments on perceived closeness of the election and voter turnout. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 287-325. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180574
30. Heiner R. (1983). The origins of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, Vol. 73, pp. 560-595.
31. Jones, P.E., Roelofsma P.H.M.P. (2000). The Potential for Social Contextual and Group Biases in Team Decision-Making: Biases, Conditions and Psychological Mechanisms. Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1129–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084914
32. Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
33. Kahneman D., Krueger A., Schkade D., Schwarz N., Stone A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, Vol. 312, No. 5782, pp. 1908–1910.
34. Katsoulacos Y. (2022). Why legal standards in antitrust enforcement in developing jurisdictions should differ from those in mature jurisdictions: A decision-theoretic approach. BRICS Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1-19.
35. Kwak J. (2013). Cultural capture and the financial crisis. In: D. Carpenter, D. A. Moss (eds). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–98.
36. Kunda Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, pp. 480–498.
37. Lucas G., Tasić S. (2015). Behavioral Public Choice and the Law. West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 118, pp. 199-266.
38. Menard C., Shabalov I., Shastitko A. (2021). Institutions to the rescue: Untangling industrial fragmentation, institutional misalignment, and political constraints in the Russian gas pipeline industry. Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 80, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102223
39. North D. C. (1993). What do we mean by rationality. Public Choice, Vol. 77, pp. 159–162.
40. OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7a9638cb-en.
41. Patt A., Zeckhauser R. (2000). Action bias and environmental decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 21, pp. 45–72.
42. Persson E., Tinghög G. (2020). Opportunity cost neglect in public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 170, pp. 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.012
43. Schmalensee R. (2012). “On a level with dentists?” Reflections on the evolution of industrial organization. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp.157-179.
44. Shastitko A., Golovanova S., Avdasheva S. (2014) Investigation of collusion in procurement of one Russian large buyer. World Competition, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 235-247.
45. Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters, E., MacGregor D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D., Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.
46. Tasic S. (2011). Are Regulators Rational? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 17, No.1, Article 3.
47. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, Penguin Books.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Pavlova N.S., Shastitko A.E. Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(1):94-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-1-94-114
Views:
537
Email this article 
