Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Does inequality make you angry?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-3-73-95
Abstract
Our study explores subjective inequality using two different measures. The first one is agreement with the statement that the gap between the rich and the poor is large. The second one is an emotional reaction to this gap in terms of intensity of anger. Using data from the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) for 2019, we show that these measures, though correlated, are not duplicates. The first finding is that respondents are more likely to state significant gaps than to admit a negative emotion related to this fact. The second finding is that these dimensions of subjective inequality are associated with different behavioral reactions. Agreeing that the income gaps are too large correlates with demand for redistribution more strongly than the anger does. As to being angry on the inequality, it is more strongly associated with perception of potential conflicts between the poor and the rich. In other words, even agreeing that income inequality is high many individuals do not internalize it and do not accept it as a problem that touches their emotional health.
Keywords
inequality,
perception of inequality,
measurement of inequality,
social mobility,
perceptions of justice,
income redistribution
JEL: D31, D91, I31, I32, I39
About the Authors
V. E. Gimpelson
University of Wisconsin—Madison; HSE University
United States
United States
Vladimir E. Gimpelson
Madison, Moscow
G. A. Monusova
Independent researcher
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina A. Monusova - Independent researcher.
Moscow
References
1. Agadullina Е. R., Lavelina D. Y., Tatarenko М. K. (2023). Measuring perceived economic inequality: A comparison of methods. Psychological Studies, Vol. 16, No. 90, article 5. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v16i90.1437
2. Gimpelson V. E., Monusova G. A. (2014). Perception of inequality and social mobility. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 216—248. (In Russian).
3. Alesina A., Giuliano P. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In: J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, M. O. Jackson (eds.). Handbook of social economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, pp. 93—131. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00004-8
4. Alesina A., Stantcheva S., Teso E. (2018). Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 521—554. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20162015
5. Bavetta S., Li Donni P., Marino M. (2019). An empirical analysis of the determinants of perceived inequality. Income and Wealth, Vol. 65, No. 2, рр. 264—292. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12351
6. Benabou R., Ok E. (2001). Social mobility and demand for redistribution: Тhe POUM hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 447—487. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144078
7. Blinder A. S., Krueger A. B. (2004). What does the people know about economic policy, and how does it know it? NBER Working Paper, No. 10787. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10787
8. Bussolo M., Ferrer-Carbonell A., Giolbas A., Torre I. (2021). I perceive therefore I demand: Тhe formation of inequality perceptions and demand for redistribution. Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 835—871. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12497
9. Clark A., D’Ambrosio C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In: A. B. Atkinson, F. Bourguignon (eds.). Handbook of income distribution, Vol. 2A. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1148—1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00014-X
10. Cruces G., Perez-Truglia R., Tetaz M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 98, рр. 100—112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
11. Duffy B. (2019). Why we’re wrong about nearly everything: A theory of human misunderstanding. New York: Basic Books. Elster J. (1998). Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, рр. 47—74.
12. Gimpelson V., Treisman D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics and Politics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 27—54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103
13. Hirschman A., Rothschild M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 544—566. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882024
14. ISSP Research Group (2022). International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality V — ISSP 2019. ZA7600 Data file Version 3.0.0. Cologne: GESIS. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14009
15. Karadja M., Möllerström J., Seim D. (2017). Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 99, No. 2, рр. 201—212. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00623
16. Knell M., Stix H. (2020). Perceptions of inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, article 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101927
17. Kuhn A. (2015). The individual perception of wage inequality: A measurement framework and some empirical evidence. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 9579. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2708392
18. Mareeva S. (2020). Socio-economic inequalities in modern Russia and their perception by the population. Journal of Chinese Sociology, Vol. 7, article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00124-9
19. Meltzer A. H., Richard S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5, рр. 914—927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013
20. Niehues J. (2014). Subjective perceptions of inequality and redistributive preferences: An international comparison. IW-TRENDS Discussion Paper, No. 2. Cologne Institute for Economic Research.
21. Piketty T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 551—584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946692
22. Ravallion M., Lokshin M. (20 0 0). Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 76, No. 1, рр. 87—104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00064-X
23. Sandel M. (2021). The tyranny of merit. New York: Macmillan.
24. Sen A. (2000). Social justice and the distribution of income. In: N. A. Atkinson, F. Bourguignon (eds.). Handbook of income distribution, Vol. 1. A msterdam: North Holland, pp. 59—85.
25. Trapeznikova I. (2019). Measuring income inequality. IZA World of Labor, article 462. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.462
26. Trump K. (2023). Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 104, No. 2, рp. 180—188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13269
27. UNDP (2010). Human development report 2010: The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Gimpelson V.E., Monusova G.A. Does inequality make you angry? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(3):73-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-3-73-95
Views:
959
Email this article 
