Knowledge-based view of the firm and the phenomenon of knowledge encapsulation

The article is devoted to the development of the knowledge-based approach to the theory of the firm (KBV). It is noted that the modern mainstream KBV (R. Grant (1996) and numerous followers) sees the nature of the firm in effective integration of the knowledge of specialists employed in it. The article proposes to supplement this analysis with the second important function of the firm — its role as an encapsulator of knowledge. The foundations of such an approach to knowledge were laid by H. Demsetz, but have not yet been developed in the literature. The essence of encapsulation is to reduce complete knowledge to an algorithm of actions sufficient to achieve the goal, which is possible, say, with the help of instructions, directions of the manager, built in constructive “foolproofing”, etc. The compiler of the instruction does not integrate his knowledge with the knowledge of its performer, but prescribes the unquestioned implementation of the algorithm of behaviour. Thus, huge cost savings are achieved on the training of performers. The article considers the limiting case — the scheme of the firm functioning as a pure encapsulator of knowledge, the Markov property of the process is substantiated. The role of the entrepreneur as an architect and manager of the knowledge encapsulation scheme is revealed. At the same time, significant negative aspects of production based on the widespread use of encapsulated (incomplete — you do what you do not understand) knowledge are analyzed. In particular, the non-creative nature of labour in the encapsulationbased firm (a particular manifestation of which is the slow spread of horizontally organized or teal firms) and the threat of disqualification of performers when combining encapsulation with artificial intelligence are discussed

1. Галлай М. Л. (1963). Испытано в небе. М.: Молодая гвардия. [Gallay M. L. (1963). Tested in the sky. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya. (In Russian).]

2. Демсец Х. (2001). Еще раз о теории фирмы // Природа фирмы. К 50-летию выхода в свет работы Р. Коуза «Природа фирмы» / Под ред. О. И. Уильямсона, С. Дж. Уинтера. М.: Дело. C. 237—268. [Demsetz H. (2001). The theory of the firm revisited. In: O. E. Williamson, S. G. Winter (eds.). The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development. Moscow: Delo, pp. 237—268. (In Russian).]

3. Клейнер Г. Б. (2021). Системная экономика: шаги развития. М.: Научная библиотека. [Kleiner G. B. (2021). System economics: Steps of development. Moscow: Scientific Library. (In Russian).]

4. Клейнер Г. Б. (2022). Социальное лидерство, расщепление власти и инклюзивное управление организацией // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 26—44. [Kleiner G. B. (2022). Social leadership, power splitting, and inclusive management of the organization. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 26—44. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-26-44

5. Лалу Ф. (2016). Открывая организации будущего. М.: Ман, Иванов и Фербер. [Laloux F. (2016). Reinventing organizations. Moscow: Man, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russian).]

6. Макаров В. Л. (2003). Экономика знаний: уроки для России // Вестник Российской академии наук. Т. 73, № 5. С. 450—456. [Makarov V. L. (2003). The knowledge economy: Lessons for Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 450—456. (In Russian).]

7. Мальцев В. В., Юданов А. Ю. (2022). Феномен инкапсуляции знания и его роль в построении теории издержек передачи знания // Журнал институциональных исследований. Т. 14, № 2. С. 6—21. [Maltsev V. V., Yudanov А. Y. (2022). The knowledge encapsulation phenomenon and its role in the construction of a knowledge transfer cost theory. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 6—21. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.2.006-021

8. Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. (2000). Эволюционная теория экономических изменений / Центр эволюционной экономики. М.: Финстатинформ. [Nelson R., Winter S. (2000). An evolutionary theory of economic change. C enter for Evolutionary Economics. Moscow: Finstatinform. (In Russian).]

9. Хайек Ф. А. (2011). Индивидуализм и экономический порядок. Челябинск: Социум. [Hayek F. A. (2011). Individualism and economic order. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. (In Russian).]

10. Хайек Ф. А. (2018). Конституция свободы. М.: Новое издательство. [Hayek F. A. (2018). The constitution of liberty. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).]

11. Юданов А. Ю., Вольская Е. А., Ишмухаметов А. А., Денисова М. Н. (2008). Фармацевтический маркетинг. М.: Ремедиум. [Yudanov A. Y., Volskaya E. A., Ishmukhametov A. A., Denisova M. N. (2008). Pharmaceutical marketing. Moscow: Remedium. (In Russian).]

12. Юданов А. Ю. (2022). Перламутровая организация Г. Б. Клейнера как альтерна- тива управленческой энтропии. Рецензия на книгу: Клейнер Г. Б. Системная экономика: шаги развития // Российский журнал менеджмента. Т. 20, № 3. С. 441—451. [Yudanov A. Y. (2022). The pearl organization of G. B. Kleiner as an alternative to managerial entropy. Review of the book: Kleiner G. B. System economics: Steps of development. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 441—451. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.306

13. Almeida P., Phene A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8—9, pp. 847—864. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.388

14. Barney J. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, Vol. 27, pp. 643—650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602

15. Carlile P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 5, pр. 555—568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094

16. Coase R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 386—405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

17. Demsetz H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 4, No. 1, рp. 141—163.

18. Florida R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, pр. 196—205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414541693

19. Foray D. (2004). Economics of knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

20. Gode D., Sunder S. (1993). Allocative efficiency of markets with zero intelligence traders. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, No. 1, pр. 119—137. https:// doi.org/10.1086/261868

21. Grant R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. S2, рp. 109—122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

22. Grant R. M. (2013). Reflections on knowledge-based approaches to the organization of production. Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 541—558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9195-0

23. Grant R. M., Baden-Fuller C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 61—84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x

24. Grant R., Phene A. (2022). The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential. Global Strategy Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 3—30. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1399

25. Kamura K. (2020). A simple explanation of the teal organization — Its significance for today & feasibility in Japan. Japan SPOTLIGHT, March—April, pp. 40—42.

26. Kemeny J., Snell L. J. (1976). Finite Markov chains. New York: Springer.

27. Maltsev V. V., Yudanov A. Y. (2022). Toward a Demsetzian knowledge theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1371—1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00901-6

28. Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm — The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 6, pр. 617—632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0093

29. OECD, Eurostat (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. 4th ed. Paris; Luxembourg: OECD Publishing; Eurostat. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

30. Penrose E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley. Pereira V., Bamel U. (2021). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 132, pp. 557—570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.021

31. Romero A. M., Uruburu Á., Jain A. K., Ruiz M. A., Muñoz C. F. G. (2020). The path towards evolutionary — Teal organizations: A relationship trigger on collaborative platforms. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 23, article 9817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239817

32. Śledzik K. (2013). Schumpeter’s view on innovation and entrepreneurship. In: S. Hittmar (ed.). Management trends in theory and practice. Žilina: University of Žilina Publ., pp. 89—95. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257783

33. Suarez-Battan M. (2021). The rise of the imagination worker. Forbes, December 13. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mural/2021/12/13/the-rise-of-the-imaginationworker/?sh=288ce0c5c913

34. Teece D. J. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, No. 1, pр. 35—54. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00117-X

35. Teece D. J., Kay N. M. (eds.) (2019). The evolution of the theory of the firm. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430700

36. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509—534. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0019

37. Tsoukas H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. S2, рp. 11—25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171104

38. Varshavskaya E. Y., Podverbnykh U. S. (2023). Impact of job mismatches on job satisfaction and turnover intention: Case of Russia. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, рр. 115—132. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2023.106

39. Wyrzykowska B. (2019). Teal organizations: Literature review and future research directions. Central European Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 124—141. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.12