Methodology of the narrative analysis in economics: The case of the entrepreneurial networks

The  purpose  of  the  article is to provide   theoretical and  empirical evidence  that narrative analysis  in economics  is not an integral part of qualitative research  and  is quite compatible with  the  methodology of quantitative research. The development of methods for collecting and  processing data is one of the significant directions in the development of both  empirical and theoretical research  in economics. Of  particular importance to this  direction is the  consistent expansion of the  consideration of social  factors in the  study of decision-making  processes, both  at the micro  and  macro  levels. Narrative economics, which  has  emerged  and  developed in  the  last decade, is an  integral part of this  trend. The article proposes  and  substantiates a methodology for empirical analysis  of narratives considered as sources  of quantitative information used in decision  making. This  distinguishes it from  the  methods of narrative analysis used in qualitative research  in the  social  sciences, although they  are not always distinguished in the literature. The technique combines  the search  for the frequency  of occurrence of various  phrases  on the Internet with  interview analysis, which  significantly reduces  the  time and  effort required to search  and  analyze the necessary  information about social  factors. The  effectiveness of the  proposed  methodology is tested on the  example  of the  analysis  of narratives that characterize personal entrepreneurial networks, no statistical information about which  is collected, although the  networks  themselves play  an important role in the  formation of new small  businesses. The presented results of the  analysis show that the  technique makes it possible  to obtain useful  quantitative data on such objects of economic  research.

1. Volchik V. V. (2022). To the issue of the theory and methodology of narrative economics. Issues of Economic Theory, No. 3, pp. 31—46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_3_31_46

2. Mashegov P. N., Zaitsev A. G., Zenchenko S. V. (2020). Innovative narrative as a basis for the economic system development. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University, No. 6, pp. 125—132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2020.6.16

3. Yakovleva K. (2018). Text mining-based economic activity estimation. Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 26—41. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.201804.26

4. Akerlof G. A., Shiller R. J. (2010). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36mk90z

5. Akerlof G. A., Snower D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 126B, pp. 58—71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021

6. Anderson A. R., Jack S. L., Dodd S. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 135—154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00037.x

7. Anderson J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 409—429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409

8. Bargh J. A., Huang J. Y. (2014). The evolutionary unconscious: From ‘selfish genes’ to ‘selfish goals’. In: J. P. Forgas, E. Harmon-Jones (еds.). Sydney symposium of social psychology. Motivation and its regulation: The control within. New York: Psychology Press, рp. 35—54.

9. Boring E. G. (1945). The use of operational definitions in science. Psychological Review, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 243—245. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054934

10. Boulding K. E. (1969). Economics as a moral science. American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1—12.

11. Bratkovič Kregar T., Antončič B. (2016). The relationship between the entrepreneur’s personal network multiplexity and firm growth. Economic Research/Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1126—1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1211947

12. Bryman A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 78—92. https://doi.org/10.2307/590553

13. Collier P. (2016). The cultural foundations of economic failure: A conceptual toolkit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 126B, pp. 5—24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.017

14. Czarniawska B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Introducing qualitative methods. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209502

15. Dew N., Read S., Sarasvathy S. D., Wiltbank R. (2008). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 37—59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.008

16. Dubini P., Aldrich H. E. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 305—313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90021-5

17. Durda L., Ključnikov A. (2019). Social networks in entrepreneurial startups development. Economics and Sociology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 192—208. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/13

18. Garcia-Retamero R., Wallin A., Dieckmann A. (2007). Does causal knowledge help us be faster and more frugal in our decisions? Memory & Cognition, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 1399—1409. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193610

19. Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 433—448. https:// doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604

20. Goldman A. I. (2012). Theory of mind. In: E. Margolis, R. Samuels, S. P. Stich (eds.). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 402—424. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.013.0017

21. Greene J. C., Caracelli V. J., Graham W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 255—274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

22. Grodal S., Anteby M., Holm A. L. (2021). Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 591—612. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0482

23. Harrison R. L., Reilly T. M., Creswell J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 473—495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585

24. Jussim L. (2017). Précis of social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 40, No. e1, pp. 1—66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500062X

25. Kaplan A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.

26. Lanka E., Lanka S., Rostron A., Singh P. (2021). Why we need qualitative research in management studies. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Vol. 25, No. 2, article e200297. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200297.en

27. Lundberg G. A. (1942). Operational definitions in the social sciences. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 727—745. https://doi.org/10.1086/219004

28. Mitchell W. C. (1925). Quantitative analysis in economic theory. American Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1—12.

29. Newman I., Ridenour C. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research: A false dichotomy. In: I. Newman, C. Ridenour. Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 1—12.

30. Oatley K. (2008). The mind’s flight simulator. Psychologist, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1030—1032. Polkinghorne D. E. (1987). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

31. Robbins L. (1935). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: MacMillan and Co.

32. Shiller R. J. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 967—1004. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.4.967

33. Shiller R. J. (2019a). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 477—488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015

34. Shiller R. J. (2019b). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189970

35. Spiegler R. (2020). Behavioral implications of causal misperceptions. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 12, pp. 81—106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-072219-111921

36. Spreng R. N., Mar R. A., Kim A. S. N. (2008). The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: A quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 489—510. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21029

37. Stevens S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, Vol. 103, No. 2684, pp. 677—680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677

38. Summerfield C., de Lange F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 15, pp. 745—756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3838

39. Suppes P., Zinnes J. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In: D. Luce, R. R. Bush, E. Galanter (еds.). Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 3—76.

40. Turk-Browne N. B., Junge J. A., Scholl B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 552—564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552

41. Walsh K. (2012). Quantitative vs qualitative research: A false dichotomy. Journal of Research in Nursing, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 9—11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987111432053

42. Wimmer H., Perner J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 103—128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5

43. Yilmaz K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 311—325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

44. Zhao J., Al-Aidroos N., Turk-Browne N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 667—677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612460407