Long-term effects of extractive and inclusive institutions on entrepreneurship persistence in Russian regions

Some institutions can restrict or stimulate the  business activity, which affects long­term economic  growth. To assess this  influence on regional level, we have collected and processed  historical data on the  distribution of serfs, the  creation of universities, and  business  activity over  more  than a century. By business activity, we mean various  direct and  indirect assessments of the  involvement of the  population in entrepreneurial activity: merchants, NEPmen, cooperatives, small businesses, etc. Although the  geography of business  activity has constantly changed, we can  identify  relatively stable centers  (Moscow,  St. Petersburg, the  south  of the  Far Eastern Russia) and the  periphery (some regions of the  North Caucasus, the Central  Black   Earth  and   the Volga   regions).  Econometric calculations confirm  the  existence of a relationship between the  current density of small businesses  in the  Russian  regions and the  density of cooperatives in the  late Soviet period; the  relationship with  the  density of retail enterprises disappears by the 1970s as the planned economy  strengthens. But the relationship  with the  merchant class is ambiguous: only  in some regions  did  the  entrepreneurial culture manage  to survive  the  Soviet period. We distinguish three  main channels of  influence of  the historical level  of  business  activity on  the  modern  one: geographical, functional, and  socio­cultural.  According to the calculations, the  earlier  emergence  of universities in the  regions  contributed to the  spread  of business  culture and could stimulate the  emergence  of more inclusive institutions, but serfdom, as an extractive institution, on the  contrary, could  limit incentives for entrepreneurship. Even  after a radical change  in the  political and  economic regime, the  influence of extractive institutions on business  activity may persist, and  inclusive institutions take a significant amount of time to take root.

1. Aleksandrova E. A., Verkhovskaya O. R. (2016). Motivation of entrepreneurial activity: The role of the institutional environment. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, No. 3, pp. 107—138. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2016.305

2. Auzan A. A., Avdienkova M. A., Andreeva D. A., Bakhtigaraeva A. I., Bryzgalin V. A., Butaeva K. O., Weber S., Davydov D. V., Zolotov A. V., Nikitin K. M., Nikishina E. N., Pripuzova N. A., Stavinskaya A. A. (2017). Sociocultural factors of innovative development and successful implementation of reforms. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).

3. Baranov A., Malkov E., Polishchuk L., Rochlitz M., Syunyaev G. (2015). Measuring institutions in Russian regions: Methodology, sources of data, analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 69—103. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042­8736­2015­2­69­103

4. Barinov I. (2019). The history of Russian entrepreneurship. Moscow: Printleto. (In Russian).

5. Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P., Tsareva Y. V. (2023). Searching for entrepreneurship in Russia. Part I. What prevents small and medium­sized businesses from developing. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).

6. Bessolitsyn A. A. (2013). The history of Russian entrepreneurship. 3rd ed. Moscow: Financial Industrial University “Synergy”. (In Russian).

7. Veselov D. A., Yarkin A. M. (2022). Institutional changes, inequality and long­run economic development: Theory and empirics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 47—71. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042­8736­2022­1­47­71

8. Dolgopyatova T. G., Ichiro I., Yakovlev A. A. (2009). Russian companies after twenty years of reforms: From the socialist enterprise to a market firm. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 89—114. (In Russian).

9. Zazdravnykh E. A. (2019). The historical effects of the regional entrepreneurial activity. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 97—120. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2019.105

10. Zemtsov C. P., Tsareva Y. V. (2018). Entrepreneurial activity in the Russian regions: How spatial and temporal effects determine the development of small business. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 1, pp. 145—165. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221­2264­2018­37­1­6

11. Mau V. (1994). New economic policy in the context of the Russian revolution. In: New economic policy: Gains and losses. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 42—53. (In Russian).

12. Natkhov T. V., Polishchuk L. I. (2017). Political economy of institutions and development: The importance of being inclusive. Reflection on “Why nations fail” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part I. Institutions and economic development. Institutional choice. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 12—38. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221­2264­2017­34­2­1

13. Nikolskiy I. V. (1986). Geography of internal trade in the USSR. Moscow: MSU. (In Russian).

14. Pass A. A., Ryshiy P. A. (2012). Nationalization of cooperation in the USSR in the second half of the 1950s: Causes and consequences. Society and Power, No. 5, pp. 114—122. (In Russian).

15. Polterovich V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio­economic development. Part 1. Geography, institutions, or culture? Voprosy Economiki, No. 11, pp. 5—26. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042­8736­2018­11­5­26

16. Rosstat (2020). Labor force, employment and unemployment in Russia (based on the results of sample labor force surveys). Statistical compendium. Moscow: Rosstat. (In Russian).

17. Fedorov V. A. (ed.) (1994). End of serfdom in Russia: Documents, letters, memoirs, articles. Moscow: MSU Publ. (In Russian).

18. Chepurenko A. Y. (2012). What is entrepreneurship and what entrepreneurship policy does Russia need? (Marginal notes on works of modern foreign classics). Journal of the New Economic Association, Vol. 2, No. 13, pp. 102—124. (In Russian).

19. Chepurenko A. Y., Yasin E. G., Buev V. V., Shestoperov O. M. (2004). Small business in Russia: Past, present and future. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).

20. Yakovlev A. A. (2006). Agents of modernization. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russia).

21. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. London: Profile.

22. Ageev A. I., Gratchev M. V., Hisrich R. D. (1995). Entrepreneurship in the Soviet Union and post­socialist Russia. Small Business Economics, Vol. 7, No. 5, рр. 365—376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01302737

23. Andersson M., Koster S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start­up rates — evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 11, No. 1, рр. 179—201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp069

24. Audretsch D. B., Belitski M. (2021). Three­ring entrepreneurial university: In search of a new business model. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 5, рр. 977—987. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896804

25. Audretsch D. B., Belitski M. (еd.) (2022). Developments in entrepreneurial finance and technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884342

26. Audretsch D. B., Keilbach M. C., Lehmann E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183511.001.0001

27. Baumol W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton University Press.

28. Blundell R., Bond S., Windmeijer F. (2001). Estimation in dynamic panel data models: Improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. In: B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (eds.). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 53—91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731­9053(00)15003­0

29. Bosma N., Content J., Sanders M. et al. (2018). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics, Vol. 51, рр. 483—499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­018­0012­x

30. Buggle J. C., Nafziger S. (2019). The slow road from serfdom: Labor coercion and longrun development in the former Russian Empire. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 1—46. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00857

31. Chepurenko A., Sauka A. (eds.) (2017). Entrepreneurship in transition economies. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­319­57342­7

32. Chepurenko A., Kristalova M., Wyrwich M. (2019). Historical and institutional determinants of universities’ role in fostering entrepreneurship. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 48—59. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500­2597.2019.4.48.59

33. Decker S., Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. (2020). The tangled historical roots of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, рр. 616—638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1348

34. Djankov S., Ganser T., McLiesh C., Ramalho R., Shleifer A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 31—64. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.3.31

35. Falck O., Guenther C., Heblich S., Kerr W. R. (2013). From Russia with love: The impact of relocated firms on incumbent survival. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 13, No. 3, рр. 419—449. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs035

36. Fritsch M., Bublitz E., Sorgner A., Wyrwich M. (2014). How much of a socialist legacy? There­emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Business Economics, Vol. 43, No. 2, рр. 427—446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­014­9544­x

37. Fritsch M., Greve M., Wyrwich M. (2022a). Long­run effects of communism and transition to a market system on self­employment: The case of Germany. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221094498

38. Fritsch M., Obschonka M., Wahl F., Wyrwich M. (2021a). Cultural imprinting: Ancient origins of entrepreneurship and innovation in Germany. Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 12.

39. Fritsch M., Pylak K., Wyrwich M. (2022b). Historical roots of entrepreneurship in different regional contexts — the case of Poland. Small Business Economics, Vol. 59, No. 1, рр. 397—412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­021­00535­z

40. Fritsch M., Sorgner A., Wyrwich M., Zazdravnykh E. (2019). Historical shocks and persistence of economic activity: Еvidence on self­employment from a unique natural experiment. Regional Studies, Vol. 53, No. 6, рр. 790—802. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1492112

41. Fritsch M., Storey D. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional Studies, Vol. 48, No. 6, рр. 939—954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574

42. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925—2005. Regional Studies, Vol. 48, No. 6, рр. 955—973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816414

43. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start­ups over time and space — an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, Vol. 51, No. 2, рр. 337—353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­018­0016­6

44. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2023). Entrepreneurship in the long­run: Empirical evidence and historical mechanisms. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 19, No. 1, рр. 1—125. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000100

45. Ivanov D. (2016). Human capital and knowledge­intensive industries location: Evidence from Soviet legacy in Russia. Journal of Economic History, Vol. 76, No. 3, рр. 736—768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050716000802

46. Jack S. L., Anderson A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17, No. 5, рр. 467—487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883­9026(01)00076­3

47. Kerr S. P., Kerr W. R. (2020). Immigration policy levers for US innovation and startups. NBER Working Paper, No. 27040. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27040

48. Korosteleva J., Belitski M. (2017). Entrepreneurial dynamics and higher education institutions in the post­communist world. Regional Studies, Vol. 51, No. 3, рр. 439—453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1103370

49. Lin J., Rauch F. (2020). What future for history dependence in spatial economics? Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 94, article 103628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103628

50. Markevich A., Zhuravskaya E. (2018). The economic effects of the abolition of serfdom: Evidence from the Russian Empire. American Economic Review, Vol. 108, No. 4—5, рр. 1074—1117. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160144

51. Millán J. M., Congregado E., Román C. (2014). Persistence in entrepreneurship and its implications for the European entrepreneurial promotion policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 36, 1, рр. 83—106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.001

52. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, Vol. 87, No. 3, рр. 237—265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944­8287.2011.01121.x

53. North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual frame-work for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839

54. Nunn N. (2008). The long­term effects of Africa’s slave trades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 123, No. 1, рр. 139—176. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.139

55. Reynolds P., Bosma N., Autio E., Hunt S., De Bono N., Servais I., Lopez­Garcia P., Chin N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998—2003. Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3, рр. 205—231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­005­1980­1

56. Rodríguez­Pose A., Crescenzi R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, Vol. 42, No. 1, рр. 51—67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654186

57. Wennekers S., van Wennekers A., Thurik R., Reynolds P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 293—309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187­005­1994­8

58. Xiao J., Boschma R., Andersson M. (2018). Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography, Vol. 94, No. 5, рр. 514—549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989

59. Zemtsov S., Chepurenko A., Mikhailov A. (2021). Pandemic challenges for the technological startups in the Russian regions. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 15, No. 4, рр. 61—77. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500­2597.2021.4.61.77

60. Zhuravskaya E., Guriev S., Markevich A. (2021). New Russian economic history. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP17244.