Trade damper effect of regional trade agreements

The authors explore the impact of crises on the dynamics of trade between partners within regional trade agreements (RTAs) with the aim to determine whether RTAs have a stabilizing effect on foreign trade. RTAs have become one of the main instruments of trade policy in recent decades. It is generally recognized that RTAs do stimulate trade at the time of stability and growth. It is logical to assume that meeting commitments between RTA partners should lead to the preservation of trade flows between them in the event of a crisis. However, this statement requires empirical confirmation. The study examines the effects of RTA networks for the three most active RTAs’ participants located on different continents — the EU, Chile and the Republic of Korea. The analysis of dynamics of these countries trade flows indicates a clear trend of strengthening trade interaction between RTA partners during crisis periods. The focus of the methodology of the study lies in computations of three trade indices: export significance index, trade intensity index and symmetric trade introversion index. They were calculated for the totality of trade partners for the EU, Chile and the Republic of Korea from 2005 to 2020 in order to identify the dominant tendencies of trade flows during periods of economic shocks of recent decades (the financial crisis of 2008—2009 and the crisis caused by the pandemic of 2019—2021). The authors come to the conclusion that for the studied countries and the EU RTAs act as a damper that reduces the negative impact of crises on foreign trade. Trade between RTA countries at the time of a crisis either decreased to a lesser extent compared to trade between countries that do not have RTA, or recovered faster. This empirically confirms yet another significant importance of RTAs. The authors suggest to make similar calculations for other countries and RTAs to support the revealed pattern.

1. Gurova I. P. (2009). Measuring the global and regional trade integration. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, No. 3, pp. 60—73. (In Russian).]

2. Zuev V. N., Ostrovskaya E. Y., Skryabina V. Y. (2021). The EAEU free trade agreements as a new viable format for the Russian trade policy. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 63—83. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-3-4

3. Kalachyhin H. M., Zuev V. N. (2022). Role of EU RTA network and anti-crisis measures in overcoming the effects of the pandemic. Current Problems of Europe, Vol. 1, No. 113, pp. 126—150. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2022.01.05

4. Anderson J. E., Yotov Y. V. (2016). Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990—2002. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 99, No. C, pp. 279—298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.10.006

5. Baldwin R., Tomiura E. (2020). Thinking ahead about the trade impact of COVID-19. In: R. Baldwin, B. Mauro (eds.). Economics in the time of COVID-19. London: CEPR Press, pp. 59—72.

6. Carrere C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 223—247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001

7. Cattaneo O., Gereffi G., Staritz C. (2010). Global value chains in a postcrisis world: A development perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8499-2

8. Dai M., Yotov Y. V., Zylkin T. (2014). On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economic Letters, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 321—325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.024

9. De P. (2010). Global economic and financial crisis: India’s trade potential and prospects, and implications for Asian regional integration. Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 32—68. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2010.25.1.32

10. Espitia A., Mattoo A., Rocha N., Ruta M., Winkler D. (2021). Pandemic trade: COVID-19, remote work and global value chains. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9508. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9508

11. Evenett S., Fiorini M., Fritz J., Hoekman B., Lukaszuk P., Rocha N., Ruta M., Santi F., Shingal A. (2020). Trade policy responses to the COVID—19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9498. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9498

12. Henn C., McDonald B. (2014). Crisis рrotectionism: The observed trade impact. IMF Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 77—118. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2014.4

13. Lejtman R. (2020). Exclusivo: El non paper que explica la decisiуn de la Argentina frente a la crisis política en el Mercosur. Infobae, Abril 25. https://www.infobae.com/politica/2020/04/25/exclusivo-el-non-paper-que-explica-la-decision-de-la-argentina-frente-a-la-crisis-politica-en-el-mercosur/

14. Limao N. (2016). Preferential trade agreements. In: K. Bagwell, R. Staiger (eds.). Handbook of commercial policy, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 279—367. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.013

15. Limao N., Maggi G. (2015). Uncertainty and trade agreements. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1—42. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20130163

16. Liu X., Ornelas E., Shi H. (2021). The trade impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. CESifo Working Paper, No. 9109. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3862243

17. Maggi G. (2014). International trade agreements. In: G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, K. Rogoff (eds.). Handbook of international economics, Vol. 4. Elsevier, pp. 317—390. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00006-9

18. Mikic M., Gilbert J. (2007). Trade statistics in policymaking: A handbook of commonly used trade indices and indicators. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. United Nations publication.

19. Nguyen D. (2019). A new examination of the impacts of regional trade agreements on international trade patterns. Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 236—279. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2019.34.2.236

20. Nicita A., Saygili M. (2021). Trade agreements and trade resilience during COVID-19 Pandemic. UNCTAD Research Paper, No. 70.

21. UNCTAD (2021а). Improving access to medical products through trade: What can regional trade agreements do in times of crisis? United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations publication.

22. UNCTAD (2021b). Key statistics and trends in trade policy 2021. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations publication.

23. Zuev V. (2020). International trade at a triple crossroads. In: L. Grigoryev, A. Pabst (eds.). Global governance in transformation. Challenges for international cooperation. Cham: Springer, pp. 183—200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_12