Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Privatization in extractive industry under foreign penetration

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-11-73-89

Abstract

This paper analyzes optimal privatization policy in exhaustible resource industry where a public domestic firm is less cost efficient than a private multinational firm. It is shown that the impact of foreign penetration on optimal privatization depends on the cost asymmetry between the public and private firm. If the cost efficiency gap is small, then the optimal rate of privatization is a decreasing function of foreign ownership of multinational firm. However, if the cost efficiency gap is large, then, contrasting to existing studies, the result is quite different: full nationalization is optimal if the foreign ownership of multinational firm is low but full privatization becomes optimal if this share is high. Under moderate cost asymmetry foreign penetration does not have any impact on privatization. It is also demonstrated that an increase in foreign penetration results in faster resource extraction by the public firm while an increase in the state share accelerates public firm extraction if it was initially too slow in comparison with the socially efficient path and slows down if it was initially too fast.

About the Authors

A. A. Fridman
HSE University
Russian Federation

Alla A. Fridman

Moscow



A. D. Verbetskiy
Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Aleksey D. Verbetskiy

Moscow



References

1. Slastnikov A. D., Arkin V. I. (2020). Mathematical model of the firm’s partial privatization. Economics and Mathematical Methods, Vol. 56, Nо. 3, pp. 91—102. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S042473880010496-4

2. Cato S., Matsumura T. (2012). Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 168, pp. 444—454. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245612802920999

3. Dijkstra B. R., Mathew A. J., Mukherjee A. (2015). Privatization in presence of foreign competition and strategic policies. Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, pp. 271—290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-014-0407-3

4. Fridman A. (2018). Partial privatization in an exhaustible resource industry. Journal of Economics, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 159—173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0573-1

5. Fujiwara K. (2007). Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 51—65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0267-1

6. Haraguchi J., Matsumura T. (2020). Implicit protectionism via state enterprises and technology transfer from foreign enterprises. Review of International Economics, Vol. 28, pp. 723—743. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12468

7. Hotelling H. (1931). The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 137—175. https://doi.org/10.1086/254195

8. Lin M. H., Matsumura T. (2012). Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, pp. 71—80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0254-4

9. Matsumura T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 473—483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6

10. Xu L., Lee S.H., Matsumura T. (2017). Ex-ante versus ex-post privatization policies with foreign penetration in free-entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 50, pp. 1—7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.03.023

11. Wang C. C., Chiou J. R. (2018). Optimal privatization policy with Bertrand competition. International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 56, pp. 538—546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.12.008

12. Wang L. F. S., Chen T. L. (2010). Do cost efficiency gap and foreign competitors matter concerning optimal privatization policy at the free entry market? Journal of Economics, Vol. 100, pp. 33—49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0117-4

13. Wang L. F. S., Chen T. L. (2011). Mixed oligopoly, optimal privatization, and foreign penetration. Economic Modelling, Vol. 28, pp. 1465—1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.033

14. Wang L. F. S., Lee J. (2013). Foreign penetration and undesirable competition. Economic Modelling, Vol. 30, pp. 729—732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.007

15. Wang L. F. S., Tomaru Y. (2015). The feasibility of privatization and foreign penetration. International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 39, pp. 36—46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.06.001

16. Zhong L., Lahiri S. (2009). International joint ventures and tax competition in an integrated market. International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 18, pp. 38—44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2008.02.010


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Fridman A.A., Verbetskiy A.D. Privatization in extractive industry under foreign penetration. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(11):73-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-11-73-89

Views: 604


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)