Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Consumer finance in Russia: Income shocks and consumption smoothing

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-5-69-91

Abstract

On the basis of the Russian Survey of Household Finance, we investigate the consumption behavior of Russian households, who faced a negative income shock at the end of 2014. We also analyze the role of crisis-adjusting consumption strategies based on the instruments of financial market, namely an increase in the stock of debt or decrease in liquid and non-liquid assets. Results based on two identification procedures of income shocks show that Russian households were able to smooth around 50% of their income shock. The ability to smooth consumption is lower for those living in rural areas, households with higher levels of debt accumulated before 2014 and those with lower income. Overall, Russian households are not used to spend savings or increase their debt in response to the income changes with the exception of those who already had a higher level of debt by 2014. The results may have important implications for the Bank of Russia policy.

About the Authors

M. O. Mamedli
Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


A. A. Sinyakov
Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Ando A., Modigliani F. (1963). The “life cycle” hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 55-84.

2. Barrot J. N., Loualiche E., Plosser M. C., Sauvagnat J. (2017). Import competition and household debt (Staff Reports 821). Federal Reserve Bank of New York

3. Campbell J. Y., Mankiw N. G. (1990). Permanent income, current income, and consumption. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 265-279.

4. Carroll C., Slacalek J., Tokuoka K., White M. N. (2017). The distribution of wealth and the marginal propensity to consume. Quantitative Economics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 977-1020.

5. Christelis D., Georgarakos D., Jappelli T., Pistaferri L., Van Rooij M. (2017). Asymmetric consumption effects of transitory income shocks. DNB Working Papers.

6. Deaton A. S. (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 1221-1248.

7. Flavin M. A. (1981). The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 974-1009.

8. Friedman M. (1957). The permanent income hypothesis. In: A theory of the consumption function. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 20-37.

9. Gerry C. J., Li. C. A. (2010). Consumption smoothing and vulnerability in Russia. Applied Economics, Vol. 42, No. 16, pp. 1995-2007.

10. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. (2011). Labor market adjustment: Is Russia different? IZA Discussion Paper Series.

11. Grogan L. (2004). Social transfers and intrahousehold resource allocation: Evidence from Russia. Canadian Economics Association 38th annual meeting, Ryerson University, Toronto, June.

12. Jappelli T., Pistaferri L. (2010). The consumption response to income changes. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 479-506.

13. Hall R. E. (1978). Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp. 971-987.

14. Hall R. E., Mishkin F. S. (1982). The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: Estimates from panel data on households. Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 461-481.

15. Hall R. E., Taylor J. B. (1986). Consumption and income. Macroeconomics: Theory, performance, and policy. New York: Norton, pp. 63-67.

16. Heckman J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, pp. 475-492.

17. Khvostova I., Larin A., Novak A. (2014). Euler equation with habits and measurement errors: estimates on Russian micro data. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, No. WP BRP 52.

18. Krueger D., Perri F. (2009). How do households respond to income shocks? University of Pennsylvania, Mimeo.

19. Modigliani F., Brumberg R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. Franco Modigliani, Vol. 1, pp. 388-436.

20. Mu R. (2006). Income shocks, consumption, wealth, and human capital: Evidence from Russia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 857-892.

21. Notten G., Crombrugghe D. D. (2012). Consumption smoothing in Russia. Economics of Transition, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 481-519.

22. Semenova M. (2011). Save or borrow - what determines Russian households’ financial strategies? BOFIT Discussion papers, No. 28/2011.

23. Skoufias E. (2003). Consumption smoothing in Russia. Economics of Transition, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 67-91.

24. Stillman S. (2001). The response of consumption in Russian households to economic shocks. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, No. 412.

25. Sufi A. (2015). Out of many, one? Household debt, redistribution and monetary policy during the economic slump. Andrew Crockett Memorial Lecture, BIS.

26. Teppa F. (2014). Consumption behavior and financial crisis in the Netherlands. DNB Working papers, No. 453.


Review

For citations:


Mamedli M.O., Sinyakov A.A. Consumer finance in Russia: Income shocks and consumption smoothing. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(5):69-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-5-69-91

Views: 20044


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)