Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Environmentally responsible behavior: Attitudes of Russian SMEs

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-106-130

Abstract

The study of barriers and drivers of Russian SMEs’ environmentally responsible behavior is essential, since this business cluster is characterized by low information openness and transparency. The goal of the study was to research attitudes of owners and managers of Russian SMEs of different sizes towards diverse factors of internal and external business environment acting as barriers and drivers of SMEs’ environmentally responsible behavior. In this context, the following research tasks were set: to identify the significance of factors in SMEs’ external and internal environment (drivers and barriers) shaping their commitment to environmentally responsible practices after analyzing a broad range of publications in the corresponding scientific domain; to compare analytical results from reviewing academic publications to findings from the empirical study of Russian SMEs’ views and opinions. The research methods were questionnaire and interviews among representatives of 151 and 20 Russian SMEs respectively. The study revealed that the majority of respondents marked factors of external business environment, first of all, actions of federal and local authorities, as most significant barriers and drivers of environmentally responsible behavior of Russian SMEs of all sizes. They also mentioned “the culture of responsible production and consumption” in this regard. Market conditions (competition, opportunities of concluding contracts within the network of responsible suppliers, etc.) can be ranked second by their significance according to respondents’ answers. Factors of internal business environment (financial, human resources, time resources, etc.) are significantly less often perceived by SMEs’ representatives as drivers and barriers for their organizations’ green business practices. In contrast to other developing market economies, where SMEs include large corporations, business associations and technological, demographic and religion factors, along with governmental activities, into the list of important drivers for environmentally responsible behavior, the priority of authorities’ actions is absolute in the ranks of Russian SMEs in this regard. Employees of micro businesses were different in their estimations of restraints to environmentally responsible behavior, as well as of benefits that their firms may get from environmentally responsible initiatives, than their colleagues from medium-sized companies. The latter group increasingly relies on international organizations’ and UN recommendations, as well as competitors’ adherence to green practices. Research outcomes allow to conclude that if large corporations within Russia consider expansion of cooperation opportunities for responsible suppliers from the SMEs segment, while professional associations and communities boost efforts for increasing their awareness and knowledge of environmentally responsible practices, the degree of Russian SMEs interest to green projects and practices may become considerably higher.

About the Authors

L. M. Cheglakova
HSE University
Russian Federation

Liudmila M. Cheglakova 

Moscow



B. S. Bataeva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Bela S. Bataeva 

Moscow



O. A. Melitonyan
HSE University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Melitonyan 

Moscow



References

1. Andreeva A. M., Maksanova L. B., Mogloeva T. V. (2022). Environmental policy of enterprises in the sphere of tourism. Obshchestvo: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo, No. 3, pp. 45—50. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2022.3.7

2. Bataeva B. S., Cheglakova L. M., Melitonyan O. A. (2018). Social responsibility in Russian business: A research of attitudes of owners and managers in a small and medium-sized enterprises. Organizational Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 13—52. (In Russian).

3. Blinov A. O. (2015). Ecological development of small business. Business Strategies, No. 3, pp. 3—8. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17747/2311-7184-2015-3-1

4. Boboshko V. I. (2009). Development of a mechanism for ecological and economic regulation of small enterprises (theory, methodology, practice). Ph.D. Dissertation. Moscow: All-Russian Scientific-research Institute of Mineral Resources. (In Russian).

5. Varennikova E. V. (2011). Ecologically oriented and ecological entrepreneurship as economic categories. Upravlenie Ekonomicheskimi Sistemami: Elektronnyy Nauchnyy Zhurnal, No. 4, pp. 1—7. (In Russisn).

6. Vittenberg E. Y. (2010). Environmental responsibility of Russian business. Rossiya i Sovremennyy Mir, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 31—48. (In Russian).

7. Klepcha K., Remizov M., Ogorodnikov E. (2021). The sustainable development index went down. Expert, December 6. (In Russian). https://expert.ru/expert/2021/50/indeks-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-poshel-vniz/

8. Kozlova O. A., Volkova I. A. (2020). Trends in the development of green business: Тhe experience of the EU countries and Russian practice. Moscow: Znanie-M. (In Russian).

9. Lopatkova Y. A., Belyaeva Z. S. (2019). The impact of e-commerce on the social responsibility of small and medium-sized businesses in the global economy. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 48—68. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2019.18.1.003

10. Melanchenko A. O., Petchenko D. S. (2020). Environmental orientation of corporate social responsibility in Russia at the present stage. Sotsialnoe Predprinimatelstvo i Korporativnaya Sotsialnaya Otvetstvennost, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 151—168. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/social.1.4.111909

11. Expert Center (2021). SME/Post-COVID: Time for system solutions. Special report to the President of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Expert Center under the Presidential Commissioner for Entrepreneurs’ Rights. (In Russian).

12. Filicheva T. P. (2018). Problems of development of ecological entrepreneurship. Тhe Territory of New Opportunities. Тhe Herald of Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 51—56. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24866/VVSU/2073-3984/2018-1/51-56

13. Chistyakova M. K. (2017). Environmental management in small medium-sized businesses based on the introduction of information impact tools. Moskovskiy Ekonomicheskiy Zhurnal, No. 3, pp. 90—98. (In Russian).

14. Yadov V. A. (2011). Strategy of sociological research: Description, explanation, understanding of social reality. Moscow: Omega-L. (In Russian).

15. Álvarez Jaramillo J., Zartha Sossa J. W., Orozco Mendoza G. L. (2019). Barriers to sustainability for small and medium enterprises in the framework of sustainable development. Literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 512—524. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2261

16. Bakos J., Siu M., Orengo A., Kasiri N. (2020). An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium-sized enterprises: Patterns and trends. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1285—1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2433

17. Battisti M., Perry M. (2011). Walking the talk? Environmental responsibility from the perspective of small-business owners. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 172—185. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.266

18. Dey P. K., Petridis N. E., Petridis K., Malesios C., Nixon J. D., Ghosh S. K. (2018). Environmental management and corporate social responsibility practices of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 195, pp. 687—702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.201

19. Gelo O., Braakmann D., Benetka G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Рsychological and Behavioral Science, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 266—290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

20. Guo T., Shi Z. (2012). Systematic analysis on the environment of innovative small and medium enterprises. Physics Procedia, Vol. 24, pp. 1214—1220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.181

21. Hoogendoorn B., Guerra D., Zwan P. (2015). What drives environmental practices of SMEs? Small Business Economics, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 759—781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9618-9

22. Hsu S. J., Roth R. E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behaviour held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 229—249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040301

23. Hungerford H. R., Peyton R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education. California: J. Weston Walch.

24. Jamali D., Neville B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 599—621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0

25. Jenkins H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 241—256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6

26. Marshall С. M. B. (1998). Economic instruments and the business use of energy: A report. London: HM Treasury.

27. Nikolaou I. E., Nikolaidou M. K., Tsagarakis K. P. (2016). The response of small and medium-sized enterprises to potential water risks: An eco-cluster approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, No. Part 5, pp. 4550—4557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.068

28. Schaper M. (2002). The challenge of environmental responsibility and sustainable development: Implications for SME and entrepreneurship academics. In: U. Füglistaller, H. J. Pleitner, T. Volery, W. Weber (eds.). Radical changes in the world: Will SMEs soar or сrash. St Gallen: Recontres de St Gallen, pp. 525—534.

29. Seth D., Rehman M. A. A., Shrivastava R. L. (2018). Green manufacturing drivers and their relationships for small and medium(SME) and large industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 198, pp. 1381—1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.106

30. Sivek D. J., Hungerford H. (1990). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organizations. Journal of Environmental Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 35—40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9941929

31. Spence L. J., Rutherfoord R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1—5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026205109290

32. Spencer S. J., Steele С. M., Quinn D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 4—28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373

33. Testa F., Nucci B., Iraldo F., Appolloni A., Daddi T. (2017). Removing obstacles to the implementation of LCA among SMEs: A collective strategy for exploiting recycled wool. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 156, pp. 923—931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.101

34. Yapp C., Fairman R. (2006). Factors affecting food safety compliance within small and medium-sized enterprises: Implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Сontrol, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 42—51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.08.007


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Cheglakova L.M., Bataeva B.S., Melitonyan O.A. Environmentally responsible behavior: Attitudes of Russian SMEs. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(5):106-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-106-130

Views: 703


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)