Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

On retroeconomy

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-148-159

Abstract

This paper analyzes the problem of technological backwardness of economy. In many mostly developing countries their economies use obsolete technologies. This can create the illusion that this or that business is prosperous. At the level of international competition, however, it is obvious that these types of firms do not have any chance for success. Retroeconomics as a theory of technological backwardness and its detrimental effect upon a country’s economy is considered in the paper. The role of the government is very important for overcoming the effects of retroeconomy. The phenomenon of retroeconomy is already quite deep-rooted throughout the world and it is essential to consolidate the attention of economists and politicians on this threat.

About the Author

V. Papava
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Georgia


References

1. Anderson R. (2016). Just get out of the way: How government can help business in poor countries. Moscow, Chelyabinsk: IRISEN, Sotsium. (In Russian).

2. Balatsky E. V. (2003). Economic growth and technological traps. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 11, pp. 53—76. (In Russian).

3. Balatsky E. V. (2010). The role of optimism in the innovative development of the economy. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 1, рр. 3—20. (In Russian).

4. Balatsky E. V. (2011). Temporal model of crosscountry competition. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 2, pp. 3—20. (In Russian).

5. Balatsky E. V. (2012). Institutional and technological traps. Zhurnal Ekonomicheskoy Teorii, No. 2, pp. 48—63. (In Russian).

6. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. (2010). Economic growth. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya Znaniy. (In Russian).

7. Bell D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Moscow: Academia. (In Russian).

8. Bubenko P. T., Gusev V. A. (2016). Continue to affect the innovative development by talking. Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 7, pp. 82—92. (In Russian).

9. Heyets V. M. (2015). Overcoming the quasimarketness — a way to the investmentoriented model of economic growth. Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 6, pp. 4—17. (In Russian).

10. Glazyev S. (2009). World economic crisis as a process of substitution of technological modes. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 26—38. (In Russian).

11. Golichenko O. (2008). Problems of modernization of the innovative system and innovative policy in Russia. Innovatsii, No. 10, pp. 12—21. (In Russian).

12. Golichenko O. (2012). Models of development based on technology diffusion. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 117—131. (In Russian).

13. Gorodetsky A. E. (2013a). Crisis management and the post-crisis development model for Russia. Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 4, pp. 67—79. (In Russian).

14. Gorodetsky A. E. (2013b). Crisis management and the post-crisis development model for Russia. Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 5, pp. 66—74. (In Russian).

15. Dementiev V. E. (2006). A trap of technological adoption and the terms to overcome it in the two-sectors economic model. Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 17—32. (In Russian).

16. Keselman L. E., Matskevich M. G. (1998). Individual economic optimism/pessimism in a transforming society. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal, No. 1—2, pp. 39—54. (In Russian).

17. Knyazev Yu. (2014). Prospects of the Russian economy: Chance of acceleration. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 2—3, pp. 25—38. (In Russian).

18. Lipton D. (2016). China’s corporate-debt challenge. Project Syndicate, August 18. https:// www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-corporate-debt-problem-by-davidlipton-2016-08?barrier=accessreg

19. Menshikov S. (1999). New economy. Grounds of economic knowledge. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya. (In Russian).

20. Moldovan D. (2009). World economic crisis and positive thinking. Mir Peremen, No. 4, pp. 31—37. (In Russian).

21. Nedoroslev S. (2015). Retroeconomy: How would RBC 500 rank in the USSR. RBK Gazeta, September 28. (In Russian).

22. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (2000). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Moscow: Finstatinform. (In Russian).

23. Papava V. (2001). Necroeconomics — The phenomenon of the post-communist transition period. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 5, pp. 22—30. (In Russian).

24. Papava V. (2009). The problem of zombification of the postcommunist necroeconomy. Vestnik Instituta Kennana v Rossii, No. 15, pp. 37—48. (In Russian).

25. Papava V. (2014). On the “Necroeconomic post-industrialism” in the post-Soviet space. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 6, pp. 160—171. (In Russian).

26. Perez C. (2013). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).

27. Porter M. (1993). The competitive advantage of nations. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya. (In Russian).

28. Sorokin D. E. (2013). The fourth vector of the Russian economy. Problemy Teorii i Praktiki Upravleniya, No. 11, pp. 8—20. (In Russian).

29. Stiglitz J. E. (2014). The innovation enigma. Project Syndicate, March 9. https:// www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/joseph-e--stiglitz-argues-that-the-impactof-technological-change-on-living-standards-has-become-increasingly-unclear

30. Stiglitz J. E. (2016). Monopoly’s new era. Project Syndicate, May 13, https:// www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/high-monopoly-profits-persist-in-marketsby-joseph-e--stiglitz-2016-05?barrier=true.

31. Strelets I. A. (2003). New economy and information technologies. Moscow: Ekzamen. (In Russian).

32. Schumpeter J. (1995 [1942]). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).

33. Elyanov A. Ya. (2004). Globalization and catching-up development. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, No. 1, pp. 3—16. (In Russian).

34. Ahearne A. G., Shinada N. (2005). Zombie firms and economic stagnation in Japan. International Economics and Economic Policy, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 363-381.

35. Block F. (1990). Postindustrial possibilities: A critique of economic discourse. Berkley: University of California Press.

36. EPID (2015). Knowledge based economy. European Portal of Integration and Development, http://europejskiportal.eu/knowledge-based-economy/

37. Foster R., Kaplan S. (2001). Creative destruction: Why companies that are built to last underperform the market, and how to successfully transform them. New York: Currency.

38. Harman C. (2010). Zombie capitalism. Global crisis and the relevance of Marx. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

39. Hoshi T. (2006). Economics of the living dead. The Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 30-49.

40. Hossain S., Yu C. M. (2003). An introduction to knowledge economy. Concepts and issues. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

41. Howitt P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 829-846.

42. LeLaulu L. (2009). Zombie economics? The Development Executive Group, January 13. http://www.devex.com/articles/zombie-economics

43. Lin J. Y. (2012). Industrialization’s second golden age. Project Syndicate, January 3. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/industrialization-s-second- golden-age

44. Lindsey B. (2002). Against the dead hand: The uncertain struggle for global capitalism. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

45. Lipowski A. (1998). Towards normality. Overcoming the heritage of central planning economy in Poland in 1990-1994. Warsaw: Adam Smith Research Center, Center for Social and Economic Research.

46. Marin C. (2007). The new economy - knowledge based economy. The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Economics and Applied Informatics. Fascicle I. Years XIII, pp. 45-54.

47. Noland M., Pack H. (2003). Industrial policy in an era of globalization: lessons from Asia. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

48. OECD (1996). The knowledgebased economy (General distribution OCDE/GD(96)102). Paris: OECD Publishing.

49. OECD (2007). OECD economic surveys: India 2007. Paris: OECD Publishing

50. Onaran Y. (2012). Zombie banks. How broken banks and debtor nations are crippling the global economy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

51. Papava V. (2002). Necroeconomics - The theory of post-communist transformation of an economy. International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 29, No. 9-10, pp. 796-805.

52. Papava V. (2015). Necroeconomics of post-Soviet post-industrialism and the model of economic development of Georgia and Russia. Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 976-983.

53. Papava V. (2017). Retroeconomics - global challenge for economic development. The Market Oracle, February 9. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article58104.html

54. Parente S. L., Prescott E. C. (2000). Barriers to riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.

55. Polterovich V., Tonis A. (2010). Innovation and imitation at various stages of development: A model with capital. MPRA Paper, No. 20244.

56. Quiggin J. (2010). Zombie economics. How dead ideas still walk among us. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

57. Sachs J. F. (2017). Building the new American economy. Smart, fair, and sustainable. New York: Columbia University Press.

58. Schwab K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

59. Segerstrom P. S. (1991). Innovation, imitation, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 807-827.

60. Stiglitz J. E. (2001). Bankruptcy laws: Basic economic principles. In: S. Claessens, S. Djankov, A. Mody (eds.). Resolution of financial distress: An international perspective on the design of bankruptcy laws. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 1-23.

61. Stiglitz J. E., Lin J. Y. (eds.) (2013). The industrial policy revolution I. The role of government beyond ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

62. White M. J. (2001). Bankruptcy procedures in countries undergoing financial crises. In: S. Claessens, S. Djankov, A. Mody (eds.). Resolution of financial distress: An international perspective on the design of bankruptcy laws. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 25-45.


Review

For citations:


Papava V. On retroeconomy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(10):148-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-148-159

Views: 815


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)