

Structural transformation trajectories: Evidence from successful exporting countries
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-48-65
Abstract
This paper identifies and examines several success criteria for the structural transformation of exports. Some detailed facts for the leading countries in structural transformation are presented, and the paper is the first in social sciences literature to calculate the Fréchet distances between the structural transformation trajectories according to various criteria. The paper introduces the concept of structural transformation trajectory that is defined as the path in the two coordinates — per capita income and one of the success criteria for the structural transformation of exports. Based on the brief review of the literature, four criteria for the empirical research are selected: (i) an increase in the ratio of exports of capital to consumer products, (ii) an enhancement of the export share of high-tech products, (iii) a decrease in export concentration, and (iv) an expansion of export complexity. In most cases, countries leading structural transformation succeed due to a limited number of specific factors, such as foreign direct investment in a limited number of sectors, participation in the assembly of telecom products, automobiles or similar consumer products, and re-export of products from other countries. However, high per capita income growth rates are typically observed in countries with high coherence of the success criteria for the structural transformation of exports, that is, in countries that made progress on a whole range of criteria.
About the Author
A. A. GnidchenkoRussian Federation
Andrei А. Gnidchenko
Moscow
References
1. Aiginger K. (1997). The use of unit values to discriminate between price and quality competition. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 571—592. https:// doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013687
2. Alt H., Godau M. (1995). Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves. International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications, Vol. 5, No. 01n02, pp. 75—91. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218195995000064
3. Brandt L., Hsieh C., Zhu X. (2008). Growth and structural transformation in China. In: L. Brandt, T. G. Rawski (eds.). China’s Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 683—728.
4. Bubbico A., Keller M., Morales Opazo C. (2020). Perspectives on diversification prospects for the agrifood industry in Guyana. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9754en
5. Cadot O., Carrère C., Strauss-Kahn V. (2011). Export diversification: What’s behind the hump? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 590—605. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00078
6. Connolly R. (2012). Climbing the ladder? High-technology export performance in emerging Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 356—379. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.53.3.356
7. Crespo Cuaresma J., Worz J. (2005). On export composition and growth. Review of World Economics, Vol. 141, pp. 33—49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-005-0014-z
8. Dand R. (2011). The international cocoa trade. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead.
9. Haraguchi N., Cheng C., Smeets E. (2017). The importance of manufacturing in economic development: Has this changed? World Development, Vol. 93, pp. 293—315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.013
10. Hatzichronoglou T. (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper, No. 1997/02.
11. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C., Bustos S., Coscia M., Simoes A., Yildirim M. (2013). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Hausmann R., Klinger B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage. CID Working Paper, No. 146.
13. IMF (2018). World economic outlook: Cyclical upswing, structural change. Washington, DC.
14. Khan S. (2015). Caribbean economic alchemy: Has magic returned to bauxite? InterAmerican Development Bank Policy Brief, No. IDB-PB-238.
15. Kuznets S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 247—258.
16. Lall S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985—1998. University of Oxford QEH Working Paper, No. 44.
17. OECD (2019). Global South East Europe: Unleashing the transformation potential for growth in the Western Balkans. Paris: OECD Publishing.
18. Parteka A., Tamberi M. (2013). Product diversification, relative specialization and economic development: Import-export analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 38, рр. 121—135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.09.011
19. Schott P. (2004). Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 119, pp. 647—678. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/0033553041382201
20. Srholec M. (2007). High-tech exports from developing countries: A symptom of technology spurts or statistical illusion? Review of World Economics, Vol. 143, pp. 227—255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0106-z
21. Thomson W.C. (2015). Nordic, Central, and Southeastern Europe, 2015—2016. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. UNIDO (2017). Structural change for inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Vienna: UNIDO.
23. WEF (2016). Manufacturing our future: Cases on the future of manufacturing. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
24. Wood A. (2019). Globalization and structural change around the world, 1985—2015. World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 65—94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ wbro/lky009
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Gnidchenko A.A. Structural transformation trajectories: Evidence from successful exporting countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(12):48-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-48-65