

What should we do about the employment of women with children in Russia? The role of preschool educational institutions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-94-117
Abstract
The paper examines the opportunities and obstacles to increasing the employment of women with children in Russia. There is a tight correlation between Russia’s lagging behind in the share of working women with children under the age of three and a lack of supply of preschool and childcare institutions. Using quantitative analysis of the Russian regions, we show that the expansion of the supply of preschool education services is associated with an increase in the employment of women, and the cost of introducing additional places in preschool organizations is recouped by additional tax revenues from working women with children in two years. Our cross-country analysis shows that the transition from traditional gender and social roles to more equal ones, the reduction of gender inequality, the encouragement of fathers to take parental leave, and the increased availability of part-time or flexible-schedule employment for women with children could further facilitate the employment of women with children. Our estimates show that an increase of preschool enrollment in Russia to the level of European countries would materialize a sizable economic growth potential: an increase in income per capita would be 3.5%.
About the Authors
D. P. KolesnikRussian Federation
Daria P. Kolesnik
Moscow
A. A. Pestova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Pestova
Moscow; Prague, Czech Republic
A. G. Donina
Russian Federation
Anna G. Donina
Moscow; Prague, Czech Republic
References
1. Abankina I. V., Filatova L. M. (2019). Integrating the efforts of the state, families and businesses in providing accessibility of preschool education at an early age. In: I. V. Abankina, K. N. Polivanova, I. D. Frumin (eds.). From universal availability to modern quality: Preschool education in Russia. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 193—216. (In Russian).
2. Arzhenovsky S. V., Artamonova D. V. (2007). Assessment of salary losses for women with children. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 66—79. (In Russian).
3. Biryukova S. S., Makarentseva A. O. (2017). Estimates of the motherhood penalty in Russia. Population and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 50—70. (In Russian). https://doi.org/ 10.3897/popecon.1.e36032
4. Zhuravleva T. L., Gavrilova Y. A. (2017). Analysis of fertility determinants in Russia: What do RLMS data say? HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 145—182. (In Russian).
5. Karabchuk T. S., Nagernyak M. A. (2013). Employment determinants for mothers in Russia. Journal of Social Policy Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 25—48. (In Russian).
6. Levin M. I., Oshchepkov A. Y. (2013). Assessment of the impact of preschool educational institutions on the employment of Russian mothers. Finance and Business, No. 3, pp. 89—106. (In Russian).
7. Orlova E. A., Belousov D. R., Galimov D. I. (2020). A model of potential GDP and output gap for the Russian economy. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 2, pp. С. 60—71. (In Russian).
8. Rzhanitsyna L. (2000). Working women in Russia in the end of the 90-s. Voprosy Еkonomiki, No. 3, pp. 46—53. (In Russian).
9. Seliverstova I. (2008). Children’s enrollment in preschool education: Level, variations between regions and its reasons. Educational Studies, No. 3, pp. 199—209. (In Russian).
10. Baker M., Gruber J., Milligan K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 116, No. 4, pp. 709—745. https://doi.org/10.1086/591908
11. Barigozzi F., Cremer H., Roeder K. (2018). Women’s career choices, social norms and child care policies. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 168, pp. 162—173. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.10.004
12. Blau F. D., Kahn L. M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 3, рр. 251—256. https:// doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.251
13. Bloom D., Canning D., Fink G., Finlay J. (2009). Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 14, pp. 79—101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-009-9039-9
14. Boca D. Del, Monfardini C., See S. G. (2018). Government education expenditures, pre-primary education and school performance: A cross-country analysis. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP12756.
15. Boeckmann I., Misra J., Budig M. J. (2015). Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1301—1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou119
16. Cascio E. U., Haider S. J., Nielsen H. S. (2015). The effectiveness of policies that promote labor force participation of women with children: A collection of national studies. Labour Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 64—71. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.labeco.2015.08.002
17. Dechter E. K. (2014). Maternity leave, effort allocation, and postmotherhood earnings. Journal of Human Capital, Vol. 8, No. 2, рр. 97—125. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 677324
18. Dunst C. J., Leet H. E., Trivette C. M. (1988). Family resources, personal well-being, and early intervention. Journal of Special Education, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 108—116. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698802200112
19. Dunst C. J. (2000). Revisiting “rethinking early intervention”. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 95—104. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/027112140002000205
20. Felfe C., Lalive R. (2018). Does early child care affect children’s development? Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 159, рр. 33—53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco. 2018.01.014
21. Felfe C., Nollenberger N., Rodríguez-Planas N. (2015). Can’t buy mommy’s love? Universal childcare and children’s long-term cognitive development. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, рр. 393—422. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00148-014-0532-x
22. Fernández R. (2013). Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labor force participation over a century. American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 472—500. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.472
23. Glass C., Fodor E. (2011). Public maternalism goes to market: Recruitment, hiring, and promotion in postsocialist Hungary. Gender & Society, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 5—26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210390518
24. Gorlich D., de Grip A. (2009). Human capital depreciation during hometime. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 61, рр. i98—i121. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn044
25. Herbst C. M., Tekin E. (2011). Do child care subsidies influence single mothers’ decision to invest in human capital? Economics of Education Review, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 901—912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.03.006
26. Hsieh C.-T., Hurst E., Jones C. I., Klenow P. J. (2019). The allocation of talent and U.S. economic growth. Econometrica, Vol. 87, No. 5, рр. 1439—1474. https:// doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11427
27. Kashkarov D., Mamonov M., Pestova A. (2021). Childcare provision and human capital: The drivers of female labor supply. Paper presented at the 5th International RLMS-HSE User Conference, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, May 28—29.
28. Kazakova Y. (2019). Childcare availability and maternal labour supply in Russia. ISER Working Paper, No. 2019-11.
29. Kenworthy L. (2008). Jobs with equality. Oxford University Press.
30. Lalive R., Zweimüller J. (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 1363—1402. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1363
31. Lokshin M. (2004). Household childcare choices and women’s work behavior in Russia. Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 1094—1115. https://doi.org/ 10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.4.1094
32. Lovász A. (2016). Childcare expansion and mothers’ employment in post-socialist countries. IZA World of Labor, article 319. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.319
33. Mankiw N. G., Romer D., Weil D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 407—437. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2118477
34. Pettit B., Hook J. L. (2009). Gendered tradeoffs: Women, family, and workplace inequality in twenty-one countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35. Pfau-Effinger B. (2017). Development of culture, welfare states and women’s employment in Europe. Routledge.
36. Rindfuss R. R., Guilkey D. K., Morgan S. P., Kravdal Ø. (2010). Child-care availability and fertility in Norway. Population and Development Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, рр. 725—748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x
37. Saxonberg S., Sirovátka T. (2006). Failing family policy in post-communist Central Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 185—202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980600682089
38. Schönberg U., Ludsteck J. (2014). Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 469—505. https://doi.org/10.1086/675078
39. Tirole J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 1—22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298112
40. Trivette C. M., Dunst C. J., Hamby D. W. (2010). Influences of family-systems intervention practices on parent-child interactions and child development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 3—19. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0271121410364250
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kolesnik D.P., Pestova A.A., Donina A.G. What should we do about the employment of women with children in Russia? The role of preschool educational institutions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(12):94-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-94-117