Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Changes in the labor market status during the COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being of Russians
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-139-153
Abstract
This paper investigates the association between changes in the labor market status and subjective well-being of Russians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The materials of the first stage of the international project “Values in crisis” form the empirical dataset. Regression analysis shows that individuals who lost their jobs or closed their business during the initial period of the pandemic are somewhat less satisfied with their lives than those who did not. Being reduced to part-time work and working from home are not directly related to subjective well-being. At the same time, the strength of the association between subjective well-being and possible changes of the labor market status depends on such factors as the presence of children, as well as the value of self-enhancement (according to Schwartz) and conscientiousness (one of the Big Five personality traits). The job or business loss is associated with a decrease in subjective well-being among respondents without children; this association is not observed among those with children. In addition, the negative relationship between life satisfaction and job or business loss is stronger among individuals with high level of self-enhancement and weaker among those with high level of conscientiousness. Among respondents who had to switch to part-time or remote work, having children reduces the level of subjective well-being; among those without such experience, it is positively associated with subjective well-being.
About the Authors
N. E. Soboleva
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia E. Soboleva
Moscow
B. O. Sokolov
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris O. Sokolov
Moscow
References
1. Gimpelson V. E., Zudina A. A., Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2020). Non-cognitive components of human capital: Evidence from Russian data. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 5—31. (In Russian).https://doi.org/ 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-11-5-31
2. Loginov D. M. (2020). Social well-being of the Russian population during the acute stage of the epidemiological crisis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, No. 6, pp. 470—487. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/ monitoring.2020.6.1708
3. Rozhkova K. V. (2019). The return to noncognitive characteristics in the Russian labor market. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 81—107. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042- 8736-2019-11-81-107
4. Acemoglu D., Chernozhukov V., Werning I., Whinston M. (2020). Optimal targeted lockdowns in a multi-group SIR model. NBER Working Papers, No. 27102. https:// doi.org/10.3386/w27102
5. Allan B. A., Kim T., Liu T. Y., Deemer E. D. (2020). Moderators of involuntary part-time work and life satisfaction: A latent deprivation approach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 257—267. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/pro0000268
6. Argyle M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. 2nd ed. London: Methuen.
7. Binder M. (2016). Revisiting cheerful Jane and miserable John: The impact of income, good health, social contacts and education declines with increasing subjective wellbeing. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 544—553. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504851.2015.1085635
8. Bonacini L., Gallo G., Scicchitano S. (2021). Working from home and income inequality: Risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 303—360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7
9. Bobowik M., Basabe N., Paez D., Jimenez A., Bilbao M. A. (2011). Personal values and well-being among Europeans, Spanish natives and immigrants to Spain: Does the culture matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 401—419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9202-1
10. Brambor T., Clark W. R., Golder M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 63—82. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/pan/mpi014
11. Esche F. (2020). Is the problem mine, yours, or ours? The impact of unemployment on couples’ life satisfaction and specific domain satisfaction. Advances in Life Course Research, Vol. 46, article 100354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100354
12. EVS (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated dataset (EVS2017). Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. ZA7500 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13560
13. Goldberg L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 1216—1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
14. Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E., Puranen B. et al. (eds.) (2020). World Values Survey: Round seven — Country-pooled datafile. Madrid and Vienna: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.1
15. Hainmueller J., Mummolo J., Xu Y. (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 163—192. https://doi.org/10.1017/ pan.2018.46
16. Hald Andersen S. (2009). Unemployment and subjective well-being: A question of class? Work and Occupations, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 3—25. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0730888408327131
17. Haslam N., Whelan J., Bastian B. (2009). Big Five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 40—42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.001
18. Hayes N., Joseph S. (2003). Big Five correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 723—727. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00057-0
19. Helliwell J. F., Huang H., Wang S. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 15, pp. 145—162. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10902-013-9441-z
20. Kalleberg A. L. (2011). Good and bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s—2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21. Karabchuk T., Soboleva N. (2020). Temporary employment, informal work and subjective well-being across Europe: Does labor legislation matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 21, pp. 1879—1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00152-4
22. Le T. N. (2011). Life satisfaction, openness value, self-transcendence, and wisdom. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 171—182. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10902-010-9182-1
23. McCrae R. R., Costa Jr. P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In: O. P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin (eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 159—181.
24. Möhring K., Naumann E., Reifenscheid M., Wenz A., Rettig T., Krieger U., Friedel S., Finkel M., Cornesse C., Blom A. G. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: Longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1—17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669 6.2020.1833066
25. Oesch D., Lipps O. (2013). Does unemployment hurt less if there is more of it around? A panel analysis of life satisfaction in Germany and Switzerland. European Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 955—967. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs071
26. Oishi S., Diener E. F., Lucas R. E., Suh E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 980—990. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/01461672992511006
27. Radcliff B. (2005). Class organization and subjective well-being: A cross-national analysis. Social Forces, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 513—530. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0118
28. Rammstedt B., John O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10 item short version of the Big Five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 203—212. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jrp.2006.02.001
29. Reuschke D. (2019). The subjective well-being of homeworkers across life domains. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1326—1349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19842583
30. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 141—166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
31. Ryff C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1069—1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
32. Schwartz S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1—65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
33. Schwartz S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In: R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (eds.). Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London: SAGE, pp. 169—203.
34. Song Y., Gao J. (2020). Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 21, pp. 2649—2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00196-6
35. van der Meer P. H. (2014). Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: Why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 115, pp. 23—44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0207-5
36. Wheatley D. (2017). Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 567—585. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0950017016631447
37. Yerkes M. A., André S., Beckers D. G. J., Besamusca J., Kruyen P. M., Remery C., van der Zwan R., Geurts S. (2020). Intelligent lockdown, intelligent effects? The impact of the Dutch COVID-19 ‘intelligent lockdown’ on gendered work and family dynamics among parents. PLOS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 11, article e0242249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242249
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Soboleva N.E., Sokolov B.O. Changes in the labor market status during the COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being of Russians. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(12):139-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-139-153
Views:
1301
Email this article 
