Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Market exits during the pandemic

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-10-113-133

Abstract

The new coronavirus pandemic has triggered an economic crisis different from other crises in the acuteness and non-uniformity of its impact on various sectors of the economy. This paper analyzes how the dynamics of firms entering and exiting the market have changed in this environment and which groups of firms have shown to be the most vulnerable to the negative effect of the crisis. Our analysis shows that the number of newly registered firms dwindled sharply in the period of the toughest restrictions imposed to curtail the infection spread in April — May 2020. The recovery which followed in the subsequent months has failed to compensate for the spring’s slump, which may suggest a “scarring impact” of the crisis. July and October 2020 saw a substantial rise in companies’ exits from the market. The crisis has hurt not only the hardest hit industries but also other areas of economic activity. Liquidations rose most extensively among young firms aged less than three years. Relatively higher productivity firms exited less often than lower productivity companies. This may suggest a “cleansing effect” of the crisis. But with the redundant labor being unable to move to more productive firms, the positive effect of the crisis may be brought to naught. Therefore, for the consequences of the crisis to be remedied, incentives should be provided to new firms’ entries and support for efficient companies, especially for young firms showing growth potential. Stimulation of growth in the number of high-productivity firms should go hand in hand with the creation of conditions for new entities’ fast development, expansion, and efficiency enhancement.

About the Authors

E. V. Bessonova
Bank of Russia; HSE University
Russian Federation

Evguenia V. Bessonova

Moscow



S. M. Myakisheva
Bank of Russia
Russian Federation

Sofia M. Myakisheva

Moscow



A. N. Tsvetkova
Bank of Russia; HSE University
Russian Federation

Anna N. Tsvetkova

Moscow



References

1. Bessonova E. V., Morozov A. G., Turdyeva N. A., Tsvetkova A. N. (2020). Opportunities for accelerating labor productivity growth: The role of small and medium enterprises. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 98—114. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-98-114

2. Bessonova E., Tsvetkova A. (2020). Pulling out of the crisis: Why are young firms so important? Moscow: Bank of Russia. (In Russian).

3. Aghion P., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P., Prantl S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 91, No. 1, рр. 20 — 32. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.20

4. Bessonova E., Tsvetkova A. (2019). Productivity convergence trends within Russian industries: Firm-level evidence. Bank of Russia Working Paper Series, No. wps51.

5. Caballero R. J., Hammour M. L. (1994). The cleansing effect of recessions. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 5, рр. 1350 — 1368.

6. Cros M., Epaulard A., Martin P. (2021). Will Schumpeter catch Covid-19? CEPR Discussion Paper, 15834.

7. Foster L., Grim C., Haltiwanger J. (2016). Reallocation in the great recession: Cleansing or not? Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 34, No. S1, pp. S293 — S331. https://doi.org/10.1086/682397

8. Hong G. H., Saito Y. (2021). Firm exit patterns and the post-Covid cleansing mechanism: Evidence from Japan. VOXEU CEPR, February 25.

9. Melitz M. J., Polanec S. (2015). Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, рр. 362—375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12088

10. Miyakawa D., Oikawa K., Ueda K. (2021). Firm exit during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 59, рр. 101 — 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjjie.2020.101118

11. Muzi S., Jolevski F., Ueda K., Viganola D. (2021). Productivity and firm exit during the COVID-19 crisis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9671. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9671

12. Ouyang M. (2009). The scarring effect of recessions. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 56, No. 2, рp. 184 — 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjmoneco.2008.12.014

13. OECD (2020). Start-ups in the time of COVID-19: Facing the challenges, seizing the opportunities. Paris, May 13.

14. OECD (2021). Business dynamism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Which policies for an inclusive recovery? Paris, February 18.

15. Tian C. (2018). Firm-level entry and exit dynamics over the business cycles. European Economic Review, Vol. 102, рр. 298—326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecor-ev.2017.12.011


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Bessonova E.V., Myakisheva S.M., Tsvetkova A.N. Market exits during the pandemic. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(10):113-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-10-113-133

Views: 975


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)