|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Is unified institutional economics possible?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51
Abstract
In recent years, some papers were published with the aim to integrate the original institutional economics and new institutional economics. This paper considers the possibility to solve this problem. To do this, it has analyzed four tasks: firstly, how do the original institutionalists characterize their scientific program specificity; secondly, how do the original institutionalists criticize new institutional economics; thirdly, what do they mean by the integration of original institutional economics and new institutional economics, that they have been observing since the 1990s and fourthly, what do they propose as a integration program. The analysis showed that the explicit methodology of original institutionalism, in fact, attributes to it characteristics, which are very close to the properties of “folk theory”. New institutional economics’ criticism is often based on the distorted interpretations of this scientific research program. The authors typically understand as the institutionalisms’ similarity the facts of the new institutionalism development by Douglass North, who used the data of the empirical behavioral research, but not the claims of original institutionalism. The method of integration proposed in the literature presupposes the adoption of the old institutionalism methodology by the new institutionalism, which could drastically reduce the quality of its research. The paper concludes that under present-day conditions, it is practically impossible to create a unified institutional economics.
About the Author
V. L. Tambovtsev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vitaly L. Tambovtsev
Moscow
References
1. Boyer P. (2019). Minds make societies. How cognition explains the world humans create. Moscow: Alpina Non-fikshn. (In Russian)
2. Gulbina N. I. (2009). About classification of main currents of institutional theory. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Economika, No. 4, pp. 77—86. (In Russian)
3. Martishin E. M. (2012). Evolutionary theory — the basis of the modern paradigm of synthesis in economics. Terra Economicus, Vol. 10, No. 1—2, pp. 7—10. (In Russian).
4. Melikhov V. Y., Osadchaya T. G. (2011). Main development stages of institutional theory. Vestnik Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seria: Gumanitarnye Nauki, No. 12, pp. 427—432. (In Russian)
5. Napolskikh D. L. (2012). Structural modeling of innovation cluster innovation cluster’s institutional environment. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), No. 12, рp. 40—45. (In Russian).
6. Raskov D. E. (2010). Image of economics in institutionalism. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University. Series 5. Economics, No. 3, pp. 32—41. (In Russian).
7. Sazanova S. L. (2015). Abstract and structural modelling as methodological tools for institutionalism. In: B. A. Yerznkyan (ed.). Theory and practice of institutional reforms in Russia, Iss. 31, pp. 40—52. Moscow: CEMI RAS. (In Russian).
8. Tambovtsev V. L. (2020). Unproductivity of the methodological fusion’s attempts. Voprosy Teoreticheskoy Ekonomiki, No. 3, рр. 7—31. (In Russian).
9. Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. Е. (2017). The experience of the subject identification of new institutional economics. Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 6, pp. 63—73. (In Russian).
10. Khudokormov A. (еd.). (1998). History of economic thoughts. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian).
11. Shastitko A. (2003). The new institutional economics particularities in subject matter and methodology. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, рр. 24—41. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-1-24-41
12. Shastitko A. Е. (2013). The new institutional economic methodological status. Journal Economicheskoi Teorii, No. 4, pp. 36—47. (In Russian).
13. Bargh J. A., Huang J. Y. (2014). The evolutionary unconscious: From ‘selfish genes’ to ‘selfish goals’. In: J. P. Forgas, E. Harmon-Jones (еds.). Sydney symposium of social psychology. Motivation and its regulation: The control within. New York: Psychology Press, рp. 35—54.
14. Becker G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1063—1093. https://doi.org/10.1086/260265
15. Broeker L., Kiesel A., Aufschnaiter S., Ewolds H. E., Gaschler R., Haider H., Künzell S., Raab M., Röttger E., Thomaschke R., Zhao F. (2017). Why prediction matters in multitasking and how predictability can improve it. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, paper 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02021
16. Carrier D. (1992). A methodology for pattern modeling nonlinear macroeconomic dynamics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 221—242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1992.11505271
17. Coase R. H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 229—231.
18. Dequech D. (2013). Economic institutions: Еxplanations for conformity and room for deviation. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, рр. 81—108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137412000197
19. Diesing P. (1971). Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
20. Dugger W. M. (1979). Methodological differences between institutional and neoclassical economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 899—909. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1979.11503711
21. Dugger W. M. (1983). The transaction cost analysis of Oliver E. Williamson: A new synthesis? Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 95—114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1983.11504090
22. Dugger W. (1990). The new institutionalism: New but not institutionalist. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 423—431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1990.11505041
23. Gasper D. (1996). Essentialism in and about development discourse. European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 149—176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819608426656
24. Gräbner C., Kapeller J. (2015). New perspectives on institutionalist pattern modeling: Systemism, complexity, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 433—440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1042765
25. Granovetter M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481—510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
26. Groenewegen J. (2019). Bridging original and new institutional economics? In: F. Gagliardi, D. Gindis (еds.). Institutions and evolution of capitalism, рр. 93—109. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
27. Groenewegen J., Kerstholt F., Nagelkerke A. (1995). On integrating new and old institutionalism: Douglass North building bridges. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 467—475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505684
28. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 23—48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.23
29. Guth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 367—388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
30. Hanna J. F. (1969). Explanation, prediction, description, and information theory. Synthese, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 308—334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413732
31. Hayden F. G. (1989). Institutionalism for what: To understand inevitable progress or for policy relevance? Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 633—645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504930
32. Hirsch P. M., Lounsbury M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of ‘old’ and ‘new’ institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 406—418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004004
33. Hodgson G. M. (1989). Institutional economic theory: The old versus the new. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 249—269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000021
34. Hodgson G. M. (1993). Institutional economics: Surveying the “old” and the “new”. Metroeconomica, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 1—28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1993.tb00786.x
35. Hodgson G. (2004). Institutional economics: From Menger and Veblen to Coase and North. In: J. B. Davis, A. Marciano, J. Runde (еds.). The Elgar companion to economics and philosophy, pp. 84—101. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36. Hodgson G. M. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 7—25. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.7
37. Hodgson G. M. (2009). Institutional economics into the twenty-first century. Studi e Note di Economia, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 3—26.
38. Hodgson G. M. (2019). Prospects for institutional research. RAUSP Management Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 112—120. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-11-2018-0112
39. Hofman J. M., Sharma A., Watts D. J. (2017). Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science, Vol. 355, pp. 486—488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3856
40. Holland D., Quinn N. (1987). Introduction. In: D. Holland, N. Quinn (еds.). Cultural models in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3—40.
41. Johnson C. (1996). Deductive versus inductive reasoning: А closer look at economics. Social Science Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 287—299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(96)90024-5
42. Kaplan A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.
43. Klein P. G. (2000). New institutional economics. In: B. Bouckeart, G. De Geest (еds.) Encyclopedia of law and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 456—489.
44. Kunde W., Elsner K., Kiesel A. (2007). No anticipation — no action: Тhe role of anticipation in action and perception. Cognitive Processing, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 71—78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0162-2
45. Langlois R. (1989). What was wrong with the old institutional economics (and what is still wrong with the new)? Review of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 270—298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000022
46. Lind H. (1993). The myth of institutionalist method. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1—17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1993.11505390
47. Luz M. R. S., Fernandez R. G. (2018). Are we forgetting something? Remarks on the connections between Douglass North’s contributions and original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 589—599. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1469939
48. Mayhew A. (1989). Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms: Тhe social science context. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 319—333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000024
49. McNeal E. (1952). The necessity of prediction in the social sciences. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25—29.
50. Menard C. (2001). Methodological issues in new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 85—92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010023243
51. Menard C., Shirley M. M. (2014). The future of new institutional economics: From early intuitions to a new paradigm? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 541—565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741400006X
52. Mirowski P. (1987). The philosophical bases of institutionalist economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 1001—1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1987.11504695
53. Radzicki M. J. (2003). Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and a foundation for evolutionary economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 133—173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506561
54. Ramstad Y. (1986). A pragmatist’s quest for holistic knowledge: The scientific methodology of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 1067—1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1986.11504576
55. Richter R. (2005). The new institutional economics: Its start, its meaning, and its prospects. European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 161—200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752905001618
56. Rubin P. H. (2003). Folk economics. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 157—171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061637
57. Rutherford M. (1989). What is wrong with the new institutional economics (and what is still wrong with the old)? Review of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 299—318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000023
58. Rutherford M. (1995). The old and the new institutionalism: Can bridges be built? Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 443—451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505681
59. Rutherford M. (2001). Institutional еconomics: Then and now. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 173—194. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.173
60. Ryan B., Scapens R., Theobald M. (2002). Research method and methodology in finance and accounting. 2nd еd. London: Thomson.
61. Samuels W. J. (1990). The old versus the new institutionalism. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 83—86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259000000005
62. Selten R. (1991). Evolution, learning, and economic behavior. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 3—24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-8256(91)90003-W
63. Shiffrin R. M., Schneider W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 127—190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
64. Simon H. A. (1990). Bounded rationality. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (еds.). Utility and Probability. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15—18.
65. Spithoven A. (2019). Similarities and dissimilarities between original institutional economics and new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 440—447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.1594532
66. Summerfield C., de Lange F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 15, pp. 745—756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3838
67. Tabellini G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Еconomic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 677—716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00537.x
68. Tiemstra J. P. (1991). Varieties of institutional economics: The theory of the firm. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 43—50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824857
69. Tool M. R. (еd.) (1993). Institutional еconomics: Theory, method, policy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
70. Turk-Browne N. B., Junge J. A., Scholl B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 552—564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
71. Vandenberg P. (2002). North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.2.217
72. Von Staden P., Bruce K. (2015). Original and new institutional economics: Brethren rather than foes? Lessons from the sociocognitive turn in “late” Douglass North. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 111—125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1013882
73. Wilber C., Harrison R. (1978). The methodological basis of institutional economics: Рattern model, storytelling, and holism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 61—89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503505
74. Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
75. Wisman J. D., Rozansky J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 709—737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505198
76. Zhao J., Al-Aidroos N., Turk-Browne N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 667—677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612460407
Review
For citations:
Tambovtsev V.L. Is unified institutional economics possible? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(1):33-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51
Views:
1742
Email this article 
